Cherokee vs Liberian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Cherokee
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Liberian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Cherokee

Liberians

Fair
Poor
2,697
SOCIAL INDEX
24.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
243rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,824
SOCIAL INDEX
15.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
286th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Liberian Integration in Cherokee Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 113,326,595 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Liberians within Cherokee communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.265. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Cherokee within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.008% in Liberians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Cherokee corresponds to a decrease of 8.3 Liberians.
Cherokee Integration in Liberian Communities

Cherokee vs Liberian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Liberian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 27.9%), median female earnings ($34,742 compared to $38,215, a difference of 10.0%), and median earnings ($41,252 compared to $43,536, a difference of 5.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($54,133 compared to $54,356, a difference of 0.41%), median male earnings ($48,669 compared to $49,318, a difference of 1.3%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($80,843 compared to $82,005, a difference of 1.4%).
Cherokee vs Liberian Income
Income MetricCherokeeLiberian
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$37,203
Tragic
$38,780
Median Family Income
Tragic
$88,209
Tragic
$91,722
Median Household Income
Tragic
$72,682
Tragic
$75,667
Median Earnings
Tragic
$41,252
Tragic
$43,536
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$48,669
Tragic
$49,318
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$34,742
Tragic
$38,215
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$47,848
Tragic
$48,917
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$80,843
Tragic
$82,005
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$86,125
Tragic
$88,929
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$54,133
Tragic
$54,356
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.4%
Exceptional
21.4%

Cherokee vs Liberian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Liberian communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (16.1% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 23.7%), single father poverty (19.6% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 22.7%), and single mother poverty (34.5% compared to 29.9%, a difference of 15.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family poverty (10.6% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 0.090%), child poverty among girls under 16 (19.9% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 0.18%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (19.5% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 0.29%).
Cherokee vs Liberian Poverty
Poverty MetricCherokeeLiberian
Poverty
Tragic
14.4%
Tragic
14.1%
Families
Tragic
10.6%
Tragic
10.6%
Males
Tragic
13.1%
Tragic
12.8%
Females
Tragic
15.6%
Tragic
15.4%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
22.7%
Poor
20.6%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
17.2%
Tragic
15.3%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
21.7%
Tragic
20.2%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.5%
Tragic
19.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.7%
Tragic
19.3%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
19.9%
Tragic
19.9%
Single Males
Tragic
16.1%
Fair
13.0%
Single Females
Tragic
25.7%
Tragic
22.4%
Single Fathers
Tragic
19.6%
Excellent
16.0%
Single Mothers
Tragic
34.5%
Poor
29.9%
Married Couples
Tragic
5.8%
Fair
5.4%
Seniors Over 65 years
Average
11.0%
Tragic
11.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Good
12.0%
Fair
12.5%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
13.2%
Tragic
14.8%

Cherokee vs Liberian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Liberian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.3% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 15.1%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.6% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 10.9%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 9.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.9% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 0.24%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.76%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.1%).
Cherokee vs Liberian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricCherokeeLiberian
Unemployment
Fair
5.3%
Tragic
5.6%
Males
Tragic
5.6%
Tragic
5.8%
Females
Fair
5.3%
Tragic
5.5%
Youth < 25
Fair
11.8%
Tragic
12.4%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Poor
17.9%
Poor
17.9%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
10.5%
Tragic
10.8%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.6%
Poor
6.8%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.4%
Tragic
5.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.2%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Poor
4.6%
Poor
4.6%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.0%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Poor
4.9%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Fair
5.4%
Tragic
5.8%
Seniors > 65
Excellent
5.1%
Tragic
5.6%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.8%
Tragic
10.2%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
9.3%
Tragic
8.1%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
10.0%
Tragic
10.8%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.7%
Tragic
6.0%

