Pima Householder Income Over 65 years
COMPARE
Pima
Select to Compare
Householder Income Over 65 years
Pima Householder Income Over 65 years
$50,539
HOUSEHOLD INCOME | AGE > 65
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
331st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Pima Householder Income Over 65 years Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,493,441 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Pima and household income with householder over the age of 65 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.536 and weighted average of $50,539. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pima within a typical geography, there is a decrease of $307 in household income with householder over the age of 65.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Pima and household income with householder over the age of 65 does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Pima influences an upward or downward trend in the level of household income with householder over the age of 65 within an area, or if Pima simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of household income with householder over the age of 65 due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Pima by Householder Income Over 65 years
In terms of householder income over 65 years, the demographic groups most similar to Pima are Dutch West Indian ($50,475, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Grenada ($50,747, a difference of 0.41%), Black/African American ($50,779, a difference of 0.47%), Hopi ($50,925, a difference of 0.76%), and Bahamian ($51,000, a difference of 0.91%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Householder Income Over 65 years |
| Immigrants from Congo | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic $51,393 |
| Immigrants from Haiti | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic $51,219 |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic $51,140 |
| Bahamians | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic $51,000 |
| Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic $50,925 |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic $50,779 |
| Immigrants from Grenada | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic $50,747 |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic $50,539 |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic $50,475 |
| Cape Verdeans | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic $50,077 |
| Immigrants from Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic $50,071 |
| Crow | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic $49,234 |
| Cubans | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic $49,152 |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic $49,121 |
| Immigrants from Caribbean | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic $48,535 |
Pima Householder Income Over 65 years Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Pima Data | Householder Income Over 65 years Data |
| Minimum | 0.038% | $15,972 |
| Maximum | 90.9% | $94,583 |
| Range | 90.9% | $78,611 |
| Mean | 26.1% | $45,976 |
| Median | 5.3% | $46,564 |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.5% | $33,050 |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 62.1% | $53,656 |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 59.6% | $20,606 |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 34.6% | $19,860 |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 33.8% | $19,381 |
Correlation Details
| Pima Percentile | Sample Size | Householder Income Over 65 years |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.038% | 60,513,456 | $54,769 |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.71% | 529,889 | $49,233 |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.10% | 223,145 | $50,633 |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.66% | 66,702 | $62,862 |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.22% | 52,609 | $62,741 |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.76% | 5,078 | $46,564 |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.20% | 7,278 | $37,980 |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.77% | 3,426 | $41,630 |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.09% | 4,059 | $34,340 |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.99% | 51,156 | $85,793 |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.35% | 505 | $31,667 |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.94% | 1,178 | $38,125 |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.01% | 1,370 | $94,583 |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.29% | 17,659 | $52,543 |
[ 30.0% - 30.5% ] 30.03% | 383 | $51,442 |
[ 48.0% - 48.5% ] 48.39% | 965 | $17,500 |
[ 75.5% - 76.0% ] 75.80% | 1,835 | $33,023 |
[ 79.0% - 79.5% ] 79.26% | 4,538 | $50,375 |
[ 83.0% - 83.5% ] 83.14% | 4,139 | $33,077 |
[ 86.5% - 87.0% ] 86.98% | 3,265 | $20,646 |
[ 90.5% - 91.0% ] 90.94% | 806 | $15,972 |