Cherokee vs Immigrants from South Africa Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 219,683,526 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South Africa within Cherokee communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.076. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Cherokee within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.005% in Immigrants from South Africa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Cherokee corresponds to a decrease of 4.6 Immigrants from South Africa.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from South Africa communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($37,203 compared to $51,465, a difference of 38.3%), median family income ($88,209 compared to $116,286, a difference of 31.8%), and median household income ($72,682 compared to $95,800, a difference of 31.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 4.0%), householder income under 25 years ($47,848 compared to $51,705, a difference of 8.1%), and median female earnings ($34,742 compared to $42,508, a difference of 22.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from South Africa communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (21.7% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 37.3%), receiving food stamps (13.2% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 36.7%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.2% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 35.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.0% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 4.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.0% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 9.4%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.7% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 10.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from South Africa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.3% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 27.3%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.8% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 23.6%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 20.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.8%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 2.6%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.5% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from South Africa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.2% compared to 36.8%, a difference of 9.5%), in labor force | age > 16 (61.9% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 5.4%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 4.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.9% compared to 74.9%, a difference of 1.3%), in labor force | age 25-29 (82.1% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 3.4%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (81.4% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from South Africa communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.6% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 25.6%), births to unmarried women (36.7% compared to 29.3%, a difference of 24.9%), and single mother households (6.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 18.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.5% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 0.10%), average family size (3.18 compared to 3.16, a difference of 0.79%), and family households (65.0% compared to 63.7%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from South Africa communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 26.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 24.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 17.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.4% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 2.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.9% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 5.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 17.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from South Africa communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.3% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 82.0%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 68.1%), and master's degree (11.4% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 65.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (96.5% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 0.0%), nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.040%), and kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.040%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from South Africa communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.8% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 53.5%), disability age 35 to 64 (15.5% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 49.7%), and vision disability (2.9% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 41.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.0% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 7.6%), disability age over 75 (50.2% compared to 45.3%, a difference of 10.8%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 26.1%).