Pima Single Male Poverty
COMPARE
Pima
Select to Compare
Single Male Poverty
Pima Single Male Poverty
20.2%
POVERTY | SINGLE MALES
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
334th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Pima Single Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 60,152,261 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Pima and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.402 and weighted average of 20.2%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pima within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.29% in poverty level among single males.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Pima and poverty level among single males does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Pima influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among single males within an area, or if Pima simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among single males due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Pima by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Pima are Inupiat (20.0%, a difference of 0.80%), Native/Alaskan (19.6%, a difference of 2.7%), Paiute (19.3%, a difference of 4.4%), Cajun (19.1%, a difference of 5.7%), and Yuman (21.3%, a difference of 5.7%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 17.7% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 18.3% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 18.4% |
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 19.1% |
| Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 19.3% |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 19.6% |
| Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 20.0% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 20.2% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 21.3% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 21.6% |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 21.6% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 21.6% |
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 21.9% |
| Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 22.2% |
| Crow | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 23.3% |
Pima Single Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Pima Data | Single Male Poverty Data |
| Minimum | 0.037% | 6.5% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 100.0% | 93.5% |
| Mean | 35.0% | 37.5% |
| Median | 8.3% | 28.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.6% | 20.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 79.0% | 40.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 76.4% | 20.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 38.8% | 28.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 37.9% | 27.5% |
Correlation Details
| Pima Percentile | Sample Size | Single Male Poverty |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.037% | 59,329,831 | 12.7% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.71% | 439,857 | 16.4% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.10% | 217,136 | 17.0% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.86% | 24,834 | 25.0% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.27% | 41,680 | 20.7% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.61% | 957 | 24.0% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.23% | 4,335 | 40.7% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.15% | 5,594 | 24.2% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.99% | 51,096 | 6.5% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.94% | 1,178 | 35.6% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.01% | 1,370 | 40.6% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.57% | 115 | 100.0% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.29% | 17,659 | 14.1% |
[ 48.0% - 48.5% ] 48.39% | 965 | 59.0% |
[ 75.5% - 76.0% ] 75.80% | 1,835 | 20.7% |
[ 76.5% - 77.0% ] 76.81% | 470 | 100.0% |
[ 78.5% - 79.0% ] 78.99% | 2,713 | 20.0% |
[ 79.0% - 79.5% ] 79.26% | 4,538 | 36.2% |
[ 83.0% - 83.5% ] 83.14% | 4,139 | 45.2% |
[ 84.5% - 85.0% ] 84.86% | 733 | 34.5% |
[ 86.5% - 87.0% ] 86.98% | 1,137 | 32.2% |
[ 99.5% - 100.0% ] 100.00% | 89 | 100.0% |