Cities with the Highest Male Poverty Level in Indiana

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Highest Poverty | Male
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Indiana
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Male Poverty Level in Indiana

0.0%
100.0%
Cities with the Highest Male Poverty Level in Indiana Map

Cities with the Highest Male Poverty Level in Indiana

City Male Poverty vs State vs National
1. Millville 100.0% 11.1% (+88.9)#1 11.3% (+88.7)#18
2. Pence 100.0% 11.1% (+88.9)#2 11.3% (+88.7)#22
3. Linn Grove 100.0% 11.1% (+88.9)#3 11.3% (+88.7)#31
4. Penntown 100.0% 11.1% (+88.9)#4 11.3% (+88.7)#45
5. Lake View 100.0% 11.1% (+88.9)#5 11.3% (+88.7)#48
6. Fredericksburg 100.0% 11.1% (+88.9)#6 11.3% (+88.7)#72
7. Burney 100.0% 11.1% (+88.9)#7 11.3% (+88.7)#82
8. Lawrenceport 100.0% 11.1% (+88.9)#8 11.3% (+88.7)#89
9. Cates 91.4% 11.1% (+80.3)#9 11.3% (+80.1)#137
10. Grayford 80.0% 11.1% (+68.9)#10 11.3% (+68.7)#200
11. Arthur 74.2% 11.1% (+63.2)#11 11.3% (+62.9)#254
12. Centerton 70.5% 11.1% (+59.5)#12 11.3% (+59.2)#304
13. Mauckport 65.0% 11.1% (+53.9)#13 11.3% (+53.7)#391
14. Burnett 64.7% 11.1% (+53.7)#14 11.3% (+53.4)#393
15. Florence 60.0% 11.1% (+48.9)#15 11.3% (+48.7)#502
16. Otisco 59.1% 11.1% (+48.0)#16 11.3% (+47.7)#538
17. Azalia 58.2% 11.1% (+47.2)#17 11.3% (+46.9)#562
18. Notre Dame 56.7% 11.1% (+45.7)#18 11.3% (+45.4)#601
19. Eckerty 53.1% 11.1% (+42.1)#19 11.3% (+41.8)#732
20. Letts 52.2% 11.1% (+41.1)#20 11.3% (+40.8)#764
21. Hartz Lake 51.1% 11.1% (+40.1)#21 11.3% (+39.8)#812
22. Adams 50.6% 11.1% (+39.5)#22 11.3% (+39.2)#842
23. Leiters Ford 50.5% 11.1% (+39.4)#23 11.3% (+39.1)#847
24. English 49.8% 11.1% (+38.8)#24 11.3% (+38.5)#894
25. Cross Plains 47.5% 11.1% (+36.4)#25 11.3% (+36.2)#1,010
26. Groverton 47.3% 11.1% (+36.3)#26 11.3% (+36.0)#1,023
27. St. Omer 45.7% 11.1% (+34.6)#27 11.3% (+34.3)#1,125
28. Eugene 45.5% 11.1% (+34.4)#28 11.3% (+34.1)#1,132
29. Butlerville 44.3% 11.1% (+33.3)#29 11.3% (+33.0)#1,204
30. Prairie Creek 43.2% 11.1% (+32.2)#30 11.3% (+31.9)#1,274
31. Brimfield 43.0% 11.1% (+31.9)#31 11.3% (+31.6)#1,295
32. Paris Crossing 42.9% 11.1% (+31.8)#32 11.3% (+31.5)#1,312
33. West Lafayette 42.4% 11.1% (+31.3)#33 11.3% (+31.0)#1,351
34. Williams 42.4% 11.1% (+31.3)#34 11.3% (+31.0)#1,354
35. Hardinsburg 41.7% 11.1% (+30.6)#35 11.3% (+30.3)#1,404
36. Redkey 41.2% 11.1% (+30.1)#36 11.3% (+29.8)#1,453
37. Ambia 40.7% 11.1% (+29.6)#37 11.3% (+29.3)#1,518
38. Van Bibber Lake 39.5% 11.1% (+28.4)#38 11.3% (+28.2)#1,623
39. Lewis 38.6% 11.1% (+27.5)#39 11.3% (+27.2)#1,729
40. Deer Creek 37.5% 11.1% (+26.4)#40 11.3% (+26.2)#1,842
41. Anoka 37.4% 11.1% (+26.4)#41 11.3% (+26.1)#1,860
42. Boston 36.5% 11.1% (+25.4)#42 11.3% (+25.1)#1,966
43. Patriot 36.1% 11.1% (+25.1)#43 11.3% (+24.8)#2,014
44. Lake Bruce 35.8% 11.1% (+24.8)#44 11.3% (+24.5)#2,049
45. Lake Village 35.6% 11.1% (+24.5)#45 11.3% (+24.2)#2,077
46. Rockfield 35.5% 11.1% (+24.4)#46 11.3% (+24.1)#2,083
47. Cass 35.0% 11.1% (+23.9)#47 11.3% (+23.7)#2,157
48. Otwell 34.8% 11.1% (+23.7)#48 11.3% (+23.4)#2,180
49. Switz City 34.5% 11.1% (+23.5)#49 11.3% (+23.2)#2,213
50. Marengo 34.5% 11.1% (+23.4)#50 11.3% (+23.1)#2,227
51. Pleasantville 34.4% 11.1% (+23.3)#51 11.3% (+23.0)#2,245
52. Roseland 33.5% 11.1% (+22.4)#52 11.3% (+22.2)#2,355
53. Royerton 33.3% 11.1% (+22.3)#53 11.3% (+22.0)#2,379
