Pima Disability Age Over 75
COMPARE
Pima
Select to Compare
Disability Age Over 75
Pima Disability Age Over 75
55.8%
DISABILITY | AGE OVER 75
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
339th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Pima Disability Age Over 75 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,521,076 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Pima and percentage of population with a disability over the age of 75 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.355 and weighted average of 55.8%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pima within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.22% in percentage of population with a disability over the age of 75.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Pima and percentage of population with a disability over the age of 75 does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Pima influences an upward or downward trend in the level of percentage of population with a disability over the age of 75 within an area, or if Pima simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of percentage of population with a disability over the age of 75 due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Pima by Disability Age Over 75
In terms of disability age over 75, the demographic groups most similar to Pima are Pueblo (55.9%, a difference of 0.080%), Houma (56.2%, a difference of 0.59%), Lumbee (56.2%, a difference of 0.76%), Colville (55.4%, a difference of 0.82%), and Tohono O'odham (56.7%, a difference of 1.6%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability Age Over 75 |
Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 53.1% |
Apache | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 53.6% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 54.0% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 54.2% |
Immigrants from Armenia | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 54.3% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 54.4% |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 55.4% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 55.8% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 55.9% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 56.2% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 56.2% |
Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 56.7% |
Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 58.3% |
Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 58.4% |
Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 59.2% |
Pima Disability Age Over 75 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Pima Data | Disability Age Over 75 Data |
Minimum | 0.038% | 12.9% |
Maximum | 90.9% | 100.0% |
Range | 90.9% | 87.1% |
Mean | 33.7% | 61.7% |
Median | 11.3% | 57.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.2% | 48.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 76.8% | 80.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 73.6% | 31.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 36.9% | 22.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 36.2% | 22.1% |
Correlation Details
Pima Percentile | Sample Size | Disability Age Over 75 |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.038% | 60,524,917 | 49.2% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.71% | 537,759 | 52.6% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.10% | 224,372 | 47.5% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.66% | 66,702 | 45.9% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.23% | 53,054 | 50.4% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.76% | 5,078 | 29.3% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.23% | 5,813 | 47.8% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.77% | 3,426 | 52.2% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.15% | 5,836 | 82.5% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.99% | 51,156 | 44.1% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.35% | 505 | 57.1% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.92% | 2,027 | 61.0% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.01% | 1,370 | 50.0% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.29% | 17,659 | 65.2% |
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.28% | 1,270 | 96.9% |
[ 12.5% - 13.0% ] 12.92% | 387 | 50.0% |
[ 30.0% - 30.5% ] 30.03% | 383 | 58.2% |
[ 71.0% - 71.5% ] 71.13% | 478 | 100.0% |
[ 73.5% - 74.0% ] 73.77% | 385 | 100.0% |
[ 75.5% - 76.0% ] 75.80% | 1,835 | 100.0% |
[ 76.5% - 77.0% ] 76.81% | 470 | 48.9% |
[ 78.5% - 79.0% ] 78.99% | 2,713 | 60.3% |
[ 79.0% - 79.5% ] 79.26% | 4,538 | 63.0% |
[ 83.0% - 83.5% ] 83.14% | 4,139 | 61.4% |
[ 84.5% - 85.0% ] 84.86% | 733 | 100.0% |
[ 86.5% - 87.0% ] 86.98% | 3,265 | 80.3% |
[ 90.5% - 91.0% ] 90.94% | 806 | 12.9% |