Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Wholesale Trade in Minnesota

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Wholesale Trade
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Minnesota
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Wholesale Trade in Minnesota

0.0%
50.0%
Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Wholesale Trade in Minnesota Map

Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Wholesale Trade in Minnesota

City % Employed vs State vs National
1. Tintah 41.4% 2.7% (+38.7)#1 2.4% (+39.0)#48
2. Clontarf 36.4% 2.7% (+33.7)#2 2.4% (+34.0)#66
3. Dovray 33.3% 2.7% (+30.6)#3 2.4% (+30.9)#81
4. Viking 29.8% 2.7% (+27.1)#4 2.4% (+27.4)#106
5. Newfolden 23.7% 2.7% (+20.9)#5 2.4% (+21.3)#163
6. Johnson 23.1% 2.7% (+20.4)#6 2.4% (+20.7)#174
7. Correll 22.2% 2.7% (+19.5)#7 2.4% (+19.8)#188
8. Thief River Falls 20.6% 2.7% (+17.9)#8 2.4% (+18.2)#212
9. Vesta 17.5% 2.7% (+14.8)#9 2.4% (+15.1)#318
10. Big Falls 17.1% 2.7% (+14.4)#10 2.4% (+14.7)#329
11. Trail 16.7% 2.7% (+14.0)#11 2.4% (+14.3)#350
12. Delhi 16.7% 2.7% (+14.0)#12 2.4% (+14.3)#351
13. Hatfield 16.7% 2.7% (+14.0)#13 2.4% (+14.3)#352
14. Kent 15.8% 2.7% (+13.1)#14 2.4% (+13.4)#377
15. St Hilaire 15.8% 2.7% (+13.0)#15 2.4% (+13.4)#379
16. Brooks 15.4% 2.7% (+12.7)#16 2.4% (+13.0)#397
17. Holt 15.4% 2.7% (+12.7)#17 2.4% (+13.0)#400
18. Halma 15.4% 2.7% (+12.7)#18 2.4% (+13.0)#404
19. Wanda 14.5% 2.7% (+11.8)#19 2.4% (+12.1)#454
20. St Leo 14.0% 2.7% (+11.3)#20 2.4% (+11.6)#490
21. Goodridge 13.9% 2.7% (+11.2)#21 2.4% (+11.5)#499
22. Tonka Bay 13.8% 2.7% (+11.1)#22 2.4% (+11.4)#502
23. Plummer 13.1% 2.7% (+10.4)#23 2.4% (+10.7)#560
24. Comstock 12.8% 2.7% (+10.1)#24 2.4% (+10.4)#584
25. Chisholm 12.6% 2.7% (+9.90)#25 2.4% (+10.2)#601
26. Round Lake 12.5% 2.7% (+9.84)#26 2.4% (+10.1)#606
27. Peterson 12.1% 2.7% (+9.41)#27 2.4% (+9.72)#660
28. Minnetonka Beach 11.7% 2.7% (+8.96)#28 2.4% (+9.27)#706
29. Slayton 11.5% 2.7% (+8.79)#29 2.4% (+9.10)#729
30. Campbell 11.3% 2.7% (+8.58)#30 2.4% (+8.89)#751
31. Badger 10.9% 2.7% (+8.20)#31 2.4% (+8.51)#799
32. Echo 10.7% 2.7% (+7.98)#32 2.4% (+8.29)#833
33. Lengby 10.5% 2.7% (+7.82)#33 2.4% (+8.12)#862
34. La Salle 10.2% 2.7% (+7.49)#34 2.4% (+7.80)#906
35. Sleepy Eye 10.2% 2.7% (+7.49)#35 2.4% (+7.80)#907
36. Stephen 10.0% 2.7% (+7.33)#36 2.4% (+7.64)#925
37. Altura 10.0% 2.7% (+7.29)#37 2.4% (+7.60)#934
38. Borup 10.0% 2.7% (+7.29)#38 2.4% (+7.60)#941
39. Karlstad 9.9% 2.7% (+7.19)#39 2.4% (+7.50)#964
40. Danube 9.9% 2.7% (+7.16)#40 2.4% (+7.46)#971
41. Middle River 9.5% 2.7% (+6.75)#41 2.4% (+7.06)#1,059
42. Dennison 9.2% 2.7% (+6.47)#42 2.4% (+6.78)#1,119
43. Buffalo Lake 9.1% 2.7% (+6.43)#43 2.4% (+6.74)#1,126
44. Deer Creek 9.1% 2.7% (+6.38)#44 2.4% (+6.69)#1,139
45. De Graff 9.1% 2.7% (+6.38)#45 2.4% (+6.69)#1,149
46. Red Lake Falls 9.0% 2.7% (+6.31)#46 2.4% (+6.62)#1,163
47. Lake Wilson 8.5% 2.7% (+5.78)#47 2.4% (+6.09)#1,314
48. Ottertail 8.5% 2.7% (+5.75)#48 2.4% (+6.06)#1,317
49. Sebeka 8.4% 2.7% (+5.72)#49 2.4% (+6.03)#1,322
50. Grygla 8.4% 2.7% (+5.69)#50 2.4% (+6.00)#1,333
51. Whalan 8.3% 2.7% (+5.62)#51 2.4% (+5.93)#1,360
52. Mayer 8.3% 2.7% (+5.56)#52 2.4% (+5.87)#1,387
53. Brandon 8.2% 2.7% (+5.49)#53 2.4% (+5.80)#1,407
