Pima Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds
COMPARE
Pima
Select to Compare
Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds
Pima Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds
25.3%
POVERTY | FEMALES 25-34
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
345th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Pima Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,428,748 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Pima and poverty level among females between the ages 25 and 34 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.488 and weighted average of 25.3%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pima within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.36% in poverty level among females between the ages 25 and 34.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Pima and poverty level among females between the ages 25 and 34 does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Pima influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among females between the ages 25 and 34 within an area, or if Pima simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among females between the ages 25 and 34 due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Pima by Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds
In terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds, the demographic groups most similar to Pima are Tohono O'odham (24.7%, a difference of 2.2%), Lumbee (26.3%, a difference of 3.9%), Puerto Rican (26.3%, a difference of 3.9%), Yup'ik (24.3%, a difference of 4.1%), and Hopi (23.7%, a difference of 6.8%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds |
Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 19.9% |
Apache | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 20.1% |
Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 20.3% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 22.2% |
Crow | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 22.7% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 22.7% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 22.9% |
Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 23.0% |
Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 23.3% |
Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 23.7% |
Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 24.3% |
Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 24.7% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 25.3% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 26.3% |
Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 26.3% |
Pima Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds Correlation Summary
Measurement | Pima Data | Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds Data |
Minimum | 0.038% | 5.6% |
Maximum | 90.9% | 100.0% |
Range | 90.9% | 94.4% |
Mean | 30.4% | 39.8% |
Median | 7.0% | 35.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.0% | 19.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 74.8% | 50.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 71.8% | 31.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 35.7% | 26.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 35.0% | 26.0% |
Correlation Details
Pima Percentile | Sample Size | Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.038% | 60,456,450 | 15.0% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.71% | 521,029 | 17.9% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.10% | 220,748 | 20.8% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.66% | 66,702 | 10.7% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.22% | 52,609 | 16.4% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.76% | 5,078 | 29.3% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.19% | 5,800 | 36.0% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.77% | 3,426 | 37.9% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.15% | 5,836 | 32.0% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.99% | 51,096 | 15.3% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.35% | 505 | 62.5% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.94% | 1,178 | 26.8% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.01% | 1,370 | 5.6% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.57% | 115 | 100.0% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.29% | 17,659 | 31.7% |
[ 12.5% - 13.0% ] 12.92% | 387 | 38.1% |
[ 48.0% - 48.5% ] 48.39% | 965 | 35.4% |
[ 65.5% - 66.0% ] 65.79% | 114 | 100.0% |
[ 73.5% - 74.0% ] 73.77% | 385 | 40.7% |
[ 75.5% - 76.0% ] 75.80% | 1,835 | 53.5% |
[ 78.5% - 79.0% ] 78.99% | 2,713 | 49.7% |
[ 79.0% - 79.5% ] 79.26% | 4,538 | 31.9% |
[ 83.0% - 83.5% ] 83.14% | 4,139 | 51.7% |
[ 86.5% - 87.0% ] 86.98% | 3,265 | 37.0% |
[ 90.5% - 91.0% ] 90.94% | 806 | 100.0% |