Cherokee vs Immigrants from Latin America Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 482,145,746 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Latin America within Cherokee communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.270. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Cherokee within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.022% in Immigrants from Latin America. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Cherokee corresponds to a decrease of 21.9 Immigrants from Latin America.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from Latin America communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 23.7%, a difference of 15.5%), householder income under 25 years ($47,848 compared to $51,387, a difference of 7.4%), and median household income ($72,682 compared to $75,420, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median earnings ($41,252 compared to $41,049, a difference of 0.50%), per capita income ($37,203 compared to $36,823, a difference of 1.0%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($86,125 compared to $87,219, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from Latin America communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.0% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 30.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.0% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 29.1%), and married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 25.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 5 (21.7% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 2.2%), child poverty among girls under 16 (19.9% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 3.7%), and male poverty (13.1% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from Latin America communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (5.3% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 15.0%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.7% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 11.5%), and unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 11.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.66%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.6% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 2.1%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.4% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from Latin America communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.2% compared to 33.9%, a difference of 18.7%), in labor force | age > 16 (61.9% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 4.6%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (76.2% compared to 78.3%, a difference of 2.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (82.1% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 0.99%), in labor force | age 35-44 (81.4% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.6% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from Latin America communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.8% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 16.0%), divorced or separated (13.7% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 10.5%), and family households with children (27.5% compared to 29.7%, a difference of 8.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (36.7% compared to 37.1%, a difference of 1.3%), family households (65.0% compared to 67.2%, a difference of 3.5%), and married-couple households (46.7% compared to 44.7%, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from Latin America communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 33.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 11.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.9% compared to 54.3%, a difference of 10.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.4% compared to 89.8%, a difference of 2.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 8.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.9% compared to 54.3%, a difference of 10.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from Latin America communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 89.1%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 11.5%), and high school diploma (88.5% compared to 82.1%, a difference of 7.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of professional degree (3.3% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 0.15%), bachelor's degree (30.2% compared to 30.1%, a difference of 0.42%), and master's degree (11.4% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 0.86%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from Latin America communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.2% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 48.2%), disability age under 5 (1.8% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 45.0%), and disability age 18 to 34 (8.7% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 39.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (50.2% compared to 49.5%, a difference of 1.4%), cognitive disability (18.0% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 2.4%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 8.6%).