Cherokee vs Immigrants from Uruguay Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 124,565,324 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Uruguay within Cherokee communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.170. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Cherokee within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.011% in Immigrants from Uruguay. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Cherokee corresponds to a decrease of 10.9 Immigrants from Uruguay.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($37,203 compared to $43,997, a difference of 18.3%), median household income ($72,682 compared to $82,560, a difference of 13.6%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($80,843 compared to $91,171, a difference of 12.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($54,133 compared to $56,975, a difference of 5.2%), median male earnings ($48,669 compared to $52,860, a difference of 8.6%), and householder income under 25 years ($47,848 compared to $52,302, a difference of 9.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (16.1% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 35.4%), single father poverty (19.6% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 26.1%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.2% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 25.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 0.88%), receiving food stamps (13.2% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 5.7%), and family poverty (10.6% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 11.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.8% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 31.0%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.3% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 21.6%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 19.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.32%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 1.7%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.9% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.2% compared to 34.4%, a difference of 17.0%), in labor force | age > 16 (61.9% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 6.5%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.9% compared to 74.6%, a difference of 1.8%), in labor force | age 25-29 (82.1% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 3.4%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.6% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (13.7% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 9.0%), births to unmarried women (36.7% compared to 33.9%, a difference of 8.2%), and single father households (2.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 8.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.5% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 0.43%), single mother households (6.8% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 1.2%), and average family size (3.18 compared to 3.23, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 54.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 43.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 34.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.4% compared to 88.1%, a difference of 4.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.9% compared to 51.4%, a difference of 16.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 34.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.3% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 38.5%), no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 33.8%), and master's degree (11.4% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 31.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (90.5% compared to 90.0%, a difference of 0.55%), nursery school (98.3% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.66%), and kindergarten (98.3% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.66%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.2% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 53.1%), disability age 35 to 64 (15.5% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 49.4%), and disability age under 5 (1.8% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 44.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.0% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 6.0%), disability age over 75 (50.2% compared to 46.4%, a difference of 8.1%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 19.2%).