Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Seniors Over the Age of 75 in Minnesota

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Highest Poverty | Seniors 75+
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Minnesota
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Seniors Over the Age of 75 in Minnesota

0.0%
100.0%
Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Seniors Over the Age of 75 in Minnesota Map

Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Seniors Over the Age of 75 in Minnesota

City Senior Poverty vs State vs National
1. Garvin 100.0% 9.5% (+90.5)#1 11.1% (+88.9)#253
2. St Anthony City Stearns County 100.0% 9.5% (+90.5)#2 11.1% (+88.9)#311
3. Ronneby 100.0% 9.5% (+90.5)#3 11.1% (+88.9)#315
4. Westport 100.0% 9.5% (+90.5)#4 11.1% (+88.9)#333
5. South End 100.0% 9.5% (+90.5)#5 11.1% (+88.9)#347
6. Farwell 100.0% 9.5% (+90.5)#6 11.1% (+88.9)#355
7. Donaldson 100.0% 9.5% (+90.5)#7 11.1% (+88.9)#391
8. Solway 80.0% 9.5% (+70.5)#8 11.1% (+68.9)#494
9. Leonidas 75.0% 9.5% (+65.5)#9 11.1% (+63.9)#569
10. Harding 70.0% 9.5% (+60.5)#10 11.1% (+58.9)#623
11. Hammond 66.7% 9.5% (+57.2)#11 11.1% (+55.6)#692
12. Welcome 65.8% 9.5% (+56.3)#12 11.1% (+54.7)#716
13. Mcgregor 60.3% 9.5% (+50.8)#13 11.1% (+49.3)#829
14. Ogema 60.0% 9.5% (+50.5)#14 11.1% (+48.9)#847
15. Finland 60.0% 9.5% (+50.5)#15 11.1% (+48.9)#853
16. Mcgrath 60.0% 9.5% (+50.5)#16 11.1% (+48.9)#869
17. Grygla 59.1% 9.5% (+49.6)#17 11.1% (+48.0)#883
18. Palisade 58.3% 9.5% (+48.8)#18 11.1% (+47.3)#906
19. Dalton 57.1% 9.5% (+47.7)#19 11.1% (+46.1)#945
20. St. John's University 53.8% 9.5% (+44.4)#20 11.1% (+42.8)#1,066
21. Buckman 50.0% 9.5% (+40.5)#21 11.1% (+38.9)#1,220
22. Gonvick 50.0% 9.5% (+40.5)#22 11.1% (+38.9)#1,247
23. Alpha 50.0% 9.5% (+40.5)#23 11.1% (+38.9)#1,274
24. Foxhome 50.0% 9.5% (+40.5)#24 11.1% (+38.9)#1,275
25. Brookston 50.0% 9.5% (+40.5)#25 11.1% (+38.9)#1,283
26. Bejou 50.0% 9.5% (+40.5)#26 11.1% (+38.9)#1,290
27. Sargeant 50.0% 9.5% (+40.5)#27 11.1% (+38.9)#1,311
28. Redby 48.4% 9.5% (+38.9)#28 11.1% (+37.3)#1,352
29. Delano 48.2% 9.5% (+38.7)#29 11.1% (+37.1)#1,363
30. Elgin 48.1% 9.5% (+38.6)#30 11.1% (+37.0)#1,368
31. Rice 47.1% 9.5% (+37.6)#31 11.1% (+36.0)#1,427
32. St Martin 45.8% 9.5% (+36.3)#32 11.1% (+34.8)#1,506
33. Kelliher 45.0% 9.5% (+35.5)#33 11.1% (+33.9)#1,557
34. Roscoe 44.4% 9.5% (+35.0)#34 11.1% (+33.4)#1,598
35. Holloway 44.4% 9.5% (+35.0)#35 11.1% (+33.4)#1,599
36. Gully 42.9% 9.5% (+33.4)#36 11.1% (+31.8)#1,715
37. Karlstad 41.9% 9.5% (+32.4)#37 11.1% (+30.9)#1,768
38. Eagle Bend 41.9% 9.5% (+32.4)#38 11.1% (+30.8)#1,773
39. Finlayson 41.7% 9.5% (+32.2)#39 11.1% (+30.6)#1,795
40. Cass Lake 40.9% 9.5% (+31.4)#40 11.1% (+29.8)#1,844
41. St Joseph 40.8% 9.5% (+31.3)#41 11.1% (+29.7)#1,850
42. Sunburg 40.0% 9.5% (+30.5)#42 11.1% (+28.9)#1,951
43. Hillman 40.0% 9.5% (+30.5)#43 11.1% (+28.9)#1,966
44. Lake Benton 38.9% 9.5% (+29.4)#44 11.1% (+27.8)#2,033
45. Kennedy 38.5% 9.5% (+29.0)#45 11.1% (+27.4)#2,082
46. Shevlin 38.5% 9.5% (+29.0)#46 11.1% (+27.4)#2,083
47. Brooten 38.4% 9.5% (+28.9)#47 11.1% (+27.3)#2,091
48. Ulen 37.8% 9.5% (+28.3)#48 11.1% (+26.8)#2,140
49. Bagley 37.5% 9.5% (+28.0)#49 11.1% (+26.4)#2,160
50. Breckenridge 36.8% 9.5% (+27.3)#50 11.1% (+25.8)#2,233
51. Hitterdal 36.5% 9.5% (+27.0)#51 11.1% (+25.5)#2,261
52. Dent 36.4% 9.5% (+26.9)#52 11.1% (+25.3)#2,284
53. Hollandale 36.0% 9.5% (+26.5)#53 11.1% (+24.9)#2,315
