Ute Female Poverty
COMPARE
Ute
Select to Compare
Female Poverty
Ute Female Poverty
17.5%
POVERTY | FEMALES
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
318th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ute Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,666,863 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Ute and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.477 and weighted average of 17.5%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ute within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.22% in poverty level among females.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Ute and poverty level among females does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Ute influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among females within an area, or if Ute simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among females due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Ute by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Ute are Cajun (17.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Dominica (17.5%, a difference of 0.10%), Arapaho (17.5%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Congo (17.4%, a difference of 0.32%), and Honduran (17.4%, a difference of 0.52%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Immigrants from Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 17.0% |
| Immigrants from Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 17.0% |
| British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 17.0% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 17.1% |
| U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 17.3% |
| Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 17.4% |
| Immigrants from Congo | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 17.4% |
| Ute | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 17.5% |
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 17.5% |
| Immigrants from Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 17.5% |
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 17.5% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 17.6% |
| Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 17.7% |
| Immigrants from Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 17.7% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 17.8% |
Ute Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Ute Data | Female Poverty Data |
| Minimum | 0.028% | 4.6% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 73.0% |
| Range | 100.0% | 68.4% |
| Mean | 25.9% | 23.1% |
| Median | 8.3% | 17.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.4% | 15.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 44.1% | 25.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 40.8% | 10.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 31.4% | 14.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 30.8% | 14.5% |
Correlation Details
| Ute Percentile | Sample Size | Female Poverty |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.028% | 55,248,495 | 15.1% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.68% | 249,144 | 16.6% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.22% | 56,635 | 16.1% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.67% | 10,159 | 25.6% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.33% | 50,998 | 13.8% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.75% | 8,458 | 4.6% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.36% | 387 | 17.9% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.09% | 2,004 | 16.4% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.86% | 8,830 | 19.5% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.13% | 1,151 | 16.7% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.71% | 14,894 | 16.2% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.87% | 771 | 13.8% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.81% | 1,754 | 20.4% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.33% | 1,285 | 14.4% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.72% | 485 | 38.9% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.76% | 5,495 | 16.7% |
[ 16.0% - 16.5% ] 16.07% | 616 | 25.9% |
[ 25.5% - 26.0% ] 25.71% | 140 | 6.9% |
[ 26.5% - 27.0% ] 26.77% | 310 | 22.5% |
[ 42.0% - 42.5% ] 42.40% | 283 | 54.6% |
[ 44.0% - 44.5% ] 44.12% | 136 | 8.6% |
[ 52.0% - 52.5% ] 52.36% | 191 | 73.0% |
[ 67.5% - 68.0% ] 67.87% | 831 | 23.3% |
[ 71.0% - 71.5% ] 71.25% | 1,186 | 28.6% |
[ 78.0% - 78.5% ] 78.06% | 1,691 | 24.9% |
[ 96.0% - 96.5% ] 96.19% | 472 | 42.7% |
[ 99.5% - 100.0% ] 100.00% | 62 | 29.6% |