Cherokee vs French Canadian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Cherokee
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
French Canadian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Cherokee

French Canadians

Fair
Average
2,697
SOCIAL INDEX
24.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
243rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
5,542
SOCIAL INDEX
52.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
175th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

French Canadian Integration in Cherokee Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 446,032,307 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of French Canadians within Cherokee communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.088. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Cherokee within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.003% in French Canadians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Cherokee corresponds to an increase of 3.3 French Canadians.
Cherokee Integration in French Canadian Communities

Cherokee vs French Canadian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Cherokee and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($80,843 compared to $93,694, a difference of 15.9%), per capita income ($37,203 compared to $43,003, a difference of 15.6%), and median family income ($88,209 compared to $101,634, a difference of 15.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 2.4%), householder income over 65 years ($54,133 compared to $57,975, a difference of 7.1%), and householder income under 25 years ($47,848 compared to $52,672, a difference of 10.1%).
Cherokee vs French Canadian Income
Income MetricCherokeeFrench Canadian
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$37,203
Fair
$43,003
Median Family Income
Tragic
$88,209
Fair
$101,634
Median Household Income
Tragic
$72,682
Poor
$82,810
Median Earnings
Tragic
$41,252
Fair
$46,026
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$48,669
Average
$54,722
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$34,742
Tragic
$38,436
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$47,848
Good
$52,672
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$80,843
Fair
$93,694
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$86,125
Fair
$99,093
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$54,133
Tragic
$57,975
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.4%
Tragic
28.1%

Cherokee vs French Canadian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Cherokee and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 35.6%), family poverty (10.6% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 30.2%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (19.5% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 25.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.0% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 5.3%), single father poverty (19.6% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 5.8%), and single male poverty (16.1% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 10.1%).
Cherokee vs French Canadian Poverty
Poverty MetricCherokeeFrench Canadian
Poverty
Tragic
14.4%
Exceptional
11.6%
Families
Tragic
10.6%
Exceptional
8.1%
Males
Tragic
13.1%
Exceptional
10.5%
Females
Tragic
15.6%
Exceptional
12.7%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
22.7%
Good
19.9%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
17.2%
Tragic
14.3%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
21.7%
Fair
17.7%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.5%
Good
15.6%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.7%
Good
15.9%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
19.9%
Good
16.1%
Single Males
Tragic
16.1%
Tragic
14.6%
Single Females
Tragic
25.7%
Tragic
22.2%
Single Fathers
Tragic
19.6%
Tragic
18.6%
Single Mothers
Tragic
34.5%
Tragic
30.8%
Married Couples
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
4.2%
Seniors Over 65 years
Average
11.0%
Exceptional
9.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Good
12.0%
Exceptional
11.4%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
13.2%
Good
11.4%

Cherokee vs French Canadian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Cherokee and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.8% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 13.6%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.3% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 11.1%), and female unemployment (5.3% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 11.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.0% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 2.7%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 3.2%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.5% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 3.3%).
Cherokee vs French Canadian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricCherokeeFrench Canadian
Unemployment
Fair
5.3%
Exceptional
4.9%
Males
Tragic
5.6%
Excellent
5.1%
Females
Fair
5.3%
Exceptional
4.8%
Youth < 25
Fair
11.8%
Exceptional
11.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Poor
17.9%
Exceptional
16.8%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
10.5%
Good
10.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.6%
Tragic
7.0%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.4%
Tragic
5.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.2%
Poor
4.8%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Poor
4.6%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.0%
Excellent
4.8%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Poor
4.9%
Excellent
4.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Fair
5.4%
Tragic
5.6%
Seniors > 65
Excellent
5.1%
Tragic
5.4%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.8%
Tragic
11.2%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
9.3%
Tragic
8.4%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
10.0%
Tragic
10.3%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.7%
Excellent
5.2%

