Ute Householder Income Over 65 years
COMPARE
Ute
Select to Compare
Householder Income Over 65 years
Ute Householder Income Over 65 years
$52,949
HOUSEHOLD INCOME | AGE > 65
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
304th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ute Householder Income Over 65 years Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,627,280 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Ute and household income with householder over the age of 65 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.355 and weighted average of $52,949. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ute within a typical geography, there is a decrease of $171 in household income with householder over the age of 65.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Ute and household income with householder over the age of 65 does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Ute influences an upward or downward trend in the level of household income with householder over the age of 65 within an area, or if Ute simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of household income with householder over the age of 65 due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Ute by Householder Income Over 65 years
In terms of householder income over 65 years, the demographic groups most similar to Ute are Pueblo ($52,930, a difference of 0.040%), Pennsylvania German ($52,888, a difference of 0.11%), Choctaw ($53,060, a difference of 0.21%), Hispanic or Latino ($52,832, a difference of 0.22%), and Spanish American Indian ($53,077, a difference of 0.24%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Householder Income Over 65 years |
Immigrants from Latin America | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic $53,265 |
Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic $53,232 |
Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic $53,217 |
Immigrants from Bahamas | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic $53,174 |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic $53,110 |
Spanish American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic $53,077 |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic $53,060 |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic $52,949 |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic $52,930 |
Pennsylvania Germans | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic $52,888 |
Hispanics or Latinos | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic $52,832 |
Immigrants from Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic $52,801 |
Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic $52,634 |
Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic $52,509 |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic $52,373 |
Ute Householder Income Over 65 years Correlation Summary
Measurement | Ute Data | Householder Income Over 65 years Data |
Minimum | 0.028% | $26,154 |
Maximum | 78.1% | $63,482 |
Range | 78.0% | $37,328 |
Mean | 16.8% | $40,597 |
Median | 6.5% | $39,530 |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.4% | $30,250 |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 16.1% | $48,922 |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 12.7% | $18,672 |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 23.1% | $11,138 |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 22.6% | $10,882 |
Correlation Details
Ute Percentile | Sample Size | Householder Income Over 65 years |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.028% | 55,228,451 | $57,377 |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.68% | 247,711 | $51,890 |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.22% | 53,924 | $49,924 |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.61% | 8,191 | $31,725 |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.33% | 49,443 | $48,922 |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.36% | 387 | $30,250 |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.09% | 2,004 | $36,131 |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.85% | 8,346 | $46,655 |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.13% | 1,151 | $29,992 |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.71% | 14,538 | $48,300 |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.22% | 498 | $53,750 |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.81% | 470 | $27,262 |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.88% | 1,257 | $63,482 |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.33% | 1,285 | $48,750 |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.72% | 485 | $29,038 |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.76% | 5,495 | $42,115 |
[ 16.0% - 16.5% ] 16.07% | 616 | $31,667 |
[ 26.5% - 27.0% ] 26.77% | 310 | $26,154 |
[ 44.0% - 44.5% ] 44.12% | 136 | $43,438 |
[ 56.5% - 57.0% ] 56.67% | 60 | $28,958 |
[ 67.5% - 68.0% ] 67.87% | 831 | $30,417 |
[ 78.0% - 78.5% ] 78.06% | 1,691 | $36,944 |