Ute Single Male Poverty
COMPARE
Ute
Select to Compare
Single Male Poverty
Ute Single Male Poverty
15.7%
POVERTY | SINGLE MALES
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
307th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ute Single Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 54,243,903 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Ute and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.584 and weighted average of 15.7%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ute within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.73% in poverty level among single males.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Ute and poverty level among single males does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Ute influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among single males within an area, or if Ute simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among single males due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Ute by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Ute are Potawatomi (15.8%, a difference of 0.57%), American (15.8%, a difference of 0.73%), Pennsylvania German (15.6%, a difference of 0.75%), Blackfeet (15.5%, a difference of 1.2%), and Yakama (15.9%, a difference of 1.6%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
Cree | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 15.1% |
Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 15.2% |
Alsatians | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 15.2% |
Aleuts | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 15.4% |
Alaska Natives | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 15.4% |
Blackfeet | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 15.5% |
Pennsylvania Germans | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 15.6% |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 15.7% |
Potawatomi | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 15.8% |
Americans | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 15.8% |
Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 15.9% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 16.0% |
Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 16.0% |
Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 16.1% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 16.1% |
Ute Single Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Ute Data | Single Male Poverty Data |
Minimum | 0.027% | 11.8% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 100.0% | 88.2% |
Mean | 12.7% | 45.2% |
Median | 4.1% | 37.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.8% | 19.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.8% | 62.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 10.0% | 42.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 25.2% | 31.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 24.3% | 30.4% |
Correlation Details
Ute Percentile | Sample Size | Single Male Poverty |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.027% | 53,942,704 | 11.8% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.69% | 186,683 | 19.9% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.26% | 32,676 | 26.1% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.80% | 3,665 | 62.8% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.36% | 43,333 | 13.9% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.74% | 2,486 | 39.3% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.36% | 387 | 100.0% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.06% | 1,674 | 40.5% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.85% | 8,346 | 37.4% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.71% | 14,181 | 33.3% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.33% | 1,285 | 28.6% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.76% | 5,495 | 15.0% |
[ 16.0% - 16.5% ] 16.07% | 616 | 50.0% |
[ 26.5% - 27.0% ] 26.77% | 310 | 100.0% |
[ 99.5% - 100.0% ] 100.00% | 62 | 100.0% |