Ute Births to Unmarried Women
COMPARE
Ute
Select to Compare
Births to Unmarried Women
Ute Births to Unmarried Women
33.0%
BIRTHS TO UNMARRIED WOMEN
14.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
203rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ute Births to Unmarried Women Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 54,718,542 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Ute and percentage of births to unmarried women in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.121 and weighted average of 33.0%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ute within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.59% in percentage of births to unmarried women.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Ute and percentage of births to unmarried women does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Ute influences an upward or downward trend in the level of percentage of births to unmarried women within an area, or if Ute simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of percentage of births to unmarried women due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Ute by Births to Unmarried Women
In terms of births to unmarried women, the demographic groups most similar to Ute are Immigrants from Africa (33.0%, a difference of 0.020%), German Russian (33.1%, a difference of 0.25%), Uruguayan (33.1%, a difference of 0.31%), Immigrants from Micronesia (32.9%, a difference of 0.38%), and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (32.9%, a difference of 0.39%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Births to Unmarried Women |
| Immigrants from Colombia | 21.7 /100 | #196 | Fair 32.6% |
| Immigrants | 20.6 /100 | #197 | Fair 32.7% |
| Costa Ricans | 20.3 /100 | #198 | Fair 32.7% |
| Immigrants from Thailand | 18.9 /100 | #199 | Poor 32.8% |
| Immigrants from Germany | 18.8 /100 | #200 | Poor 32.8% |
| Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar | 16.7 /100 | #201 | Poor 32.9% |
| Immigrants from Micronesia | 16.6 /100 | #202 | Poor 32.9% |
| Ute | 14.4 /100 | #203 | Poor 33.0% |
| Immigrants from Africa | 14.3 /100 | #204 | Poor 33.0% |
| German Russians | 13.1 /100 | #205 | Poor 33.1% |
| Uruguayans | 12.8 /100 | #206 | Poor 33.1% |
| Immigrants from Sudan | 11.5 /100 | #207 | Poor 33.2% |
| Hawaiians | 11.3 /100 | #208 | Poor 33.2% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 10.7 /100 | #209 | Poor 33.3% |
| Scotch-Irish | 10.7 /100 | #210 | Poor 33.3% |
Ute Births to Unmarried Women Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Ute Data | Births to Unmarried Women Data |
| Minimum | 0.027% | 12.5% |
| Maximum | 25.7% | 100.0% |
| Range | 25.7% | 87.5% |
| Mean | 6.5% | 57.2% |
| Median | 4.9% | 47.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.6% | 29.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.3% | 100.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.7% | 70.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.9% | 33.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.7% | 32.7% |
Correlation Details
| Ute Percentile | Sample Size | Births to Unmarried Women |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.027% | 54,419,631 | 31.1% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.68% | 179,427 | 34.7% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.20% | 41,356 | 47.5% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.59% | 3,023 | 86.8% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.35% | 43,712 | 29.4% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.63% | 380 | 100.0% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.36% | 387 | 100.0% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.90% | 6,884 | 28.8% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.08% | 768 | 100.0% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.71% | 14,181 | 32.6% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.88% | 1,257 | 84.6% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.33% | 1,285 | 12.5% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.76% | 5,495 | 53.7% |
[ 16.0% - 16.5% ] 16.07% | 616 | 16.7% |
[ 25.5% - 26.0% ] 25.71% | 140 | 100.0% |