Ute Female Disability

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,657,679 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Ute and percentage of females with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.144 and weighted average of 12.4%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ute within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.034% in percentage of females with a disability.

It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Ute and percentage of females with a disability does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Ute influences an upward or downward trend in the level of percentage of females with a disability within an area, or if Ute simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of percentage of females with a disability due to other factors.

Demographics Similar to Ute by Female Disability

In terms of female disability, the demographic groups most similar to Ute are Swiss (12.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (12.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Thailand (12.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Mexican (12.4%, a difference of 0.070%), and Panamanian (12.4%, a difference of 0.10%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Female Disability
Immigrants from Grenada	20.5 /100 \| #205	Fair 12.4%
Immigrants from Cuba	20.2 /100 \| #206	Fair 12.4%
Croatians	20.2 /100 \| #207	Fair 12.4%
Basques	17.5 /100 \| #208	Poor 12.4%
Mexicans	15.7 /100 \| #209	Poor 12.4%
Swiss	14.9 /100 \| #210	Poor 12.4%
Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina	14.8 /100 \| #211	Poor 12.4%
Ute	14.7 /100 \| #212	Poor 12.4%
Immigrants from Thailand	14.5 /100 \| #213	Poor 12.4%
Panamanians	13.5 /100 \| #214	Poor 12.4%
Samoans	13.4 /100 \| #215	Poor 12.4%
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar	13.3 /100 \| #216	Poor 12.4%
British	12.7 /100 \| #217	Poor 12.4%
Immigrants from Bahamas	12.5 /100 \| #218	Poor 12.4%
Europeans	12.1 /100 \| #219	Poor 12.4%

Ute Female Disability Correlation Summary

Measurement	Ute Data	Female Disability Data
Minimum	0.028%	7.1%
Maximum	100.0%	35.7%
Range	100.0%	28.7%
Mean	26.0%	15.9%
Median	11.0%	13.7%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	4.1%	11.3%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	44.1%	19.5%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	40.0%	8.2%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	30.5%	7.3%
Standard Deviation (Population)	30.0%	7.1%

Correlation Details

Ute Percentile	Sample Size	Female Disability
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.028%	55,238,532	12.0%
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.68%	249,344	14.9%
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.22%	56,635	14.2%
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.67%	10,159	25.0%
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.33%	50,998	13.7%
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.75%	8,458	13.6%
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.36%	387	7.1%
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.09%	2,004	14.2%
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.86%	8,830	11.4%
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.13%	1,151	25.6%
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.71%	14,894	12.3%
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.81%	470	19.5%
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.81%	1,754	10.4%
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.33%	1,285	13.8%
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.75%	577	12.3%
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.16%	484	7.1%
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.76%	5,495	10.0%
[ 13.5% - 14.0% ] 13.93%	244	29.6%
[ 16.0% - 16.5% ] 16.07%	616	17.0%
[ 25.5% - 26.0% ] 25.71%	140	17.2%
[ 26.5% - 27.0% ] 26.77%	310	24.6%
[ 42.0% - 42.5% ] 42.40%	283	11.7%
[ 44.0% - 44.5% ] 44.12%	136	19.8%
[ 52.0% - 52.5% ] 52.36%	191	9.0%
[ 56.5% - 57.0% ] 56.67%	60	35.7%
[ 67.5% - 68.0% ] 67.87%	831	11.3%
[ 71.0% - 71.5% ] 71.25%	1,186	11.3%
[ 78.0% - 78.5% ] 78.06%	1,691	8.0%
[ 96.0% - 96.5% ] 96.19%	472	14.0%
[ 99.5% - 100.0% ] 100.00%	62	29.6%

Ute Female Disability

COMPARE

Ute Female Disability Poor

Ute Female Disability Correlation Chart

Demographics Similar to Ute by Female Disability

Ute Female Disability Correlation Summary

Correlation Details

Ute Female Disability
Poor