Pima Disability Age 35 to 64
COMPARE
Pima
Select to Compare
Disability Age 35 to 64
Pima Disability Age 35 to 64
16.1%
DISABILITY | AGE 35 TO 64
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
339th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Pima Disability Age 35 to 64 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,540,994 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Pima and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.594 and weighted average of 16.1%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pima within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.13% in percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Pima and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Pima influences an upward or downward trend in the level of percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 within an area, or if Pima simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Pima by Disability Age 35 to 64
In terms of disability age 35 to 64, the demographic groups most similar to Pima are Chickasaw (16.1%, a difference of 0.20%), Puerto Rican (15.9%, a difference of 1.2%), Menominee (15.9%, a difference of 1.6%), Choctaw (16.4%, a difference of 1.7%), and Seminole (15.9%, a difference of 1.8%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability Age 35 to 64 |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 15.7% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 16.4% |
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 16.7% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 16.7% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 17.4% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 17.6% |
Pima Disability Age 35 to 64 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Pima Data | Disability Age 35 to 64 Data |
| Minimum | 0.038% | 8.6% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 44.5% |
| Range | 100.0% | 35.9% |
| Mean | 37.1% | 19.9% |
| Median | 12.3% | 18.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.8% | 13.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 79.0% | 25.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 75.2% | 11.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 37.7% | 8.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 37.0% | 8.2% |
Correlation Details
| Pima Percentile | Sample Size | Disability Age 35 to 64 |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.038% | 60,538,176 | 11.9% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.71% | 540,838 | 16.2% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.10% | 224,372 | 16.5% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.66% | 66,702 | 14.6% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.23% | 53,054 | 13.8% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.76% | 5,078 | 13.4% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.20% | 7,278 | 11.6% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.77% | 3,426 | 10.6% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.15% | 5,836 | 25.8% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.99% | 51,156 | 11.3% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.35% | 505 | 25.4% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.92% | 2,027 | 15.7% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.01% | 1,370 | 8.6% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.78% | 102 | 16.7% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.29% | 17,830 | 14.3% |
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.28% | 1,270 | 23.7% |
[ 12.5% - 13.0% ] 12.92% | 387 | 25.1% |
[ 30.0% - 30.5% ] 30.03% | 383 | 25.5% |
[ 48.0% - 48.5% ] 48.39% | 965 | 8.7% |
[ 68.5% - 69.0% ] 68.98% | 332 | 21.6% |
[ 71.0% - 71.5% ] 71.13% | 478 | 19.9% |
[ 75.5% - 76.0% ] 75.80% | 1,835 | 22.5% |
[ 76.5% - 77.0% ] 76.81% | 470 | 16.8% |
[ 78.5% - 79.0% ] 78.99% | 2,713 | 21.9% |
[ 79.0% - 79.5% ] 79.26% | 4,538 | 22.6% |
[ 83.0% - 83.5% ] 83.14% | 4,139 | 18.9% |
[ 84.5% - 85.0% ] 84.86% | 733 | 34.0% |
[ 85.5% - 86.0% ] 85.85% | 615 | 38.8% |
[ 86.5% - 87.0% ] 86.98% | 3,265 | 25.7% |
[ 90.5% - 91.0% ] 90.94% | 806 | 20.2% |
[ 99.5% - 100.0% ] 100.00% | 315 | 44.5% |