Pima vs Romanian Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Pima
Romanian
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Pima
Romanians
11.4%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
343rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.8%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
92.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
124th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Pima vs Romanian Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,466,640 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Pima and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.632 and weighted average of 11.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 374,441,854 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Romanians and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.447 and weighted average of 4.8%, a difference of 135.8%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Pima | Romanian |
| Minimum | 3.6% | 1.9% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 55.6% |
| Range | 96.4% | 53.6% |
| Mean | 19.6% | 13.3% |
| Median | 9.9% | 6.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.4% | 4.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 23.4% | 13.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 17.0% | 9.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 23.2% | 15.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 22.7% | 15.1% |
Similar Demographics by Married-Couple Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Pima by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Pima are Tohono O'odham (11.2%, a difference of 1.7%), Pueblo (11.1%, a difference of 2.6%), Navajo (11.9%, a difference of 3.9%), Puerto Rican (12.6%, a difference of 10.8%), and Immigrants from Yemen (12.8%, a difference of 12.2%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 8.3% |
| Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 8.4% |
| Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 8.7% |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 9.0% |
| Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 9.0% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 9.4% |
| Crow | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 9.6% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 9.7% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 11.1% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 11.2% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 11.4% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 11.9% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 12.6% |
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 12.8% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 13.4% |
Demographics Similar to Romanians by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Romanians are Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (4.8%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Asia (4.8%, a difference of 0.090%), Egyptian (4.8%, a difference of 0.23%), Jordanian (4.8%, a difference of 0.27%), and White/Caucasian (4.8%, a difference of 0.29%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
| Kenyans | 94.7 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Immigrants | Philippines | 94.6 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 94.0 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Immigrants | Southern Europe | 93.4 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Indians (Asian) | 93.2 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 93.1 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Jordanians | 93.1 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Romanians | 92.5 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 92.5 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Immigrants | Asia | 92.3 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Egyptians | 92.0 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Palestinians | 91.2 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Immigrants | Pakistan | 90.7 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Soviet Union | 90.7 /100 | #130 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 90.5 /100 | #131 | Exceptional 4.9% |