Cherokee vs Norwegian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Cherokee
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Norwegian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Cherokee

Norwegians

Fair
Excellent
2,697
SOCIAL INDEX
24.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
243rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,521
SOCIAL INDEX
82.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
68th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Norwegian Integration in Cherokee Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 467,594,005 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Norwegians within Cherokee communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.221. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Cherokee within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.008% in Norwegians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Cherokee corresponds to a decrease of 7.8 Norwegians.
Cherokee Integration in Norwegian Communities

Cherokee vs Norwegian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($86,125 compared to $103,682, a difference of 20.4%), median family income ($88,209 compared to $106,144, a difference of 20.3%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($80,843 compared to $96,866, a difference of 19.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 5.6%), householder income under 25 years ($47,848 compared to $53,127, a difference of 11.0%), and median female earnings ($34,742 compared to $38,802, a difference of 11.7%).
Cherokee vs Norwegian Income
Income MetricCherokeeNorwegian
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$37,203
Good
$44,480
Median Family Income
Tragic
$88,209
Excellent
$106,144
Median Household Income
Tragic
$72,682
Good
$86,084
Median Earnings
Tragic
$41,252
Good
$46,865
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$48,669
Excellent
$55,965
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$34,742
Poor
$38,802
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$47,848
Exceptional
$53,127
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$80,843
Good
$96,866
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$86,125
Excellent
$103,682
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$54,133
Average
$61,104
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.4%
Tragic
29.0%

Cherokee vs Norwegian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 55.1%), family poverty (10.6% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 53.8%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (19.5% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 50.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.7% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 9.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.0% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 17.9%), and single mother poverty (34.5% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 21.6%).
Cherokee vs Norwegian Poverty
Poverty MetricCherokeeNorwegian
Poverty
Tragic
14.4%
Exceptional
10.5%
Families
Tragic
10.6%
Exceptional
6.9%
Males
Tragic
13.1%
Exceptional
9.5%
Females
Tragic
15.6%
Exceptional
11.5%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
22.7%
Tragic
20.7%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
17.2%
Exceptional
12.6%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
21.7%
Exceptional
14.6%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.5%
Exceptional
13.0%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.7%
Exceptional
13.2%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
19.9%
Exceptional
13.3%
Single Males
Tragic
16.1%
Fair
12.9%
Single Females
Tragic
25.7%
Good
20.8%
Single Fathers
Tragic
19.6%
Exceptional
15.9%
Single Mothers
Tragic
34.5%
Exceptional
28.4%
Married Couples
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
3.7%
Seniors Over 65 years
Average
11.0%
Exceptional
8.7%
Seniors Over 75 years
Good
12.0%
Exceptional
10.2%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
13.2%
Exceptional
9.0%

Cherokee vs Norwegian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.2% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 30.9%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.7% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 30.7%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.3% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 29.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.8% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 0.56%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 8.4%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 9.1%).
Cherokee vs Norwegian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricCherokeeNorwegian
Unemployment
Fair
5.3%
Exceptional
4.2%
Males
Tragic
5.6%
Exceptional
4.4%
Females
Fair
5.3%
Exceptional
4.2%
Youth < 25
Fair
11.8%
Exceptional
9.8%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Poor
17.9%
Exceptional
14.5%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
10.5%
Exceptional
9.0%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.6%
Exceptional
6.0%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.4%
Exceptional
5.0%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.2%
Exceptional
4.0%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Poor
4.6%
Exceptional
3.9%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.0%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Poor
4.9%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Fair
5.4%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 65
Excellent
5.1%
Exceptional
4.7%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.8%
Tragic
9.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
9.3%
Exceptional
7.2%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
10.0%
Exceptional
8.3%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.7%
Exceptional
4.4%

Cherokee vs Norwegian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.2% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 14.8%), in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 6.9%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (76.2% compared to 81.0%, a difference of 6.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (82.1% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 4.9%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.6% compared to 85.7%, a difference of 5.1%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (81.4% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 5.2%).
Cherokee vs Norwegian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricCherokeeNorwegian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
61.9%
Exceptional
65.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
76.2%
Exceptional
81.0%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
40.2%
Exceptional
46.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
75.9%
Exceptional
80.1%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
82.1%
Exceptional
86.1%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
81.6%
Exceptional
85.7%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
81.4%
Exceptional
85.6%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
79.0%
Exceptional
84.4%

Cherokee vs Norwegian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (36.7% compared to 29.3%, a difference of 25.0%), single mother households (6.8% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 24.7%), and divorced or separated (13.7% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 13.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.5% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 0.49%), family households (65.0% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 1.7%), and average family size (3.18 compared to 3.08, a difference of 3.3%).
Cherokee vs Norwegian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricCherokeeNorwegian
Family Households
Exceptional
65.0%
Poor
63.9%
Family Households with Children
Average
27.5%
Fair
27.4%
Married-couple Households
Good
46.7%
Exceptional
49.5%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.18
Tragic
3.08
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.6%
Poor
2.4%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
6.8%
Exceptional
5.5%
Currently Married
Good
46.9%
Exceptional
50.2%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.7%
Fair
12.1%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
36.7%
Exceptional
29.3%

Cherokee vs Norwegian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 20.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.9% compared to 62.8%, a difference of 5.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 3.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.4% compared to 93.7%, a difference of 1.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 3.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 3.9%).
Cherokee vs Norwegian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricCherokeeNorwegian
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.7%
Exceptional
6.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.4%
Exceptional
93.7%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.9%
Exceptional
62.8%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
23.0%
Exceptional
23.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.7%
Exceptional
8.0%

Cherokee vs Norwegian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 29.0%), professional degree (3.3% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 27.2%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 26.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.40%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.40%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.41%).
Cherokee vs Norwegian Education Level
Education Level MetricCherokeeNorwegian
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.7%
Exceptional
1.3%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.7%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.7%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.7%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.7%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.6%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Exceptional
98.5%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Exceptional
98.4%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Exceptional
98.3%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.8%
Exceptional
97.8%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.5%
Exceptional
97.6%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.4%
Exceptional
96.9%
10th Grade
Excellent
94.1%
Exceptional
96.2%
11th Grade
Average
92.4%
Exceptional
95.2%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
90.5%
Exceptional
94.0%
High School Diploma
Poor
88.5%
Exceptional
92.5%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
83.9%
Exceptional
89.0%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
60.1%
Exceptional
68.4%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
53.2%
Exceptional
61.7%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
38.9%
Excellent
47.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
30.2%
Average
37.5%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.4%
Poor
14.0%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.3%
Fair
4.2%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Average
1.8%

Cherokee vs Norwegian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.9% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 42.2%), disability age 35 to 64 (15.5% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 34.8%), and ambulatory disability (7.9% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 33.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.8% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 5.7%), cognitive disability (18.0% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 8.9%), and disability age over 75 (50.2% compared to 45.5%, a difference of 10.3%).
Cherokee vs Norwegian Disability
Disability MetricCherokeeNorwegian
Disability
Tragic
14.8%
Tragic
12.2%
Males
Tragic
14.8%
Tragic
12.2%
Females
Tragic
14.9%
Fair
12.3%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.8%
Tragic
1.7%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.9%
Fair
5.7%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
8.7%
Tragic
7.6%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
15.5%
Fair
11.5%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
28.2%
Exceptional
22.5%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
50.2%
Exceptional
45.5%
Vision
Tragic
2.9%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Tragic
4.2%
Tragic
3.7%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.0%
Exceptional
16.5%
Ambulatory
Tragic
7.9%
Exceptional
5.9%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.9%
Exceptional
2.3%