54. Rutledge 8.0% 2.7% (+5.29)#54 2.4% (+5.60)#1,460
55. Hitterdal 7.9% 2.7% (+5.16)#55 2.4% (+5.47)#1,507
56. Wadena 7.8% 2.7% (+5.08)#56 2.4% (+5.39)#1,538
57. Lake Elmo 7.8% 2.7% (+5.07)#57 2.4% (+5.38)#1,541
58. Beltrami 7.7% 2.7% (+4.98)#58 2.4% (+5.29)#1,581
59. Hanover 7.6% 2.7% (+4.90)#59 2.4% (+5.21)#1,598
60. Silver Creek 7.6% 2.7% (+4.87)#60 2.4% (+5.17)#1,613
61. Akeley 7.6% 2.7% (+4.85)#61 2.4% (+5.16)#1,620
62. Bird Island 7.5% 2.7% (+4.83)#62 2.4% (+5.14)#1,630
63. Excelsior 7.5% 2.7% (+4.81)#63 2.4% (+5.12)#1,634
64. Lyle 7.5% 2.7% (+4.80)#64 2.4% (+5.11)#1,639
65. Clinton 7.5% 2.7% (+4.79)#65 2.4% (+5.10)#1,645
66. Holland 7.4% 2.7% (+4.72)#66 2.4% (+5.03)#1,657
67. Lamberton 7.4% 2.7% (+4.71)#67 2.4% (+5.02)#1,668
68. Ronneby 7.4% 2.7% (+4.70)#68 2.4% (+5.01)#1,682
69. Houston 7.4% 2.7% (+4.66)#69 2.4% (+4.96)#1,694
70. Currie 7.4% 2.7% (+4.64)#70 2.4% (+4.95)#1,702
71. Albertville 7.3% 2.7% (+4.63)#71 2.4% (+4.93)#1,709
72. Bowlus 7.2% 2.7% (+4.53)#72 2.4% (+4.84)#1,749
73. Hewitt 7.2% 2.7% (+4.49)#73 2.4% (+4.80)#1,762
74. Hoyt Lakes 7.1% 2.7% (+4.43)#74 2.4% (+4.74)#1,792
75. Murdock 7.1% 2.7% (+4.43)#75 2.4% (+4.74)#1,803
76. Baker 7.1% 2.7% (+4.43)#76 2.4% (+4.74)#1,817
77. Sacred Heart 7.1% 2.7% (+4.37)#77 2.4% (+4.68)#1,839
78. Gibbon 7.0% 2.7% (+4.34)#78 2.4% (+4.64)#1,859
79. Clements 7.0% 2.7% (+4.31)#79 2.4% (+4.62)#1,879
80. Ostrander 6.9% 2.7% (+4.21)#80 2.4% (+4.52)#1,922
81. Greenbush 6.9% 2.7% (+4.19)#81 2.4% (+4.50)#1,934
82. Le Center 6.9% 2.7% (+4.16)#82 2.4% (+4.46)#1,958
83. Hills 6.8% 2.7% (+4.14)#83 2.4% (+4.44)#1,967
84. St Michael 6.7% 2.7% (+4.01)#84 2.4% (+4.32)#2,037
85. Hanska 6.7% 2.7% (+4.00)#85 2.4% (+4.31)#2,041
86. Bingham Lake 6.7% 2.7% (+3.96)#86 2.4% (+4.27)#2,066
87. Arco 6.7% 2.7% (+3.96)#87 2.4% (+4.27)#2,072
88. Hadley 6.7% 2.7% (+3.96)#88 2.4% (+4.27)#2,075
89. Staples 6.5% 2.7% (+3.80)#89 2.4% (+4.11)#2,150
90. Madison 6.4% 2.7% (+3.67)#90 2.4% (+3.98)#2,221
91. Dumont 6.4% 2.7% (+3.67)#91 2.4% (+3.98)#2,225
92. Stanchfield 6.4% 2.7% (+3.67)#92 2.4% (+3.98)#2,227
93. Carlos 6.4% 2.7% (+3.67)#93 2.4% (+3.97)#2,230
94. Mcintosh 6.3% 2.7% (+3.56)#94 2.4% (+3.86)#2,301
95. Sargeant 6.2% 2.7% (+3.54)#95 2.4% (+3.85)#2,329
96. Watkins 6.2% 2.7% (+3.53)#96 2.4% (+3.83)#2,337
97. Russell 6.2% 2.7% (+3.50)#97 2.4% (+3.81)#2,360
98. Tyler 6.2% 2.7% (+3.47)#98 2.4% (+3.78)#2,373
99. Barrett 6.2% 2.7% (+3.46)#99 2.4% (+3.77)#2,380
100. Le Roy 6.2% 2.7% (+3.46)#100 2.4% (+3.77)#2,384

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Wholesale Trade in Minnesota?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Wholesale Trade in Minnesota are:
#1
41.4%
#2
36.4%
#3
33.3%
#4
29.8%
#5
23.7%
#6
23.1%
#7
22.2%
#8
20.6%
#9
17.5%
#10
17.1%
What city has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Wholesale Trade in Minnesota?
Tintah has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Wholesale Trade in Minnesota with 41.4%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Wholesale Trade in the State of Minnesota?
Percentage of Population Employed in Wholesale Trade in Minnesota is 2.7%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Wholesale Trade in the United States?
Percentage of Population Employed in Wholesale Trade in the United States is 2.4%.