Cherokee vs French Canadian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Cherokee and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.2% compared to 43.6%, a difference of 8.3%), in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 82.5%, a difference of 4.4%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.6% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 3.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.9% compared to 78.1%, a difference of 2.8%), in labor force | age > 16 (61.9% compared to 64.0%, a difference of 3.3%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (81.4% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 3.6%).
Cherokee vs French Canadian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricCherokeeFrench Canadian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
61.9%
Tragic
64.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
76.2%
Tragic
79.2%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
40.2%
Exceptional
43.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
75.9%
Exceptional
78.1%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
82.1%
Exceptional
85.2%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
81.6%
Good
84.8%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
81.4%
Average
84.3%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
79.0%
Poor
82.5%

Cherokee vs French Canadian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Cherokee and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.8% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 12.8%), single father households (2.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 9.9%), and divorced or separated (13.7% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 6.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (46.7% compared to 47.5%, a difference of 1.7%), family households (65.0% compared to 63.7%, a difference of 2.0%), and currently married (46.9% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 2.3%).
Cherokee vs French Canadian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricCherokeeFrench Canadian
Family Households
Exceptional
65.0%
Tragic
63.7%
Family Households with Children
Average
27.5%
Tragic
26.1%
Married-couple Households
Good
46.7%
Exceptional
47.5%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.18
Tragic
3.07
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.6%
Fair
2.4%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
6.8%
Excellent
6.0%
Currently Married
Good
46.9%
Exceptional
48.0%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.7%
Tragic
12.8%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
36.7%
Tragic
34.4%

Cherokee vs French Canadian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Cherokee and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 17.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 11.7%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.9% compared to 58.9%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.4% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.090%), no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 1.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.9% compared to 58.9%, a difference of 1.7%).
Cherokee vs French Canadian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricCherokeeFrench Canadian
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.7%
Exceptional
7.8%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.4%
Exceptional
92.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.9%
Exceptional
58.9%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
23.0%
Exceptional
20.6%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.7%
Excellent
6.6%

Cherokee vs French Canadian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Cherokee and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (11.4% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 23.9%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 22.7%), and professional degree (3.3% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 21.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.24%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.24%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.25%).
Cherokee vs French Canadian Education Level
Education Level MetricCherokeeFrench Canadian
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.7%
Exceptional
1.5%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.6%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.6%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.5%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.5%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.4%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Exceptional
98.3%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Exceptional
98.2%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Exceptional
98.0%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.8%
Exceptional
97.4%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.5%
Exceptional
97.2%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.4%
Exceptional
96.3%
10th Grade
Excellent
94.1%
Exceptional
95.3%
11th Grade
Average
92.4%
Exceptional
94.0%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
90.5%
Exceptional
92.6%
High School Diploma
Poor
88.5%
Exceptional
90.9%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
83.9%
Exceptional
86.9%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
60.1%
Poor
64.2%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
53.2%
Poor
57.8%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
38.9%
Poor
44.9%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
30.2%
Tragic
35.6%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.4%
Poor
14.1%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.3%
Tragic
4.0%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Fair
1.8%

Cherokee vs French Canadian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Cherokee and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.9% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 27.9%), disability age 35 to 64 (15.5% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 19.7%), and disability age 65 to 74 (28.2% compared to 23.7%, a difference of 18.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (6.9% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 3.2%), cognitive disability (18.0% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 5.4%), and disability age under 5 (1.8% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 6.1%).
Cherokee vs French Canadian Disability
Disability MetricCherokeeFrench Canadian
Disability
Tragic
14.8%
Tragic
13.4%
Males
Tragic
14.8%
Tragic
13.3%
Females
Tragic
14.9%
Tragic
13.6%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.8%
Tragic
1.9%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.9%
Tragic
6.7%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
8.7%
Tragic
8.1%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
15.5%
Tragic
12.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
28.2%
Fair
23.7%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
50.2%
Good
47.0%
Vision
Tragic
2.9%
Tragic
2.3%
Hearing
Tragic
4.2%
Tragic
3.8%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.0%
Excellent
17.1%
Ambulatory
Tragic
7.9%
Tragic
6.7%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.9%
Tragic
2.6%