Cherokee vs Brazilian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Cherokee
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Brazilian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Cherokee

Brazilians

Fair
Good
2,697
SOCIAL INDEX
24.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
243rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
6,919
SOCIAL INDEX
66.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
136th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Brazilian Integration in Cherokee Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 296,836,369 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Brazilians within Cherokee communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.189. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Cherokee within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.002% in Brazilians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Cherokee corresponds to a decrease of 2.2 Brazilians.
Cherokee Integration in Brazilian Communities

Cherokee vs Brazilian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Brazilian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($37,203 compared to $46,700, a difference of 25.5%), median household income ($72,682 compared to $88,934, a difference of 22.4%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($80,843 compared to $98,267, a difference of 21.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 2.6%), householder income over 65 years ($54,133 compared to $61,465, a difference of 13.5%), and householder income under 25 years ($47,848 compared to $54,335, a difference of 13.6%).
Cherokee vs Brazilian Income
Income MetricCherokeeBrazilian
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$37,203
Exceptional
$46,700
Median Family Income
Tragic
$88,209
Excellent
$106,942
Median Household Income
Tragic
$72,682
Exceptional
$88,934
Median Earnings
Tragic
$41,252
Exceptional
$48,356
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$48,669
Exceptional
$56,837
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$34,742
Excellent
$40,483
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$47,848
Exceptional
$54,335
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$80,843
Excellent
$98,267
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$86,125
Excellent
$104,408
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$54,133
Good
$61,465
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.4%
Tragic
26.7%

Cherokee vs Brazilian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Brazilian communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (16.1% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 36.6%), child poverty under the age of 5 (21.7% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 32.7%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.2% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 31.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.0% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 3.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.0% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 6.7%), and married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 14.7%).
Cherokee vs Brazilian Poverty
Poverty MetricCherokeeBrazilian
Poverty
Tragic
14.4%
Good
11.9%
Families
Tragic
10.6%
Excellent
8.6%
Males
Tragic
13.1%
Excellent
10.8%
Females
Tragic
15.6%
Excellent
13.0%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
22.7%
Exceptional
18.6%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
17.2%
Excellent
13.1%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
21.7%
Excellent
16.4%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.5%
Excellent
15.4%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.7%
Excellent
15.8%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
19.9%
Excellent
15.4%
Single Males
Tragic
16.1%
Exceptional
11.8%
Single Females
Tragic
25.7%
Exceptional
20.1%
Single Fathers
Tragic
19.6%
Exceptional
15.5%
Single Mothers
Tragic
34.5%
Exceptional
28.3%
Married Couples
Tragic
5.8%
Good
5.0%
Seniors Over 65 years
Average
11.0%
Poor
11.3%
Seniors Over 75 years
Good
12.0%
Tragic
12.8%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
13.2%
Excellent
11.1%

Cherokee vs Brazilian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Brazilian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.3% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 21.5%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 17.3%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.6% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 16.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.46%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.86%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.93%).
Cherokee vs Brazilian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricCherokeeBrazilian
Unemployment
Fair
5.3%
Average
5.3%
Males
Tragic
5.6%
Good
5.2%
Females
Fair
5.3%
Tragic
5.5%
Youth < 25
Fair
11.8%
Good
11.5%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Poor
17.9%
Exceptional
17.1%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
10.5%
Good
10.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.6%
Excellent
6.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.4%
Average
5.4%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.2%
Fair
4.7%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Poor
4.6%
Fair
4.6%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.0%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Poor
4.9%
Poor
5.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Fair
5.4%
Tragic
5.6%
Seniors > 65
Excellent
5.1%
Tragic
5.5%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.8%
Tragic
9.3%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
9.3%
Average
7.7%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
10.0%
Fair
9.1%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.7%
Tragic
5.8%

