Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Utilities in Indiana

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Utilities
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Indiana
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Utilities in Indiana

0.0%
100.0%
Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Utilities in Indiana Map

Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Utilities in Indiana

City % Employed vs State vs National
1. Blocher 100.0% 0.79% (+99.2)#1 0.84% (+99.2)#2
2. Hobbs 60.4% 0.79% (+59.6)#2 0.84% (+59.6)#19
3. Vicksburg 51.7% 0.79% (+50.9)#3 0.84% (+50.9)#30
4. Sandusky 40.0% 0.79% (+39.2)#4 0.84% (+39.2)#49
5. Deer Creek 38.6% 0.79% (+37.8)#5 0.84% (+37.8)#52
6. Chili 28.9% 0.79% (+28.2)#6 0.84% (+28.1)#89
7. Westphalia 28.6% 0.79% (+27.8)#7 0.84% (+27.7)#92
8. Alford 27.7% 0.79% (+26.9)#8 0.84% (+26.8)#96
9. Rob Roy 25.0% 0.79% (+24.2)#9 0.84% (+24.2)#115
10. Blairsville 22.9% 0.79% (+22.1)#10 0.84% (+22.0)#135
11. Cory 19.8% 0.79% (+19.0)#11 0.84% (+18.9)#178
12. Judyville 18.5% 0.79% (+17.8)#12 0.84% (+17.7)#199
13. Stanford 16.7% 0.79% (+16.0)#13 0.84% (+15.9)#234
14. Yeoman 15.2% 0.79% (+14.4)#14 0.84% (+14.3)#278
15. East Enterprise 14.3% 0.79% (+13.5)#15 0.84% (+13.4)#312
16. Winslow 12.9% 0.79% (+12.1)#16 0.84% (+12.1)#359
17. Straughn 11.4% 0.79% (+10.6)#17 0.84% (+10.5)#447
18. Schnellville 10.4% 0.79% (+9.58)#18 0.84% (+9.53)#498
19. Jonesville 8.2% 0.79% (+7.37)#19 0.84% (+7.33)#702
20. Tri Lakes 7.9% 0.79% (+7.10)#20 0.84% (+7.05)#746
21. Glezen 7.6% 0.79% (+6.79)#21 0.84% (+6.74)#781
22. Monroeville 7.5% 0.79% (+6.76)#22 0.84% (+6.71)#784
23. Petersburg 7.5% 0.79% (+6.75)#23 0.84% (+6.70)#786
24. Herbst 6.9% 0.79% (+6.14)#24 0.84% (+6.09)#874
25. Spurgeon 6.6% 0.79% (+5.79)#25 0.84% (+5.74)#959
26. Cedar Grove 6.5% 0.79% (+5.69)#26 0.84% (+5.64)#986
27. Aberdeen 6.3% 0.79% (+5.49)#27 0.84% (+5.44)#1,027
28. Laconia 5.9% 0.79% (+5.09)#28 0.84% (+5.05)#1,140
29. Arcola 5.5% 0.79% (+4.69)#29 0.84% (+4.64)#1,261
30. Homecroft 5.2% 0.79% (+4.40)#30 0.84% (+4.36)#1,379
31. Losantville 5.2% 0.79% (+4.40)#31 0.84% (+4.35)#1,384
32. Merom 5.1% 0.79% (+4.29)#32 0.84% (+4.25)#1,430
33. Carthage 4.8% 0.79% (+4.02)#33 0.84% (+3.98)#1,550
34. Lake Dalecarlia 4.8% 0.79% (+3.99)#34 0.84% (+3.94)#1,561
35. Lakewood 4.7% 0.79% (+3.88)#35 0.84% (+3.83)#1,624
36. New Market 4.7% 0.79% (+3.88)#36 0.84% (+3.83)#1,625
37. Chandler 4.5% 0.79% (+3.69)#37 0.84% (+3.65)#1,739
38. Hardinsburg 4.3% 0.79% (+3.47)#38 0.84% (+3.42)#1,873
39. Cayuga 4.2% 0.79% (+3.41)#39 0.84% (+3.36)#1,900
40. Hudson 4.0% 0.79% (+3.26)#40 0.84% (+3.21)#2,007
41. Arcadia 4.0% 0.79% (+3.20)#41 0.84% (+3.15)#2,047
42. Cynthiana 4.0% 0.79% (+3.19)#42 0.84% (+3.15)#2,051
43. Hatfield 3.9% 0.79% (+3.14)#43 0.84% (+3.10)#2,090
44. Fountain City 3.7% 0.79% (+2.87)#44 0.84% (+2.82)#2,325
45. San Pierre 3.4% 0.79% (+2.63)#45 0.84% (+2.58)#2,524
46. Rising Sun 3.4% 0.79% (+2.61)#46 0.84% (+2.57)#2,535
47. Claypool 3.4% 0.79% (+2.60)#47 0.84% (+2.55)#2,552
48. Fish Lake 3.2% 0.79% (+2.43)#48 0.84% (+2.38)#2,727
49. Moores Hill 3.2% 0.79% (+2.41)#49 0.84% (+2.36)#2,744
50. Madison 3.2% 0.79% (+2.40)#50 0.84% (+2.36)#2,749
51. Owensville 3.2% 0.79% (+2.40)#51 0.84% (+2.35)#2,754
52. Rochester 3.2% 0.79% (+2.39)#52 0.84% (+2.34)#2,760
53. Attica 3.2% 0.79% (+2.36)#53 0.84% (+2.32)#2,783
