Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Accommodation & Food Services in Minnesota

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Accommodation & Food Services
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Minnesota
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Accommodation & Food Services in Minnesota

0.0%
60.0%
Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Accommodation & Food Services in Minnesota Map

Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Accommodation & Food Services in Minnesota

City % Employed vs State vs National
1. Winton 52.6% 5.5% (+47.1)#1 6.9% (+45.8)#134
2. Hubbard 44.4% 5.5% (+38.9)#2 6.9% (+37.6)#219
3. Hazel Run 37.0% 5.5% (+31.5)#3 6.9% (+30.2)#312
4. Gully 36.7% 5.5% (+31.2)#4 6.9% (+29.8)#322
5. Lutsen 33.6% 5.5% (+28.1)#5 6.9% (+26.7)#374
6. Walters 30.0% 5.5% (+24.5)#6 6.9% (+23.1)#484
7. Evan 28.2% 5.5% (+22.7)#7 6.9% (+21.3)#552
8. Kinney 28.0% 5.5% (+22.5)#8 6.9% (+21.1)#566
9. Walker 25.1% 5.5% (+19.6)#9 6.9% (+18.3)#720
10. Spring Hill 23.4% 5.5% (+17.9)#10 6.9% (+16.6)#863
11. Landfall 23.3% 5.5% (+17.7)#11 6.9% (+16.4)#883
12. Johnson 23.1% 5.5% (+17.6)#12 6.9% (+16.2)#899
13. Ebro 21.4% 5.5% (+15.9)#13 6.9% (+14.5)#1,065
14. Hilltop 21.2% 5.5% (+15.6)#14 6.9% (+14.3)#1,099
15. Erhard 20.0% 5.5% (+14.5)#15 6.9% (+13.1)#1,248
16. Homer 19.0% 5.5% (+13.5)#16 6.9% (+12.2)#1,412
17. Pine River 18.4% 5.5% (+12.9)#17 6.9% (+11.5)#1,533
18. Mcgregor 18.3% 5.5% (+12.8)#18 6.9% (+11.4)#1,546
19. Hill City 18.0% 5.5% (+12.5)#19 6.9% (+11.1)#1,624
20. Garrison 17.9% 5.5% (+12.3)#20 6.9% (+11.0)#1,648
21. Morton 17.8% 5.5% (+12.3)#21 6.9% (+10.9)#1,656
22. Trommald 17.8% 5.5% (+12.3)#22 6.9% (+10.9)#1,663
23. Bruno 17.6% 5.5% (+12.1)#23 6.9% (+10.8)#1,694
24. Grand Marais 17.3% 5.5% (+11.8)#24 6.9% (+10.5)#1,750
25. Donnelly 17.3% 5.5% (+11.8)#25 6.9% (+10.4)#1,754
26. Ironton 16.9% 5.5% (+11.4)#26 6.9% (+10.0)#1,857
27. Bellingham 16.7% 5.5% (+11.2)#27 6.9% (+9.79)#1,904
28. Delhi 16.7% 5.5% (+11.2)#28 6.9% (+9.79)#1,917
29. Spicer 16.5% 5.5% (+11.0)#29 6.9% (+9.60)#1,961
30. Pease 16.2% 5.5% (+10.7)#30 6.9% (+9.36)#2,022
31. Watson 16.1% 5.5% (+10.6)#31 6.9% (+9.25)#2,060
32. Campbell 16.1% 5.5% (+10.6)#32 6.9% (+9.25)#2,061
33. Iona 16.1% 5.5% (+10.6)#33 6.9% (+9.19)#2,082
34. Nassau 15.8% 5.5% (+10.3)#34 6.9% (+8.91)#2,174
35. Boyd 15.4% 5.5% (+9.87)#35 6.9% (+8.50)#2,303
36. Forada 15.4% 5.5% (+9.87)#36 6.9% (+8.50)#2,305
37. Two Harbors 15.4% 5.5% (+9.86)#37 6.9% (+8.50)#2,311
38. Akeley 15.1% 5.5% (+9.61)#38 6.9% (+8.25)#2,390
39. Ghent 14.9% 5.5% (+9.40)#39 6.9% (+8.04)#2,478
40. St. John's University 14.6% 5.5% (+9.13)#40 6.9% (+7.76)#2,575
41. Park Rapids 14.5% 5.5% (+9.02)#41 6.9% (+7.66)#2,623
42. Tamarack 14.3% 5.5% (+8.77)#42 6.9% (+7.40)#2,737
43. Midway 14.3% 5.5% (+8.77)#43 6.9% (+7.40)#2,746
44. Crown College 14.0% 5.5% (+8.45)#44 6.9% (+7.08)#2,864
45. Clear Lake 13.9% 5.5% (+8.43)#45 6.9% (+7.06)#2,871
46. Cyrus 13.8% 5.5% (+8.28)#46 6.9% (+6.91)#2,945
47. Finland 13.6% 5.5% (+8.12)#47 6.9% (+6.76)#3,034
48. Jenkins 13.3% 5.5% (+7.74)#48 6.9% (+6.37)#3,234
49. Crosslake 13.2% 5.5% (+7.67)#49 6.9% (+6.31)#3,260
50. Bemidji 13.1% 5.5% (+7.59)#50 6.9% (+6.22)#3,315
51. Nelson 13.0% 5.5% (+7.45)#51 6.9% (+6.08)#3,387
52. Spring Park 13.0% 5.5% (+7.44)#52 6.9% (+6.07)#3,390
53. Maynard 12.8% 5.5% (+7.30)#53 6.9% (+5.94)#3,474
54. Sargeant 12.5% 5.5% (+6.98)#54 6.9% (+5.62)#3,693