Cherokee vs Brazilian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Brazilian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (61.9% compared to 66.6%, a difference of 7.5%), in labor force | age 16-19 (40.2% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 7.3%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.9% compared to 75.8%, a difference of 0.20%), in labor force | age 25-29 (82.1% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 3.9%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (81.4% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 4.4%).
Cherokee vs Brazilian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricCherokeeBrazilian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
61.9%
Exceptional
66.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
76.2%
Exceptional
80.5%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
40.2%
Excellent
37.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
75.9%
Exceptional
75.8%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
82.1%
Exceptional
85.3%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
81.6%
Exceptional
85.4%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
81.4%
Exceptional
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
79.0%
Exceptional
83.7%

Cherokee vs Brazilian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Brazilian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (36.7% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 20.7%), single father households (2.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 17.7%), and divorced or separated (13.7% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 13.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.18 compared to 3.18, a difference of 0.020%), family households with children (27.5% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 0.60%), and currently married (46.9% compared to 46.4%, a difference of 1.0%).
Cherokee vs Brazilian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricCherokeeBrazilian
Family Households
Exceptional
65.0%
Poor
63.9%
Family Households with Children
Average
27.5%
Good
27.7%
Married-couple Households
Good
46.7%
Fair
46.2%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.18
Tragic
3.18
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.6%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
6.8%
Average
6.2%
Currently Married
Good
46.9%
Fair
46.4%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.7%
Average
12.1%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
36.7%
Excellent
30.4%

Cherokee vs Brazilian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Brazilian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 44.0%), no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 34.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 32.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.4% compared to 90.0%, a difference of 2.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.9% compared to 53.8%, a difference of 11.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 32.0%).
Cherokee vs Brazilian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricCherokeeBrazilian
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.7%
Average
10.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.4%
Good
90.0%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.9%
Tragic
53.8%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
23.0%
Tragic
17.4%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.7%
Tragic
5.4%

Cherokee vs Brazilian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Brazilian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.3% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 51.5%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 45.6%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 42.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (94.1% compared to 93.8%, a difference of 0.26%), nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.35%), and 11th grade (92.4% compared to 92.8%, a difference of 0.35%).
Cherokee vs Brazilian Education Level
Education Level MetricCherokeeBrazilian
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.7%
Good
2.1%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.3%
Average
98.0%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.3%
Average
97.9%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Average
97.9%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Average
97.9%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Average
97.8%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Average
97.5%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Fair
97.2%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Fair
96.9%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.8%
Fair
96.0%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.5%
Fair
95.6%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.4%
Average
94.9%
10th Grade
Excellent
94.1%
Good
93.8%
11th Grade
Average
92.4%
Good
92.8%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
90.5%
Good
91.3%
High School Diploma
Poor
88.5%
Good
89.3%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
83.9%
Good
86.3%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
60.1%
Good
65.9%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
53.2%
Good
60.5%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
38.9%
Exceptional
48.7%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
30.2%
Exceptional
40.8%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.4%
Exceptional
16.5%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.3%
Exceptional
5.0%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Exceptional
2.1%

Cherokee vs Brazilian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Brazilian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (15.5% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 47.3%), hearing disability (4.2% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 44.8%), and ambulatory disability (7.9% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 38.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.0% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 5.1%), disability age over 75 (50.2% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 8.1%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.9% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 16.9%).
Cherokee vs Brazilian Disability
Disability MetricCherokeeBrazilian
Disability
Tragic
14.8%
Exceptional
11.4%
Males
Tragic
14.8%
Excellent
10.9%
Females
Tragic
14.9%
Exceptional
11.8%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.8%
Tragic
1.5%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.9%
Tragic
5.9%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
8.7%
Excellent
6.4%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
15.5%
Exceptional
10.5%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
28.2%
Exceptional
22.4%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
50.2%
Exceptional
46.5%
Vision
Tragic
2.9%
Good
2.1%
Hearing
Tragic
4.2%
Good
2.9%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.0%
Good
17.1%
Ambulatory
Tragic
7.9%
Exceptional
5.7%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.9%
Exceptional
2.3%