Cherokee vs Bhutanese Community Comparison

COMPARE

Cherokee
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Bhutanese
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Cherokee

Bhutanese

Fair
Exceptional
2,697
SOCIAL INDEX
24.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
243rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
10,144
SOCIAL INDEX
98.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
3rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Bhutanese Integration in Cherokee Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 414,868,736 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese within Cherokee communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.423. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Cherokee within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.016% in Bhutanese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Cherokee corresponds to a decrease of 16.4 Bhutanese.
Cherokee Integration in Bhutanese Communities

Cherokee vs Bhutanese Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($72,682 compared to $100,151, a difference of 37.8%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($86,125 compared to $117,750, a difference of 36.7%), and median family income ($88,209 compared to $119,800, a difference of 35.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 1.6%), householder income under 25 years ($47,848 compared to $57,078, a difference of 19.3%), and median female earnings ($34,742 compared to $43,648, a difference of 25.6%).
Cherokee vs Bhutanese Income
Income MetricCherokeeBhutanese
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$37,203
Exceptional
$49,894
Median Family Income
Tragic
$88,209
Exceptional
$119,800
Median Household Income
Tragic
$72,682
Exceptional
$100,151
Median Earnings
Tragic
$41,252
Exceptional
$52,297
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$48,669
Exceptional
$61,759
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$34,742
Exceptional
$43,648
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$47,848
Exceptional
$57,078
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$80,843
Exceptional
$109,520
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$86,125
Exceptional
$117,750
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$54,133
Exceptional
$72,288
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.4%
Tragic
27.0%

Cherokee vs Bhutanese Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (21.7% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 62.5%), child poverty among boys under 16 (19.7% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 56.5%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (19.9% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 56.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.0% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 13.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.0% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 17.3%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.7% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 24.6%).
Cherokee vs Bhutanese Poverty
Poverty MetricCherokeeBhutanese
Poverty
Tragic
14.4%
Exceptional
10.4%
Families
Tragic
10.6%
Exceptional
7.0%
Males
Tragic
13.1%
Exceptional
9.5%
Females
Tragic
15.6%
Exceptional
11.3%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
22.7%
Exceptional
18.2%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
17.2%
Exceptional
11.4%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
21.7%
Exceptional
13.4%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.5%
Exceptional
12.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.7%
Exceptional
12.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
19.9%
Exceptional
12.7%
Single Males
Tragic
16.1%
Exceptional
11.1%
Single Females
Tragic
25.7%
Exceptional
17.7%
Single Fathers
Tragic
19.6%
Exceptional
15.0%
Single Mothers
Tragic
34.5%
Exceptional
25.6%
Married Couples
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
4.1%
Seniors Over 65 years
Average
11.0%
Exceptional
9.3%
Seniors Over 75 years
Good
12.0%
Exceptional
10.6%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
13.2%
Exceptional
9.2%

Cherokee vs Bhutanese Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.3% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 39.0%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.0% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 24.5%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 22.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.8% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 5.3%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 5.4%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.5% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 5.4%).
Cherokee vs Bhutanese Unemployment
Unemployment MetricCherokeeBhutanese
Unemployment
Fair
5.3%
Exceptional
4.9%
Males
Tragic
5.6%
Exceptional
4.9%
Females
Fair
5.3%
Exceptional
4.9%
Youth < 25
Fair
11.8%
Exceptional
11.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Poor
17.9%
Exceptional
16.4%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
10.5%
Exceptional
10.0%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.6%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.4%
Exceptional
5.2%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.2%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Poor
4.6%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.0%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Poor
4.9%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Fair
5.4%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 65
Excellent
5.1%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.8%
Exceptional
8.0%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
9.3%
Exceptional
6.7%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
10.0%
Exceptional
8.1%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.7%
Exceptional
5.0%

Cherokee vs Bhutanese Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.2% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 10.9%), in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 5.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (61.9% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.9% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 0.62%), in labor force | age 25-29 (82.1% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 3.3%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (81.4% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 4.0%).
Cherokee vs Bhutanese Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricCherokeeBhutanese
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
61.9%
Excellent
65.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
76.2%
Exceptional
80.2%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
40.2%
Fair
36.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
75.9%
Excellent
75.4%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
82.1%
Good
84.8%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
81.6%
Excellent
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
81.4%
Excellent
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
79.0%
Exceptional
83.5%

Cherokee vs Bhutanese Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (36.7% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 31.6%), single mother households (6.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 29.1%), and single father households (2.6% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 24.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.5% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 0.75%), family households (65.0% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 1.4%), and average family size (3.18 compared to 3.25, a difference of 2.1%).
Cherokee vs Bhutanese Family Structure
Family Structure MetricCherokeeBhutanese
Family Households
Exceptional
65.0%
Exceptional
65.9%
Family Households with Children
Average
27.5%
Fair
27.3%
Married-couple Households
Good
46.7%
Exceptional
49.3%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.18
Excellent
3.25
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.6%
Exceptional
2.1%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
6.8%
Exceptional
5.3%
Currently Married
Good
46.9%
Exceptional
48.6%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.7%
Exceptional
11.2%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
36.7%
Exceptional
27.9%

Cherokee vs Bhutanese Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 12.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 3.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.9% compared to 59.1%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 0.75%), 1 or more vehicles in household (92.4% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 1.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.9% compared to 59.1%, a difference of 1.3%).
Cherokee vs Bhutanese Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricCherokeeBhutanese
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.7%
Exceptional
8.7%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.4%
Exceptional
91.4%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.9%
Exceptional
59.1%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
23.0%
Exceptional
22.2%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.7%
Exceptional
7.8%

Cherokee vs Bhutanese Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 65.2%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 59.8%), and master's degree (11.4% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 51.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.10%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.10%), and 8th grade (96.5% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 0.10%).
Cherokee vs Bhutanese Education Level
Education Level MetricCherokeeBhutanese
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.7%
Exceptional
1.8%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.2%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.2%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.2%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.1%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.1%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Exceptional
97.9%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Exceptional
97.7%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Exceptional
97.5%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.8%
Exceptional
96.6%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.5%
Exceptional
96.4%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.4%
Exceptional
95.7%
10th Grade
Excellent
94.1%
Exceptional
94.9%
11th Grade
Average
92.4%
Exceptional
94.0%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
90.5%
Exceptional
93.0%
High School Diploma
Poor
88.5%
Exceptional
91.2%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
83.9%
Exceptional
88.4%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
60.1%
Exceptional
70.3%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
53.2%
Exceptional
64.6%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
38.9%
Exceptional
51.4%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
30.2%
Exceptional
42.7%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.4%
Exceptional
17.2%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.3%
Exceptional
5.4%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Exceptional
2.3%

Cherokee vs Bhutanese Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (15.5% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 57.1%), disability age under 5 (1.8% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 51.4%), and vision disability (2.9% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 48.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (50.2% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 6.7%), cognitive disability (18.0% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 8.5%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 20.8%).
Cherokee vs Bhutanese Disability
Disability MetricCherokeeBhutanese
Disability
Tragic
14.8%
Exceptional
11.2%
Males
Tragic
14.8%
Excellent
11.0%
Females
Tragic
14.9%
Exceptional
11.5%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.8%
Exceptional
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.9%
Exceptional
4.9%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
8.7%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
15.5%
Exceptional
9.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
28.2%
Exceptional
21.5%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
50.2%
Good
47.1%
Vision
Tragic
2.9%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Tragic
4.2%
Tragic
3.2%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.0%
Exceptional
16.6%
Ambulatory
Tragic
7.9%
Exceptional
5.8%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.9%
Exceptional
2.4%