Cherokee vs Yakama Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 19,547,276 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Yakama within Cherokee communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.854. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Cherokee within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.835% in Yakama. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Cherokee corresponds to an increase of 1,835.3 Yakama.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 23.7%, a difference of 15.4%), householder income under 25 years ($47,848 compared to $54,321, a difference of 13.5%), and per capita income ($37,203 compared to $33,009, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median household income ($72,682 compared to $72,225, a difference of 0.63%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($86,125 compared to $86,992, a difference of 1.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($54,133 compared to $56,234, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (13.2% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 61.7%), married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 55.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.0% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 52.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (16.1% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 0.77%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.2% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 2.6%), and single mother poverty (34.5% compared to 36.4%, a difference of 5.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.8% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 87.1%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.0% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 78.8%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.4% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 53.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.0% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 1.4%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.2% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 7.8%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.6% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 15.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.2% compared to 36.9%, a difference of 9.1%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.6% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 3.1%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (81.4% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (61.9% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 0.31%), in labor force | age 20-64 (76.2% compared to 75.8%, a difference of 0.59%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.9% compared to 75.1%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.6% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 59.6%), single mother households (6.8% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 23.4%), and family households with children (27.5% compared to 30.8%, a difference of 12.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (46.7% compared to 45.2%, a difference of 3.3%), currently married (46.9% compared to 44.0%, a difference of 6.7%), and family households (65.0% compared to 69.3%, a difference of 6.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 67.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 34.8%), and no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 17.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.4% compared to 93.6%, a difference of 1.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.9% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 8.4%), and no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 17.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 104.3%), bachelor's degree (30.2% compared to 24.5%, a difference of 23.4%), and associate's degree (38.9% compared to 32.3%, a difference of 20.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 1.8%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 1.8%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.8% compared to 1.00%, a difference of 77.3%), vision disability (2.9% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 18.1%), and ambulatory disability (7.9% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 15.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.0% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 0.70%), disability age over 75 (50.2% compared to 51.3%, a difference of 2.1%), and disability age 18 to 34 (8.7% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 3.1%).