Pima Unemployment Among Ages 35 to 44 years
COMPARE
Pima
Select to Compare
Unemployment Among Ages 35 to 44 years
Pima Unemployment Among Ages 35 to 44 years
11.8%
UNEMPLOYMENT | 35 TO 44 YEARS
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
344th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Pima Unemployment Among Ages 35 to 44 years Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,252,012 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Pima and unemployment rate among population between the ages 35 and 44 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.545 and weighted average of 11.8%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pima within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.44% in unemployment rate among population between the ages 35 and 44.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Pima and unemployment rate among population between the ages 35 and 44 does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Pima influences an upward or downward trend in the level of unemployment rate among population between the ages 35 and 44 within an area, or if Pima simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of unemployment rate among population between the ages 35 and 44 due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Pima by Unemployment Among Ages 35 to 44 years
In terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years, the demographic groups most similar to Pima are Arapaho (10.3%, a difference of 14.3%), Yup'ik (14.4%, a difference of 22.8%), Navajo (9.3%, a difference of 25.9%), Hopi (8.9%, a difference of 32.4%), and Crow (15.7%, a difference of 33.6%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Unemployment Among Ages 35 to 44 years |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 7.6% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 7.8% |
| Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 8.4% |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 8.4% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 8.4% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 8.5% |
| Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 8.6% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 8.6% |
| Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 8.9% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 9.3% |
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 10.3% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 11.8% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Crow | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 15.7% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 16.9% |
Pima Unemployment Among Ages 35 to 44 years Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Pima Data | Unemployment Among Ages 35 to 44 years Data |
| Minimum | 0.038% | 2.7% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 100.0% | 97.3% |
| Mean | 30.2% | 27.1% |
| Median | 5.9% | 11.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.5% | 5.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 77.5% | 46.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 75.0% | 40.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 38.3% | 30.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 37.3% | 30.0% |
Correlation Details
| Pima Percentile | Sample Size | Unemployment Among Ages 35 to 44 years |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.038% | 60,318,984 | 5.2% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.71% | 512,498 | 6.8% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.09% | 218,984 | 7.0% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.56% | 46,923 | 6.8% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.23% | 51,654 | 5.0% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.79% | 4,121 | 3.4% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.20% | 7,278 | 19.9% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.77% | 3,426 | 26.6% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.09% | 4,059 | 8.2% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.99% | 51,096 | 2.7% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.94% | 1,178 | 3.2% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.01% | 1,370 | 5.9% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.57% | 115 | 100.0% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.29% | 17,659 | 11.8% |
[ 65.5% - 66.0% ] 65.79% | 114 | 100.0% |
[ 75.5% - 76.0% ] 75.80% | 1,835 | 60.5% |
[ 79.0% - 79.5% ] 79.26% | 4,538 | 19.4% |
[ 83.0% - 83.5% ] 83.14% | 4,139 | 22.3% |
[ 84.5% - 85.0% ] 84.86% | 733 | 39.1% |
[ 86.5% - 87.0% ] 86.98% | 1,137 | 61.4% |
[ 99.5% - 100.0% ] 100.00% | 171 | 53.5% |