Cherokee vs Liberian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Liberian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (61.9% compared to 67.8%, a difference of 9.4%), in labor force | age 20-64 (76.2% compared to 80.9%, a difference of 6.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.6% compared to 86.4%, a difference of 5.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.9% compared to 78.0%, a difference of 2.7%), in labor force | age 16-19 (40.2% compared to 41.8%, a difference of 3.9%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.1% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 4.9%).
Cherokee vs Liberian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricCherokeeLiberian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
61.9%
Exceptional
67.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
76.2%
Exceptional
80.9%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
40.2%
Exceptional
41.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
75.9%
Exceptional
78.0%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
82.1%
Exceptional
86.1%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
81.6%
Exceptional
86.4%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
81.4%
Exceptional
85.7%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
79.0%
Excellent
83.0%

Cherokee vs Liberian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Liberian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.8% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 26.8%), married-couple households (46.7% compared to 40.7%, a difference of 14.9%), and currently married (46.9% compared to 42.2%, a difference of 11.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (36.7% compared to 37.4%, a difference of 1.9%), average family size (3.18 compared to 3.25, a difference of 2.1%), and family households with children (27.5% compared to 28.3%, a difference of 2.9%).
Cherokee vs Liberian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricCherokeeLiberian
Family Households
Exceptional
65.0%
Tragic
62.0%
Family Households with Children
Average
27.5%
Exceptional
28.3%
Married-couple Households
Good
46.7%
Tragic
40.7%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.18
Excellent
3.25
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.6%
Tragic
2.5%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
6.8%
Tragic
8.6%
Currently Married
Good
46.9%
Tragic
42.2%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.7%
Tragic
12.6%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
36.7%
Tragic
37.4%

Cherokee vs Liberian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Liberian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 54.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 47.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 35.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.4% compared to 88.0%, a difference of 4.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.9% compared to 51.7%, a difference of 15.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 35.2%).
Cherokee vs Liberian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricCherokeeLiberian
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.7%
Tragic
12.0%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.4%
Tragic
88.0%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.9%
Tragic
51.7%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
23.0%
Tragic
17.0%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.7%
Tragic
5.3%

Cherokee vs Liberian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Liberian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 36.3%), bachelor's degree (30.2% compared to 34.6%, a difference of 14.5%), and master's degree (11.4% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 13.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of high school diploma (88.5% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 0.12%), 11th grade (92.4% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.15%), and 12th grade, no diploma (90.5% compared to 90.8%, a difference of 0.35%).
Cherokee vs Liberian Education Level
Education Level MetricCherokeeLiberian
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.7%
Tragic
2.4%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
97.7%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
97.6%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
97.6%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
97.6%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
97.4%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Tragic
97.2%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Tragic
97.0%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Tragic
96.8%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.8%
Fair
95.9%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.5%
Fair
95.6%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.4%
Fair
94.8%
10th Grade
Excellent
94.1%
Fair
93.6%
11th Grade
Average
92.4%
Fair
92.3%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
90.5%
Poor
90.8%
High School Diploma
Poor
88.5%
Poor
88.7%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
83.9%
Poor
85.0%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
60.1%
Tragic
63.0%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
53.2%
Tragic
56.7%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
38.9%
Tragic
43.3%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
30.2%
Tragic
34.6%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.4%
Tragic
12.8%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.3%
Tragic
3.6%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Tragic
1.5%

Cherokee vs Liberian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Liberian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.2% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 47.6%), disability age under 5 (1.8% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 39.2%), and male disability (14.8% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 26.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.0% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 3.4%), disability age over 75 (50.2% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 4.6%), and disability age 65 to 74 (28.2% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 10.0%).
Cherokee vs Liberian Disability
Disability MetricCherokeeLiberian
Disability
Tragic
14.8%
Tragic
12.2%
Males
Tragic
14.8%
Tragic
11.8%
Females
Tragic
14.9%
Tragic
12.7%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.8%
Fair
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.9%
Tragic
6.0%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
8.7%
Tragic
7.1%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
15.5%
Tragic
12.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
28.2%
Tragic
25.6%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
50.2%
Tragic
48.0%
Vision
Tragic
2.9%
Tragic
2.3%
Hearing
Tragic
4.2%
Excellent
2.8%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.0%
Tragic
18.6%
Ambulatory
Tragic
7.9%
Tragic
6.3%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.9%
Tragic
2.6%