Ute Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65
COMPARE
Ute
Select to Compare
Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65
Ute Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65
12.2%
POVERTY | SENIORS > 65
0.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
249th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ute Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,563,330 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Ute and poverty level among seniors over the age of 65 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.467 and weighted average of 12.2%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ute within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.15% in poverty level among seniors over the age of 65.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Ute and poverty level among seniors over the age of 65 does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Ute influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among seniors over the age of 65 within an area, or if Ute simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among seniors over the age of 65 due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Ute by Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65
In terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65, the demographic groups most similar to Ute are Spanish American (12.2%, a difference of 0.050%), Japanese (12.2%, a difference of 0.060%), Cree (12.1%, a difference of 0.17%), Chippewa (12.1%, a difference of 0.28%), and Immigrants from Liberia (12.2%, a difference of 0.38%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.9 /100 | #242 | Tragic 12.1% |
| Uruguayans | 0.8 /100 | #243 | Tragic 12.1% |
| Immigrants from Portugal | 0.8 /100 | #244 | Tragic 12.1% |
| Chippewa | 0.7 /100 | #245 | Tragic 12.1% |
| Cree | 0.7 /100 | #246 | Tragic 12.1% |
| Japanese | 0.6 /100 | #247 | Tragic 12.2% |
| Spanish Americans | 0.6 /100 | #248 | Tragic 12.2% |
| Ute | 0.6 /100 | #249 | Tragic 12.2% |
| Immigrants from Liberia | 0.5 /100 | #250 | Tragic 12.2% |
| Somalis | 0.3 /100 | #251 | Tragic 12.3% |
| Armenians | 0.3 /100 | #252 | Tragic 12.3% |
| Shoshone | 0.3 /100 | #253 | Tragic 12.3% |
| Immigrants from Cambodia | 0.3 /100 | #254 | Tragic 12.4% |
| Mexican American Indians | 0.3 /100 | #255 | Tragic 12.4% |
| Immigrants from Panama | 0.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 12.4% |
Ute Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Ute Data | Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 Data |
| Minimum | 0.028% | 3.8% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 53.3% |
| Range | 100.0% | 49.5% |
| Mean | 23.9% | 15.4% |
| Median | 6.8% | 11.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.8% | 10.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 26.8% | 19.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 24.0% | 9.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 33.7% | 10.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 33.0% | 10.3% |
Correlation Details
| Ute Percentile | Sample Size | Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.028% | 55,154,831 | 12.3% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.68% | 245,814 | 10.4% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.22% | 53,924 | 10.9% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.67% | 10,159 | 19.2% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.33% | 50,899 | 10.2% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.77% | 7,871 | 3.8% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.36% | 387 | 20.0% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.09% | 2,004 | 11.7% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.86% | 8,830 | 12.2% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.22% | 383 | 30.4% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.71% | 14,538 | 8.0% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.88% | 1,257 | 8.1% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.33% | 1,285 | 7.3% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.72% | 485 | 25.2% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.76% | 5,495 | 13.0% |
[ 16.0% - 16.5% ] 16.07% | 616 | 11.8% |
[ 26.5% - 27.0% ] 26.77% | 310 | 11.8% |
[ 67.5% - 68.0% ] 67.87% | 831 | 8.3% |
[ 71.0% - 71.5% ] 71.25% | 1,186 | 18.2% |
[ 78.0% - 78.5% ] 78.06% | 1,691 | 11.3% |
[ 96.0% - 96.5% ] 96.19% | 472 | 20.7% |
[ 99.5% - 100.0% ] 100.00% | 62 | 53.3% |