55. Franklin 12.4% 5.5% (+6.88)#55 6.9% (+5.52)#3,743
56. Pipestone 12.4% 5.5% (+6.84)#56 6.9% (+5.47)#3,781
57. Foxhome 12.3% 5.5% (+6.77)#57 6.9% (+5.40)#3,826
58. Taylors Falls 12.2% 5.5% (+6.66)#58 6.9% (+5.30)#3,887
59. Deerwood 12.0% 5.5% (+6.53)#59 6.9% (+5.17)#3,970
60. Pequot Lakes 12.0% 5.5% (+6.48)#60 6.9% (+5.12)#4,003
61. Cold Spring 11.9% 5.5% (+6.42)#61 6.9% (+5.06)#4,048
62. Big Falls 11.8% 5.5% (+6.33)#62 6.9% (+4.96)#4,124
63. Currie 11.8% 5.5% (+6.25)#63 6.9% (+4.88)#4,181
64. Elba 11.8% 5.5% (+6.25)#64 6.9% (+4.88)#4,186
65. Strandquist 11.6% 5.5% (+6.11)#65 6.9% (+4.75)#4,282
66. Crosby 11.5% 5.5% (+6.02)#66 6.9% (+4.66)#4,333
67. Soudan 11.5% 5.5% (+6.00)#67 6.9% (+4.64)#4,350
68. Brandon 11.5% 5.5% (+5.96)#68 6.9% (+4.59)#4,381
69. Nisswa 11.4% 5.5% (+5.92)#69 6.9% (+4.55)#4,421
70. New Trier 11.4% 5.5% (+5.85)#70 6.9% (+4.48)#4,463
71. Steen 11.3% 5.5% (+5.81)#71 6.9% (+4.44)#4,506
72. Jasper 11.3% 5.5% (+5.79)#72 6.9% (+4.43)#4,516
73. Elbow Lake 11.3% 5.5% (+5.74)#73 6.9% (+4.37)#4,566
74. Luverne 11.2% 5.5% (+5.68)#74 6.9% (+4.32)#4,620
75. Silver Lake 11.2% 5.5% (+5.67)#75 6.9% (+4.31)#4,626
76. Whalan 11.1% 5.5% (+5.60)#76 6.9% (+4.23)#4,699
77. Hendricks 11.1% 5.5% (+5.55)#77 6.9% (+4.19)#4,725
78. Motley 11.0% 5.5% (+5.52)#78 6.9% (+4.16)#4,748
79. Riverland 11.0% 5.5% (+5.44)#79 6.9% (+4.08)#4,813
80. Elkton 11.0% 5.5% (+5.44)#80 6.9% (+4.08)#4,814
81. Littlefork 10.9% 5.5% (+5.39)#81 6.9% (+4.02)#4,862
82. Morris 10.9% 5.5% (+5.38)#82 6.9% (+4.01)#4,869
83. Isanti 10.7% 5.5% (+5.22)#83 6.9% (+3.86)#5,007
84. Underwood 10.7% 5.5% (+5.22)#84 6.9% (+3.85)#5,015
85. Aldrich 10.5% 5.5% (+5.01)#85 6.9% (+3.65)#5,199
86. Brook Park 10.4% 5.5% (+4.93)#86 6.9% (+3.57)#5,274
87. La Prairie 10.4% 5.5% (+4.92)#87 6.9% (+3.55)#5,288
88. Pine Point 10.3% 5.5% (+4.83)#88 6.9% (+3.46)#5,390
89. Searles 10.3% 5.5% (+4.74)#89 6.9% (+3.38)#5,503
90. Hammond 10.2% 5.5% (+4.71)#90 6.9% (+3.35)#5,529
91. Medford 10.2% 5.5% (+4.71)#91 6.9% (+3.34)#5,533
92. Detroit Lakes 10.2% 5.5% (+4.67)#92 6.9% (+3.30)#5,584
93. Brainerd 10.2% 5.5% (+4.64)#93 6.9% (+3.28)#5,615
94. New Auburn 10.2% 5.5% (+4.64)#94 6.9% (+3.28)#5,616
95. Elmdale 10.1% 5.5% (+4.60)#95 6.9% (+3.24)#5,657
96. Eitzen 10.1% 5.5% (+4.56)#96 6.9% (+3.20)#5,695
97. Clearwater 10.0% 5.5% (+4.52)#97 6.9% (+3.15)#5,735
98. Wanamingo 10.0% 5.5% (+4.50)#98 6.9% (+3.14)#5,754
99. Wahkon 10.0% 5.5% (+4.48)#99 6.9% (+3.12)#5,773
100. Arco 10.0% 5.5% (+4.48)#100 6.9% (+3.12)#5,793

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Accommodation & Food Services in Minnesota?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Accommodation & Food Services in Minnesota are:
#1
52.6%
#2
37.0%
#3
36.7%
#4
33.6%
#5
30.0%
#6
28.2%
#7
28.0%
#8
25.1%
#9
23.4%
#10
23.3%
What city has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Accommodation & Food Services in Minnesota?
Winton has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Accommodation & Food Services in Minnesota with 52.6%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Accommodation & Food Services in the State of Minnesota?
Percentage of Population Employed in Accommodation & Food Services in Minnesota is 5.5%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Accommodation & Food Services in the United States?
Percentage of Population Employed in Accommodation & Food Services in the United States is 6.9%.