54. Alamo 33.3% 11.1% (+22.3)#54 11.3% (+22.0)#2,392
55. Dubois 32.7% 11.1% (+21.7)#55 11.3% (+21.4)#2,491
56. Scott 32.2% 11.1% (+21.2)#56 11.3% (+20.9)#2,568
57. North Grove 31.8% 11.1% (+20.8)#57 11.3% (+20.5)#2,645
58. Cromwell 31.7% 11.1% (+20.6)#58 11.3% (+20.3)#2,672
59. Laconia 31.2% 11.1% (+20.2)#59 11.3% (+19.9)#2,732
60. Pulaski 31.2% 11.1% (+20.2)#60 11.3% (+19.9)#2,734
61. Bloomington 31.0% 11.1% (+20.0)#61 11.3% (+19.7)#2,780
62. Alford 31.0% 11.1% (+19.9)#62 11.3% (+19.6)#2,797
63. Grantsburg 30.8% 11.1% (+19.7)#63 11.3% (+19.4)#2,833
64. Coal 30.8% 11.1% (+19.7)#64 11.3% (+19.4)#2,835
65. Monroe City 30.7% 11.1% (+19.7)#65 11.3% (+19.4)#2,840
66. Bear Lake 30.4% 11.1% (+19.3)#66 11.3% (+19.0)#2,897
67. Boswell 30.2% 11.1% (+19.2)#67 11.3% (+18.9)#2,935
68. Gary 30.0% 11.1% (+18.9)#68 11.3% (+18.6)#2,990
69. Billtown 29.3% 11.1% (+18.3)#69 11.3% (+18.0)#3,130
70. Fountaintown 29.0% 11.1% (+17.9)#70 11.3% (+17.6)#3,206
71. Muncie 28.9% 11.1% (+17.8)#71 11.3% (+17.5)#3,234
72. Merom 28.4% 11.1% (+17.4)#72 11.3% (+17.1)#3,343
73. Salem 28.2% 11.1% (+17.1)#73 11.3% (+16.8)#3,402
74. Tennyson 28.0% 11.1% (+17.0)#74 11.3% (+16.7)#3,434
75. Kewanna 28.0% 11.1% (+16.9)#75 11.3% (+16.6)#3,444
76. Kingsbury 27.9% 11.1% (+16.8)#76 11.3% (+16.5)#3,475
77. La Paz 27.8% 11.1% (+16.7)#77 11.3% (+16.4)#3,492
78. Cannelton 27.5% 11.1% (+16.4)#78 11.3% (+16.2)#3,566
79. North Crows Nest 27.3% 11.1% (+16.2)#79 11.3% (+15.9)#3,634
80. Pittsburg 27.0% 11.1% (+15.9)#80 11.3% (+15.6)#3,712
81. Riley 27.0% 11.1% (+15.9)#81 11.3% (+15.6)#3,717
82. Waldron 26.6% 11.1% (+15.6)#82 11.3% (+15.3)#3,803
83. Lakeville 26.6% 11.1% (+15.6)#83 11.3% (+15.3)#3,804
84. Millersburg 26.1% 11.1% (+15.0)#84 11.3% (+14.7)#3,977
85. Worthington 25.9% 11.1% (+14.8)#85 11.3% (+14.6)#4,026
86. Dillsboro 25.9% 11.1% (+14.8)#86 11.3% (+14.5)#4,033
87. Royal Center 25.6% 11.1% (+14.5)#87 11.3% (+14.2)#4,125
88. Terre Haute 25.1% 11.1% (+14.0)#88 11.3% (+13.7)#4,289
89. Kempton 25.0% 11.1% (+13.9)#89 11.3% (+13.7)#4,321
90. Pine Village 25.0% 11.1% (+13.9)#90 11.3% (+13.7)#4,322
91. Nyona Lake 25.0% 11.1% (+13.9)#91 11.3% (+13.7)#4,330
92. Campbellsburg 24.6% 11.1% (+13.6)#92 11.3% (+13.3)#4,479
93. Crothersville 24.4% 11.1% (+13.3)#93 11.3% (+13.0)#4,554
94. Shamrock Lakes 24.3% 11.1% (+13.2)#94 11.3% (+12.9)#4,593
95. Miami 24.3% 11.1% (+13.2)#95 11.3% (+12.9)#4,595
96. Wawaka 24.2% 11.1% (+13.2)#96 11.3% (+12.9)#4,598
97. Arlington 24.2% 11.1% (+13.2)#97 11.3% (+12.9)#4,603
98. Little York 24.1% 11.1% (+13.0)#98 11.3% (+12.7)#4,670
99. Van Buren 24.0% 11.1% (+12.9)#99 11.3% (+12.6)#4,712
100. Loogootee 23.9% 11.1% (+12.9)#100 11.3% (+12.6)#4,729

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Male Poverty Level in Indiana?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Male Poverty Level in Indiana are:
#1
100.0%
#2
65.0%
#3
60.0%
#4
56.7%
#5
49.8%
#6
44.3%
#7
42.4%
#8
42.4%
#9
41.7%
#10
41.2%
What city has the Highest Male Poverty Level in Indiana?
Fredericksburg has the Highest Male Poverty Level in Indiana with 100.0%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Males in the State of Indiana?
Poverty Level Among Males in Indiana is 11.1%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Males in the United States?
Poverty Level Among Males in the United States is 11.3%.