Ute vs Blackfeet Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Ute
Blackfeet
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Ute
Blackfeet
6.4%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
283rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.2%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
265th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ute vs Blackfeet Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,601,048 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Ute and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.251 and weighted average of 6.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 307,833,949 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Blackfeet and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.451 and weighted average of 6.2%, a difference of 4.4%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Ute | Blackfeet |
Minimum | 4.2% | 3.1% |
Maximum | 32.8% | 58.6% |
Range | 28.6% | 55.5% |
Mean | 11.0% | 16.2% |
Median | 8.3% | 12.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.0% | 9.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.1% | 21.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.1% | 12.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.0% | 11.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.8% | 11.1% |
Demographics Similar to Ute and Blackfeet by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Ute are Dutch West Indian (6.4%, a difference of 0.12%), Seminole (6.4%, a difference of 0.38%), Mexican American Indian (6.4%, a difference of 0.39%), West Indian (6.4%, a difference of 0.90%), and Houma (6.4%, a difference of 0.95%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Blackfeet are Creek (6.2%, a difference of 0.080%), Spanish American (6.2%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Congo (6.1%, a difference of 0.43%), Alaska Native (6.2%, a difference of 0.61%), and Immigrants from West Indies (6.2%, a difference of 0.78%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Immigrants | Congo | 0.2 /100 | #264 | Tragic 6.1% |
Blackfeet | 0.2 /100 | #265 | Tragic 6.2% |
Creek | 0.2 /100 | #266 | Tragic 6.2% |
Spanish Americans | 0.2 /100 | #267 | Tragic 6.2% |
Alaska Natives | 0.2 /100 | #268 | Tragic 6.2% |
Immigrants | West Indies | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 6.2% |
Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 6.2% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 6.2% |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.1 /100 | #272 | Tragic 6.2% |
Colville | 0.1 /100 | #273 | Tragic 6.3% |
Barbadians | 0.1 /100 | #274 | Tragic 6.3% |
Choctaw | 0.1 /100 | #275 | Tragic 6.3% |
Yaqui | 0.1 /100 | #276 | Tragic 6.3% |
Indonesians | 0.1 /100 | #277 | Tragic 6.3% |
Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.1 /100 | #278 | Tragic 6.4% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 6.4% |
West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 6.4% |
Mexican American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 6.4% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 6.4% |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 6.4% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 6.4% |