Pima Family Poverty
COMPARE
Pima
Select to Compare
Family Poverty
Pima Family Poverty
18.4%
POVERTY | FAMILIES
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
343rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Pima Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,531,194 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Pima and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.592 and weighted average of 18.4%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pima within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.36% in poverty level among families.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Pima and poverty level among families does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Pima influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among families within an area, or if Pima simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among families due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Pima by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Pima are Yup'ik (18.7%, a difference of 1.8%), Navajo (18.8%, a difference of 2.4%), Immigrants from Yemen (17.5%, a difference of 5.1%), Lumbee (17.0%, a difference of 8.0%), and Pueblo (17.0%, a difference of 8.1%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
| Immigrants from Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 14.6% |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 14.7% |
| Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Crow | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 16.6% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 17.0% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 17.0% |
| Immigrants from Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 17.5% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 18.4% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 18.7% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 18.8% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 20.3% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 20.4% |
Pima Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Pima Data | Family Poverty Data |
| Minimum | 0.038% | 7.2% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 100.0% | 92.8% |
| Mean | 39.1% | 29.5% |
| Median | 12.1% | 23.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.8% | 13.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 79.0% | 34.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 75.2% | 21.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 38.3% | 23.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 37.7% | 22.7% |
Correlation Details
| Pima Percentile | Sample Size | Family Poverty |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.038% | 60,534,742 | 11.1% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.71% | 537,759 | 13.0% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.10% | 224,125 | 14.0% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.66% | 66,702 | 7.8% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.22% | 52,609 | 10.2% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.76% | 5,078 | 12.6% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.19% | 5,800 | 30.8% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.77% | 3,426 | 10.6% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.15% | 5,836 | 24.4% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.99% | 51,096 | 7.2% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.32% | 1,371 | 21.3% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.92% | 2,027 | 20.4% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.01% | 1,370 | 13.0% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.57% | 115 | 48.1% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.29% | 17,659 | 20.6% |
[ 12.5% - 13.0% ] 12.92% | 387 | 20.9% |
[ 48.0% - 48.5% ] 48.39% | 965 | 28.2% |
[ 65.5% - 66.0% ] 65.79% | 114 | 100.0% |
[ 68.5% - 69.0% ] 68.98% | 332 | 19.0% |
[ 71.0% - 71.5% ] 71.13% | 478 | 35.8% |
[ 75.5% - 76.0% ] 75.80% | 1,835 | 34.4% |
[ 76.5% - 77.0% ] 76.81% | 470 | 31.9% |
[ 78.5% - 79.0% ] 78.99% | 2,713 | 26.3% |
[ 79.0% - 79.5% ] 79.26% | 4,538 | 23.2% |
[ 83.0% - 83.5% ] 83.14% | 4,139 | 25.5% |
[ 84.5% - 85.0% ] 84.86% | 733 | 23.3% |
[ 85.5% - 86.0% ] 85.85% | 615 | 57.6% |
[ 86.5% - 87.0% ] 86.98% | 3,265 | 50.3% |
[ 90.5% - 91.0% ] 90.94% | 806 | 43.3% |
[ 99.5% - 100.0% ] 100.00% | 89 | 100.0% |