54. Beaver Bay 35.7% 9.5% (+26.2)#54 11.1% (+24.6)#2,346
55. Holdingford 35.3% 9.5% (+25.8)#55 11.1% (+24.2)#2,381
56. Dakota 35.3% 9.5% (+25.8)#56 11.1% (+24.2)#2,388
57. Barrett 34.8% 9.5% (+25.3)#57 11.1% (+23.7)#2,441
58. Amboy 34.7% 9.5% (+25.2)#58 11.1% (+23.6)#2,446
59. Greenbush 34.2% 9.5% (+24.8)#59 11.1% (+23.2)#2,489
60. Akeley 34.1% 9.5% (+24.7)#60 11.1% (+23.1)#2,498
61. Onamia 33.7% 9.5% (+24.2)#61 11.1% (+22.7)#2,536
62. Foley 33.5% 9.5% (+24.1)#62 11.1% (+22.5)#2,551
63. Kiester 33.3% 9.5% (+23.8)#63 11.1% (+22.3)#2,598
64. Verndale 33.3% 9.5% (+23.8)#64 11.1% (+22.3)#2,608
65. Ruthton 33.3% 9.5% (+23.8)#65 11.1% (+22.3)#2,661
66. Boyd 33.3% 9.5% (+23.8)#66 11.1% (+22.3)#2,671
67. Erhard 33.3% 9.5% (+23.8)#67 11.1% (+22.3)#2,678
68. Bena 33.3% 9.5% (+23.8)#68 11.1% (+22.3)#2,682
69. Minneiska 33.3% 9.5% (+23.8)#69 11.1% (+22.3)#2,701
70. Bruno 33.3% 9.5% (+23.8)#70 11.1% (+22.3)#2,724
71. Hill City 32.7% 9.5% (+23.2)#71 11.1% (+21.6)#2,772
72. Jeffers 31.6% 9.5% (+22.1)#72 11.1% (+20.5)#2,896
73. Pelican Rapids 31.1% 9.5% (+21.6)#73 11.1% (+20.0)#2,952
74. Pierz 31.0% 9.5% (+21.5)#74 11.1% (+20.0)#2,954
75. Starbuck 30.2% 9.5% (+20.7)#75 11.1% (+19.1)#3,084
76. Murdock 30.0% 9.5% (+20.5)#76 11.1% (+18.9)#3,128
77. Kellogg 29.8% 9.5% (+20.3)#77 11.1% (+18.7)#3,167
78. Twin Valley 29.8% 9.5% (+20.3)#78 11.1% (+18.7)#3,171
79. Morgan 29.3% 9.5% (+19.9)#79 11.1% (+18.3)#3,245
80. Browerville 29.0% 9.5% (+19.5)#80 11.1% (+17.9)#3,291
81. Hallock 28.8% 9.5% (+19.3)#81 11.1% (+17.7)#3,309
82. Sobieski 28.6% 9.5% (+19.1)#82 11.1% (+17.5)#3,370
83. Elba 28.6% 9.5% (+19.1)#83 11.1% (+17.5)#3,382
84. Parkers Prairie 28.2% 9.5% (+18.7)#84 11.1% (+17.1)#3,434
85. Aitkin 28.1% 9.5% (+18.6)#85 11.1% (+17.0)#3,443
86. Sherburn 27.8% 9.5% (+18.3)#86 11.1% (+16.8)#3,487
87. Maynard 27.8% 9.5% (+18.3)#87 11.1% (+16.7)#3,508
88. Kimball 27.6% 9.5% (+18.1)#88 11.1% (+16.5)#3,532
89. Crookston 27.4% 9.5% (+17.9)#89 11.1% (+16.4)#3,558
90. Jordan 27.0% 9.5% (+17.6)#90 11.1% (+16.0)#3,653
91. Wood Lake 26.7% 9.5% (+17.2)#91 11.1% (+15.6)#3,723
92. Sauk Centre 26.4% 9.5% (+16.9)#92 11.1% (+15.3)#3,778
93. Marble 26.3% 9.5% (+16.8)#93 11.1% (+15.2)#3,796
94. Shelly 26.3% 9.5% (+16.8)#94 11.1% (+15.2)#3,808
95. Motley 26.1% 9.5% (+16.6)#95 11.1% (+15.0)#3,852
96. Baudette 26.0% 9.5% (+16.5)#96 11.1% (+15.0)#3,864
97. Houston 26.0% 9.5% (+16.5)#97 11.1% (+14.9)#3,879
98. Rothsay 25.8% 9.5% (+16.3)#98 11.1% (+14.7)#3,923
99. Badger 25.8% 9.5% (+16.3)#99 11.1% (+14.7)#3,924
100. Eveleth 25.8% 9.5% (+16.3)#100 11.1% (+14.7)#3,932

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Seniors Over the Age of 75 in Minnesota?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Seniors Over the Age of 75 in Minnesota are:
#1
100.0%
#2
100.0%
#3
100.0%
#4
100.0%
#5
100.0%
#6
100.0%
#7
80.0%
#8
75.0%
#9
70.0%
#10
66.7%
What city has the Highest Poverty Level Among Seniors Over the Age of 75 in Minnesota?
Garvin has the Highest Poverty Level Among Seniors Over the Age of 75 in Minnesota with 100.0%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Seniors Over the Age of 75 in the State of Minnesota?
Poverty Level Among Seniors Over the Age of 75 in Minnesota is 9.5%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Seniors Over the Age of 75 in the United States?
Poverty Level Among Seniors Over the Age of 75 in the United States is 11.1%.