Pima Male Poverty
COMPARE
Pima
Select to Compare
Male Poverty
Pima Male Poverty
20.4%
POVERTY | MALES
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
342nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Pima Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,538,248 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Pima and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.538 and weighted average of 20.4%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pima within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.30% in poverty level among males.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Pima and poverty level among males does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Pima influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among males within an area, or if Pima simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among males due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Pima by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Pima are Yup'ik (20.4%, a difference of 0.10%), Lumbee (20.2%, a difference of 0.78%), Immigrants from Yemen (20.1%, a difference of 1.1%), Hopi (20.8%, a difference of 2.2%), and Yuman (19.5%, a difference of 4.2%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 17.6% |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 17.7% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 18.5% |
| Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 18.7% |
| Crow | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 19.1% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 19.5% |
| Immigrants from Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 20.1% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 20.2% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 20.4% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 20.4% |
| Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 20.8% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 22.0% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 22.3% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 22.9% |
Pima Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Pima Data | Male Poverty Data |
| Minimum | 0.038% | 9.2% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 100.0% | 90.8% |
| Mean | 38.2% | 29.7% |
| Median | 11.3% | 23.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.8% | 14.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 79.0% | 37.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 75.2% | 22.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 38.0% | 21.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 37.4% | 20.7% |
Correlation Details
| Pima Percentile | Sample Size | Male Poverty |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.038% | 60,537,692 | 13.5% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.71% | 540,838 | 16.0% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.10% | 224,372 | 17.1% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.66% | 66,702 | 9.2% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.23% | 53,054 | 12.8% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.76% | 5,078 | 12.9% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.19% | 5,800 | 37.4% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.77% | 3,426 | 11.2% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.15% | 5,836 | 23.5% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.99% | 51,156 | 10.7% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.32% | 1,371 | 20.9% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.92% | 2,027 | 20.8% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.01% | 1,370 | 14.8% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.57% | 115 | 41.0% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.78% | 102 | 35.4% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.29% | 17,659 | 19.9% |
[ 12.5% - 13.0% ] 12.92% | 387 | 12.9% |
[ 48.0% - 48.5% ] 48.39% | 965 | 52.9% |
[ 65.5% - 66.0% ] 65.79% | 114 | 100.0% |
[ 68.5% - 69.0% ] 68.98% | 332 | 29.9% |
[ 71.0% - 71.5% ] 71.13% | 478 | 18.7% |
[ 75.5% - 76.0% ] 75.80% | 1,835 | 30.3% |
[ 76.5% - 77.0% ] 76.81% | 470 | 14.5% |
[ 78.5% - 79.0% ] 78.99% | 2,713 | 23.0% |
[ 79.0% - 79.5% ] 79.26% | 4,538 | 24.8% |
[ 83.0% - 83.5% ] 83.14% | 4,139 | 35.7% |
[ 84.5% - 85.0% ] 84.86% | 733 | 45.3% |
[ 85.5% - 86.0% ] 85.85% | 615 | 81.9% |
[ 86.5% - 87.0% ] 86.98% | 3,265 | 38.1% |
[ 90.5% - 91.0% ] 90.94% | 806 | 36.9% |
[ 99.5% - 100.0% ] 100.00% | 260 | 59.4% |