Ute Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds
COMPARE
Ute
Select to Compare
Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds
Ute Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds
17.9%
POVERTY | FEMALES 25-34
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
318th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ute Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,501,714 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Ute and poverty level among females between the ages 25 and 34 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.735 and weighted average of 17.9%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ute within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.54% in poverty level among females between the ages 25 and 34.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Ute and poverty level among females between the ages 25 and 34 does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Ute influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among females between the ages 25 and 34 within an area, or if Ute simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among females between the ages 25 and 34 due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Ute by Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds
In terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds, the demographic groups most similar to Ute are Menominee (18.0%, a difference of 0.55%), Arapaho (17.8%, a difference of 0.60%), Chippewa (18.0%, a difference of 0.81%), Choctaw (18.1%, a difference of 1.0%), and Dominican (17.6%, a difference of 1.4%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds |
Immigrants from Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 17.3% |
Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 17.5% |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 17.5% |
Immigrants from Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 17.6% |
Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 17.6% |
Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 17.6% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 17.8% |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 17.9% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 18.0% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 18.0% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 18.1% |
Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 18.2% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 18.3% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 18.4% |
Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 18.5% |
Ute Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds Correlation Summary
Measurement | Ute Data | Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds Data |
Minimum | 0.028% | 6.5% |
Maximum | 96.2% | 70.6% |
Range | 96.2% | 64.1% |
Mean | 17.7% | 32.1% |
Median | 5.7% | 23.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.3% | 17.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 16.1% | 48.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 13.7% | 30.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 27.0% | 19.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 26.3% | 19.2% |
Correlation Details
Ute Percentile | Sample Size | Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.028% | 55,115,767 | 13.9% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.69% | 228,064 | 16.9% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.22% | 56,400 | 19.6% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.67% | 9,958 | 46.5% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.33% | 49,305 | 17.3% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.77% | 6,215 | 9.4% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.36% | 387 | 53.3% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.09% | 2,004 | 6.5% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.85% | 8,346 | 18.6% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.72% | 14,537 | 23.8% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.98% | 301 | 47.4% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.88% | 1,257 | 23.3% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.33% | 1,285 | 19.5% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.76% | 5,495 | 18.3% |
[ 16.0% - 16.5% ] 16.07% | 616 | 37.0% |
[ 42.0% - 42.5% ] 42.40% | 283 | 60.0% |
[ 52.0% - 52.5% ] 52.36% | 191 | 60.0% |
[ 67.5% - 68.0% ] 67.87% | 831 | 48.2% |
[ 96.0% - 96.5% ] 96.19% | 472 | 70.6% |