Pima Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
COMPARE
Pima
Select to Compare
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
Pima Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
29.0%
POVERTY | CHILDREN < 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
342nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Pima Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,516,106 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Pima and poverty level among children under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.496 and weighted average of 29.0%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pima within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.31% in poverty level among children under the age of 16.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Pima and poverty level among children under the age of 16 does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Pima influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among children under the age of 16 within an area, or if Pima simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among children under the age of 16 due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Pima by Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
In terms of child poverty under the age of 16, the demographic groups most similar to Pima are Immigrants from Yemen (29.1%, a difference of 0.19%), Yuman (28.9%, a difference of 0.26%), Navajo (30.2%, a difference of 4.2%), Lumbee (31.0%, a difference of 6.8%), and Hopi (27.1%, a difference of 7.1%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 |
| Immigrants from Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 24.0% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 24.4% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 24.9% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 25.1% |
| Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 25.2% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 25.4% |
| Crow | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 26.0% |
| Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 27.1% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 28.9% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 29.0% |
| Immigrants from Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 29.1% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 30.2% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 31.0% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 31.7% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 32.5% |
Pima Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Pima Data | Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Data |
| Minimum | 0.038% | 13.1% |
| Maximum | 90.9% | 100.0% |
| Range | 90.9% | 86.9% |
| Mean | 35.6% | 39.2% |
| Median | 10.4% | 34.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.5% | 22.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 77.4% | 47.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 73.9% | 24.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 37.1% | 23.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 36.4% | 22.7% |
Correlation Details
| Pima Percentile | Sample Size | Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.038% | 60,528,575 | 20.0% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.71% | 534,489 | 23.1% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.10% | 220,748 | 24.5% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.66% | 66,702 | 13.3% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.22% | 52,609 | 17.5% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.76% | 5,078 | 22.6% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.19% | 5,800 | 45.4% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.77% | 3,426 | 28.8% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.15% | 5,836 | 22.5% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.99% | 51,096 | 13.1% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.35% | 505 | 83.2% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.94% | 1,178 | 38.1% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.01% | 1,370 | 17.3% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.57% | 115 | 24.4% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.29% | 17,659 | 38.3% |
[ 12.5% - 13.0% ] 12.92% | 387 | 46.9% |
[ 48.0% - 48.5% ] 48.39% | 965 | 20.4% |
[ 65.5% - 66.0% ] 65.79% | 114 | 100.0% |
[ 68.5% - 69.0% ] 68.98% | 332 | 36.0% |
[ 71.0% - 71.5% ] 71.13% | 478 | 60.3% |
[ 75.5% - 76.0% ] 75.80% | 1,835 | 58.2% |
[ 78.5% - 79.0% ] 78.99% | 2,713 | 41.3% |
[ 79.0% - 79.5% ] 79.26% | 4,538 | 32.4% |
[ 83.0% - 83.5% ] 83.14% | 4,139 | 45.6% |
[ 84.5% - 85.0% ] 84.86% | 733 | 23.3% |
[ 85.5% - 86.0% ] 85.85% | 615 | 89.0% |
[ 86.5% - 87.0% ] 86.98% | 3,265 | 64.8% |
[ 90.5% - 91.0% ] 90.94% | 806 | 47.4% |