Ute In Labor Force | Age 20-64
COMPARE
Ute
Select to Compare
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Ute In Labor Force | Age 20-64
73.7%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 20-64
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
335th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ute In Labor Force | Age 20-64 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,668,599 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Ute and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 20 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.526 and weighted average of 73.7%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ute within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.28% in labor force participation rate among population between the ages 20 and 64.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Ute and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 20 and 64 does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Ute influences an upward or downward trend in the level of labor force participation rate among population between the ages 20 and 64 within an area, or if Ute simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of labor force participation rate among population between the ages 20 and 64 due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Ute by In Labor Force | Age 20-64
In terms of in labor force | age 20-64, the demographic groups most similar to Ute are Apache (73.7%, a difference of 0.020%), Native/Alaskan (73.9%, a difference of 0.32%), Crow (73.3%, a difference of 0.51%), Yup'ik (73.2%, a difference of 0.63%), and Puerto Rican (73.1%, a difference of 0.83%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 20-64 |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 75.0% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 74.8% |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 74.8% |
Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 74.7% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 74.4% |
Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 73.9% |
Apache | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 73.7% |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 73.7% |
Crow | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 73.3% |
Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 73.2% |
Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 73.1% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 72.7% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 72.6% |
Immigrants from Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 72.3% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 71.7% |
Ute In Labor Force | Age 20-64 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Ute Data | In Labor Force | Age 20-64 Data |
Minimum | 0.028% | 25.5% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 100.0% | 74.5% |
Mean | 24.9% | 66.1% |
Median | 10.4% | 69.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.5% | 55.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 43.3% | 74.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 38.8% | 19.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 29.8% | 15.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 29.4% | 15.6% |
Correlation Details
Ute Percentile | Sample Size | In Labor Force | Age 20-64 |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.028% | 55,248,495 | 79.3% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.68% | 249,344 | 74.4% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.22% | 56,635 | 72.6% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.67% | 10,159 | 59.2% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.33% | 50,998 | 73.3% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.75% | 8,458 | 77.3% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.36% | 387 | 37.3% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.09% | 2,004 | 77.6% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.86% | 8,830 | 74.2% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.13% | 1,151 | 62.4% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.71% | 14,894 | 69.3% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.22% | 498 | 74.6% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.87% | 771 | 60.6% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.81% | 1,754 | 72.2% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.33% | 1,285 | 74.9% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.13% | 158 | 100.0% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.75% | 577 | 65.2% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.16% | 484 | 83.1% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.76% | 5,495 | 74.8% |
[ 13.5% - 14.0% ] 13.93% | 244 | 54.5% |
[ 16.0% - 16.5% ] 16.07% | 616 | 65.1% |
[ 25.5% - 26.0% ] 25.71% | 140 | 69.6% |
[ 26.5% - 27.0% ] 26.77% | 310 | 67.6% |
[ 42.0% - 42.5% ] 42.40% | 283 | 57.0% |
[ 44.0% - 44.5% ] 44.12% | 136 | 49.3% |
[ 52.0% - 52.5% ] 52.36% | 191 | 69.2% |
[ 56.5% - 57.0% ] 56.67% | 60 | 100.0% |
[ 67.5% - 68.0% ] 67.87% | 831 | 44.2% |
[ 71.0% - 71.5% ] 71.25% | 1,186 | 53.3% |
[ 78.0% - 78.5% ] 78.06% | 1,691 | 52.3% |
[ 96.0% - 96.5% ] 96.19% | 472 | 46.8% |
[ 99.5% - 100.0% ] 100.00% | 62 | 25.5% |