Ute Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Ute
Select to Compare
Ambulatory Disability
Ute Ambulatory Disability
6.0%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
86.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
134th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ute Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,667,207 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Ute and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.127 and weighted average of 6.0%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ute within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.022% in percentage of population with ambulatory disability.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Ute and percentage of population with ambulatory disability does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Ute influences an upward or downward trend in the level of percentage of population with ambulatory disability within an area, or if Ute simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of percentage of population with ambulatory disability due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Ute by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Ute are Immigrants (6.0%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Europe (6.0%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Italy (6.0%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from North Macedonia (6.0%, a difference of 0.27%), and Immigrants from Syria (6.0%, a difference of 0.27%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Immigrants from Nigeria | 90.9 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants from Western Asia | 90.7 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants from Norway | 90.5 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants from Kazakhstan | 89.7 /100 | #130 | Excellent 5.9% |
| Immigrants from Costa Rica | 89.5 /100 | #131 | Excellent 5.9% |
| Immigrants from Europe | 87.8 /100 | #132 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | 86.9 /100 | #133 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Ute | 86.6 /100 | #134 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants from Italy | 85.0 /100 | #135 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants from North Macedonia | 84.1 /100 | #136 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants from Syria | 84.1 /100 | #137 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants from Hungary | 83.9 /100 | #138 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants from Zaire | 83.6 /100 | #139 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Czechs | 83.3 /100 | #140 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Swedes | 83.1 /100 | #141 | Excellent 6.0% |
Ute Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Ute Data | Ambulatory Disability Data |
| Minimum | 0.028% | 1.7% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 26.5% |
| Range | 100.0% | 24.8% |
| Mean | 24.0% | 7.6% |
| Median | 9.6% | 6.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.7% | 4.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 34.6% | 8.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 30.9% | 4.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 30.6% | 5.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 30.0% | 5.1% |
Correlation Details
| Ute Percentile | Sample Size | Ambulatory Disability |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.028% | 55,248,495 | 6.0% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.68% | 249,344 | 7.2% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.22% | 56,635 | 7.1% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.67% | 10,159 | 15.9% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.33% | 50,998 | 6.2% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.75% | 8,458 | 4.9% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.36% | 387 | 14.9% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.09% | 2,004 | 7.6% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.86% | 8,830 | 6.0% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.13% | 1,151 | 8.8% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.71% | 14,894 | 6.6% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.87% | 771 | 5.1% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.81% | 1,754 | 3.3% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.33% | 1,285 | 6.1% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.87% | 92 | 3.4% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.16% | 484 | 1.7% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.76% | 5,495 | 5.8% |
[ 13.5% - 14.0% ] 13.93% | 244 | 26.5% |
[ 16.0% - 16.5% ] 16.07% | 616 | 8.3% |
[ 25.5% - 26.0% ] 25.71% | 140 | 8.6% |
[ 26.5% - 27.0% ] 26.77% | 310 | 14.8% |
[ 42.0% - 42.5% ] 42.40% | 283 | 3.0% |
[ 44.0% - 44.5% ] 44.12% | 136 | 7.5% |
[ 67.5% - 68.0% ] 67.87% | 831 | 5.7% |
[ 71.0% - 71.5% ] 71.25% | 1,186 | 3.1% |
[ 78.0% - 78.5% ] 78.06% | 1,691 | 3.1% |
[ 96.0% - 96.5% ] 96.19% | 472 | 3.7% |
[ 99.5% - 100.0% ] 100.00% | 62 | 12.9% |