Pima In Labor Force | Age 20-64
COMPARE
Pima
Select to Compare
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Pima In Labor Force | Age 20-64
69.0%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 20-64
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
347th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Pima In Labor Force | Age 20-64 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,542,645 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Pima and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 20 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.539 and weighted average of 69.0%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pima within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.20% in labor force participation rate among population between the ages 20 and 64.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Pima and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 20 and 64 does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Pima influences an upward or downward trend in the level of labor force participation rate among population between the ages 20 and 64 within an area, or if Pima simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of labor force participation rate among population between the ages 20 and 64 due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Pima by In Labor Force | Age 20-64
In terms of in labor force | age 20-64, the demographic groups most similar to Pima are Navajo (69.2%, a difference of 0.16%), Tohono O'odham (70.4%, a difference of 2.0%), Lumbee (70.6%, a difference of 2.3%), Hopi (71.7%, a difference of 3.9%), and Yuman (71.7%, a difference of 3.9%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 20-64 |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 73.9% |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 73.7% |
| Ute | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 73.7% |
| Crow | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 73.3% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 73.2% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 73.1% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 72.7% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 72.6% |
| Immigrants from Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 72.3% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 71.7% |
| Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 71.7% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 70.6% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 70.4% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 69.2% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 69.0% |
Pima In Labor Force | Age 20-64 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Pima Data | In Labor Force | Age 20-64 Data |
| Minimum | 0.038% | 26.3% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 88.1% |
| Range | 100.0% | 61.8% |
| Mean | 38.2% | 64.1% |
| Median | 12.6% | 65.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.1% | 57.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 76.8% | 75.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 72.7% | 18.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 37.1% | 13.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 36.6% | 13.2% |
Correlation Details
| Pima Percentile | Sample Size | In Labor Force | Age 20-64 |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.038% | 60,538,176 | 78.4% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.71% | 540,838 | 70.9% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.10% | 224,372 | 76.8% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.66% | 66,702 | 75.9% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.23% | 53,054 | 78.0% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.76% | 5,078 | 65.4% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.20% | 7,278 | 63.2% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.77% | 3,426 | 72.2% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.15% | 5,836 | 57.1% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.99% | 51,156 | 79.9% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.32% | 1,371 | 80.6% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.92% | 2,027 | 69.3% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.01% | 1,370 | 66.2% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.57% | 115 | 77.1% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.78% | 102 | 48.8% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.29% | 17,830 | 70.9% |
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.28% | 1,270 | 61.7% |
[ 12.5% - 13.0% ] 12.92% | 387 | 75.9% |
[ 30.0% - 30.5% ] 30.03% | 383 | 62.4% |
[ 48.0% - 48.5% ] 48.39% | 965 | 58.5% |
[ 65.5% - 66.0% ] 65.79% | 114 | 51.5% |
[ 68.5% - 69.0% ] 68.98% | 332 | 60.9% |
[ 71.0% - 71.5% ] 71.13% | 478 | 54.7% |
[ 73.5% - 74.0% ] 73.77% | 385 | 88.1% |
[ 75.5% - 76.0% ] 75.80% | 1,835 | 65.3% |
[ 76.5% - 77.0% ] 76.81% | 470 | 72.0% |
[ 78.5% - 79.0% ] 78.99% | 2,713 | 34.8% |
[ 79.0% - 79.5% ] 79.26% | 4,538 | 49.5% |
[ 83.0% - 83.5% ] 83.14% | 4,139 | 58.3% |
[ 84.5% - 85.0% ] 84.86% | 733 | 71.8% |
[ 85.5% - 86.0% ] 85.85% | 615 | 26.3% |
[ 86.5% - 87.0% ] 86.98% | 3,265 | 49.1% |
[ 90.5% - 91.0% ] 90.94% | 806 | 57.9% |
[ 99.5% - 100.0% ] 100.00% | 486 | 51.2% |