54. Edwardsport 3.1% 0.79% (+2.36)#54 0.84% (+2.31)#2,785
55. Rockport 3.1% 0.79% (+2.36)#55 0.84% (+2.31)#2,789
56. Westville 3.0% 0.79% (+2.17)#56 0.84% (+2.12)#3,000
57. New Whiteland 2.9% 0.79% (+2.08)#57 0.84% (+2.03)#3,104
58. Monon 2.8% 0.79% (+1.96)#58 0.84% (+1.92)#3,279
59. Marengo 2.7% 0.79% (+1.94)#59 0.84% (+1.90)#3,303
60. Roachdale 2.6% 0.79% (+1.83)#60 0.84% (+1.78)#3,478
61. Haubstadt 2.6% 0.79% (+1.82)#61 0.84% (+1.78)#3,481
62. Sidney 2.6% 0.79% (+1.77)#62 0.84% (+1.73)#3,565
63. Greenville 2.5% 0.79% (+1.72)#63 0.84% (+1.68)#3,632
64. Chrisney 2.5% 0.79% (+1.69)#64 0.84% (+1.64)#3,698
65. Martinsville 2.5% 0.79% (+1.66)#65 0.84% (+1.62)#3,736
66. Shadeland 2.4% 0.79% (+1.66)#66 0.84% (+1.61)#3,739
67. Rosedale 2.4% 0.79% (+1.62)#67 0.84% (+1.57)#3,816
68. Fulton 2.4% 0.79% (+1.59)#68 0.84% (+1.54)#3,857
69. Town Of Pines 2.3% 0.79% (+1.55)#69 0.84% (+1.50)#3,927
70. Dublin 2.3% 0.79% (+1.51)#70 0.84% (+1.47)#4,002
71. Farmersburg 2.3% 0.79% (+1.50)#71 0.84% (+1.45)#4,035
72. Campbellsburg 2.3% 0.79% (+1.48)#72 0.84% (+1.44)#4,062
73. Country Club Heights 2.3% 0.79% (+1.48)#73 0.84% (+1.44)#4,068
74. Swayzee 2.2% 0.79% (+1.45)#74 0.84% (+1.40)#4,123
75. Advance 2.2% 0.79% (+1.39)#75 0.84% (+1.35)#4,226
76. Romney 2.2% 0.79% (+1.38)#76 0.84% (+1.34)#4,248
77. Highland 2.2% 0.79% (+1.36)#77 0.84% (+1.32)#4,298
78. Trail Creek 2.1% 0.79% (+1.32)#78 0.84% (+1.27)#4,401
79. Leavenworth 2.1% 0.79% (+1.32)#79 0.84% (+1.27)#4,412
80. Elberfeld 2.1% 0.79% (+1.27)#80 0.84% (+1.23)#4,499
81. Floyds Knobs 2.1% 0.79% (+1.27)#81 0.84% (+1.22)#4,514
82. Carlisle 2.0% 0.79% (+1.25)#82 0.84% (+1.20)#4,552
83. Union City 2.0% 0.79% (+1.22)#83 0.84% (+1.17)#4,640
84. Upland 2.0% 0.79% (+1.22)#84 0.84% (+1.17)#4,643
85. Waterloo 2.0% 0.79% (+1.22)#85 0.84% (+1.17)#4,644
86. Flora 2.0% 0.79% (+1.18)#86 0.84% (+1.13)#4,723
87. Mackey 1.9% 0.79% (+1.13)#87 0.84% (+1.09)#4,834
88. Atlanta 1.9% 0.79% (+1.13)#88 0.84% (+1.08)#4,852
89. Santa Claus 1.9% 0.79% (+1.12)#89 0.84% (+1.07)#4,876
90. Kingsbury 1.9% 0.79% (+1.11)#90 0.84% (+1.07)#4,886
91. Wheatfield 1.9% 0.79% (+1.11)#91 0.84% (+1.07)#4,889
92. Glenwood 1.9% 0.79% (+1.11)#92 0.84% (+1.06)#4,895
93. Princeton 1.9% 0.79% (+1.11)#93 0.84% (+1.06)#4,896
94. Indian Village 1.9% 0.79% (+1.06)#94 0.84% (+1.01)#5,026
95. Hamilton 1.8% 0.79% (+1.06)#95 0.84% (+1.01)#5,031
96. Clayton 1.8% 0.79% (+1.06)#96 0.84% (+1.01)#5,035
97. Clear Lake 1.8% 0.79% (+1.04)#97 0.84% (+0.992)#5,079
98. Osgood 1.8% 0.79% (+1.00)#98 0.84% (+0.957)#5,184
99. Roanoke 1.8% 0.79% (+1.00)#99 0.84% (+0.956)#5,187
100. New Carlisle 1.8% 0.79% (+0.975)#100 0.84% (+0.928)#5,268

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Utilities in Indiana?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Utilities in Indiana are:
#1
28.6%
#2
15.2%
#3
14.3%
#4
12.9%
#5
11.4%
#6
8.2%
#7
7.9%
#8
7.5%
#9
7.5%
#10
6.9%
What city has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Utilities in Indiana?
Westphalia has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Utilities in Indiana with 28.6%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Utilities in the State of Indiana?
Percentage of Population Employed in Utilities in Indiana is 0.79%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Utilities in the United States?
Percentage of Population Employed in Utilities in the United States is 0.84%.