Ute In Labor Force | Age 35-44
COMPARE
Ute
Select to Compare
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Ute In Labor Force | Age 35-44
79.4%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 35-44
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
332nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ute In Labor Force | Age 35-44 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,667,547 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Ute and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 35 and 44 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.036 and weighted average of 79.4%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ute within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.029% in labor force participation rate among population between the ages 35 and 44.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Ute and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 35 and 44 does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Ute influences an upward or downward trend in the level of labor force participation rate among population between the ages 35 and 44 within an area, or if Ute simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of labor force participation rate among population between the ages 35 and 44 due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Ute by In Labor Force | Age 35-44
In terms of in labor force | age 35-44, the demographic groups most similar to Ute are Houma (79.5%, a difference of 0.060%), Cheyenne (79.5%, a difference of 0.080%), Menominee (79.7%, a difference of 0.28%), Kiowa (79.2%, a difference of 0.33%), and Yakama (79.0%, a difference of 0.62%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 35-44 |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 80.4% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 80.4% |
| Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 80.2% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 80.0% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 79.7% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 79.5% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 79.5% |
| Ute | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 79.4% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 79.2% |
| Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 79.0% |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 78.9% |
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 78.1% |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 77.9% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 77.4% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 77.3% |
Ute In Labor Force | Age 35-44 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Ute Data | In Labor Force | Age 35-44 Data |
| Minimum | 0.028% | 5.9% |
| Maximum | 96.2% | 100.0% |
| Range | 96.2% | 94.1% |
| Mean | 22.9% | 69.3% |
| Median | 9.5% | 75.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.1% | 65.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 42.4% | 80.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 38.3% | 15.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 27.3% | 21.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 26.8% | 21.6% |
Correlation Details
| Ute Percentile | Sample Size | In Labor Force | Age 35-44 |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.028% | 55,248,495 | 83.5% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.68% | 249,344 | 78.1% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.22% | 56,635 | 78.5% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.67% | 10,159 | 68.7% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.33% | 50,998 | 77.9% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.75% | 8,458 | 81.0% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.36% | 387 | 5.9% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.09% | 2,004 | 80.5% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.86% | 8,830 | 79.6% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.08% | 768 | 80.9% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.72% | 14,537 | 71.0% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.22% | 498 | 31.8% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.87% | 771 | 92.5% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.81% | 1,754 | 71.8% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.33% | 1,285 | 73.7% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.72% | 485 | 67.1% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.16% | 484 | 79.3% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.76% | 5,495 | 78.7% |
[ 13.5% - 14.0% ] 13.93% | 244 | 47.8% |
[ 16.0% - 16.5% ] 16.07% | 616 | 66.0% |
[ 25.5% - 26.0% ] 25.71% | 140 | 50.0% |
[ 26.5% - 27.0% ] 26.77% | 310 | 50.0% |
[ 42.0% - 42.5% ] 42.40% | 283 | 100.0% |
[ 44.0% - 44.5% ] 44.12% | 136 | 25.0% |
[ 52.0% - 52.5% ] 52.36% | 191 | 100.0% |
[ 56.5% - 57.0% ] 56.67% | 60 | 100.0% |
[ 67.5% - 68.0% ] 67.87% | 831 | 42.9% |
[ 71.0% - 71.5% ] 71.25% | 1,186 | 65.5% |
[ 78.0% - 78.5% ] 78.06% | 1,691 | 72.5% |
[ 96.0% - 96.5% ] 96.19% | 472 | 78.6% |