Pima 2 or more Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Pima
Select to Compare
2 or more Vehicles in Household
Pima 2 or more Vehicles in Household
52.0%
2+ VEHICLES AVAILABLE
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
268th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Pima 2 or more Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,539,452 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Pima and percentage of households with 2 or more vehicles available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.281 and weighted average of 52.0%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pima within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.11% in percentage of households with 2 or more vehicles available.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Pima and percentage of households with 2 or more vehicles available does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Pima influences an upward or downward trend in the level of percentage of households with 2 or more vehicles available within an area, or if Pima simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of percentage of households with 2 or more vehicles available due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Pima by 2 or more Vehicles in Household
In terms of 2 or more vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Pima are Immigrants from Colombia (52.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Honduran (52.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Ireland (52.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from France (52.0%, a difference of 0.060%), and Immigrants from Congo (52.1%, a difference of 0.20%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | 2 or more Vehicles in Household |
| Immigrants from Australia | 0.5 /100 | #261 | Tragic 52.4% |
| Immigrants from Northern Africa | 0.4 /100 | #262 | Tragic 52.3% |
| Immigrants from Southern Europe | 0.4 /100 | #263 | Tragic 52.3% |
| Immigrants from Latvia | 0.4 /100 | #264 | Tragic 52.2% |
| Immigrants from Congo | 0.3 /100 | #265 | Tragic 52.1% |
| Immigrants from France | 0.2 /100 | #266 | Tragic 52.0% |
| Immigrants from Colombia | 0.2 /100 | #267 | Tragic 52.0% |
| Pima | 0.2 /100 | #268 | Tragic 52.0% |
| Hondurans | 0.2 /100 | #269 | Tragic 52.0% |
| Immigrants from Ireland | 0.2 /100 | #270 | Tragic 52.0% |
| South Americans | 0.2 /100 | #271 | Tragic 51.9% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.2 /100 | #272 | Tragic 51.9% |
| Israelis | 0.2 /100 | #273 | Tragic 51.9% |
| Africans | 0.2 /100 | #274 | Tragic 51.8% |
| Immigrants from Honduras | 0.2 /100 | #275 | Tragic 51.8% |
Pima 2 or more Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Pima Data | 2 or more Vehicles in Household Data |
| Minimum | 0.038% | 19.4% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 79.2% |
| Range | 100.0% | 59.9% |
| Mean | 37.4% | 52.9% |
| Median | 12.3% | 50.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.0% | 43.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 77.9% | 64.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 73.9% | 21.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 37.4% | 14.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 36.8% | 14.3% |
Correlation Details
| Pima Percentile | Sample Size | 2 or more Vehicles in Household |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.038% | 60,538,176 | 49.3% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.71% | 537,759 | 57.4% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.10% | 224,372 | 56.0% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.66% | 66,702 | 70.8% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.23% | 53,054 | 59.1% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.76% | 5,078 | 64.7% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.20% | 7,278 | 50.4% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.77% | 3,426 | 64.2% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.15% | 5,836 | 41.9% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.99% | 51,156 | 78.1% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.32% | 1,371 | 74.1% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.92% | 2,027 | 71.6% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.01% | 1,370 | 63.9% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.57% | 115 | 25.9% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.78% | 102 | 31.7% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.29% | 17,830 | 64.0% |
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.28% | 1,270 | 48.3% |
[ 12.5% - 13.0% ] 12.92% | 387 | 46.8% |
[ 30.0% - 30.5% ] 30.03% | 383 | 50.7% |
[ 48.0% - 48.5% ] 48.39% | 965 | 56.2% |
[ 68.5% - 69.0% ] 68.98% | 332 | 42.4% |
[ 71.0% - 71.5% ] 71.13% | 478 | 35.5% |
[ 73.5% - 74.0% ] 73.77% | 385 | 47.6% |
[ 75.5% - 76.0% ] 75.80% | 1,835 | 49.3% |
[ 76.5% - 77.0% ] 76.81% | 470 | 73.2% |
[ 78.5% - 79.0% ] 78.99% | 2,713 | 43.2% |
[ 79.0% - 79.5% ] 79.26% | 4,538 | 49.2% |
[ 83.0% - 83.5% ] 83.14% | 4,139 | 46.1% |
[ 84.5% - 85.0% ] 84.86% | 733 | 50.2% |
[ 85.5% - 86.0% ] 85.85% | 615 | 19.4% |
[ 86.5% - 87.0% ] 86.98% | 3,265 | 42.8% |
[ 90.5% - 91.0% ] 90.94% | 806 | 42.5% |
[ 99.5% - 100.0% ] 100.00% | 486 | 79.2% |