Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Married Couples in Minnesota

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Highest Poverty | Married Couple
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Minnesota
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Married Couples in Minnesota

0.0%
100.0%
Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Married Couples in Minnesota Map

Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Married Couples in Minnesota

City Married Couples Poverty vs State vs National
1. Funkley 100.0% 2.6% (+97.4)#1 4.5% (+95.5)#77
2. Nashua 80.0% 2.6% (+77.4)#2 4.5% (+75.5)#131
3. Sedan 50.0% 2.6% (+47.4)#3 4.5% (+45.5)#400
4. Williams 46.2% 2.6% (+43.6)#4 4.5% (+41.7)#463
5. Hillman 40.0% 2.6% (+37.4)#5 4.5% (+35.5)#636
6. Redby 33.3% 2.6% (+30.8)#6 4.5% (+28.9)#866
7. Bruno 33.3% 2.6% (+30.8)#7 4.5% (+28.9)#893
8. Kiester 24.3% 2.6% (+21.8)#8 4.5% (+19.9)#1,509
9. Osage 21.2% 2.6% (+18.6)#9 4.5% (+16.8)#1,886
10. Longville 20.5% 2.6% (+17.9)#10 4.5% (+16.1)#1,984
11. Naytahwaush 20.0% 2.6% (+17.4)#11 4.5% (+15.5)#2,037
12. Kelliher 20.0% 2.6% (+17.4)#12 4.5% (+15.5)#2,041
13. Wright 20.0% 2.6% (+17.4)#13 4.5% (+15.5)#2,065
14. Georgetown 20.0% 2.6% (+17.4)#14 4.5% (+15.5)#2,076
15. Landfall 19.1% 2.6% (+16.5)#15 4.5% (+14.6)#2,193
16. Welcome 18.9% 2.6% (+16.3)#16 4.5% (+14.4)#2,232
17. Laporte 18.8% 2.6% (+16.2)#17 4.5% (+14.3)#2,266
18. Roscoe 18.2% 2.6% (+15.6)#18 4.5% (+13.7)#2,370
19. Goodridge 18.2% 2.6% (+15.6)#19 4.5% (+13.7)#2,373
20. Erhard 17.4% 2.6% (+14.8)#20 4.5% (+12.9)#2,536
21. Mapleview 16.7% 2.6% (+14.1)#21 4.5% (+12.2)#2,697
22. Leonidas 16.7% 2.6% (+14.1)#22 4.5% (+12.2)#2,708
23. Nassau 16.7% 2.6% (+14.1)#23 4.5% (+12.2)#2,710
24. Sanborn 16.5% 2.6% (+13.9)#24 4.5% (+12.0)#2,730
25. Villard 16.4% 2.6% (+13.8)#25 4.5% (+12.0)#2,742
26. Myrtle 15.4% 2.6% (+12.8)#26 4.5% (+10.9)#3,005
27. Zimmerman 15.4% 2.6% (+12.8)#27 4.5% (+10.9)#3,008
28. Franklin 15.3% 2.6% (+12.7)#28 4.5% (+10.8)#3,018
29. Royalton 15.1% 2.6% (+12.5)#29 4.5% (+10.6)#3,068
30. Sebeka 15.1% 2.6% (+12.5)#30 4.5% (+10.6)#3,069
31. Odessa 15.0% 2.6% (+12.4)#31 4.5% (+10.5)#3,090
32. Nielsville 15.0% 2.6% (+12.4)#32 4.5% (+10.5)#3,091
33. Staples 14.7% 2.6% (+12.2)#33 4.5% (+10.3)#3,157
34. Adrian 14.5% 2.6% (+11.9)#34 4.5% (+10.1)#3,224
35. Eveleth 14.4% 2.6% (+11.9)#35 4.5% (+9.98)#3,250
36. Barnum 14.4% 2.6% (+11.8)#36 4.5% (+9.95)#3,256
37. Appleton 14.3% 2.6% (+11.7)#37 4.5% (+9.82)#3,278
38. Gully 14.3% 2.6% (+11.7)#38 4.5% (+9.82)#3,329
39. Lengby 14.3% 2.6% (+11.7)#39 4.5% (+9.82)#3,330
40. Humboldt 14.3% 2.6% (+11.7)#40 4.5% (+9.82)#3,333
41. Graceville 14.2% 2.6% (+11.6)#41 4.5% (+9.72)#3,355
42. Shelly 13.8% 2.6% (+11.2)#42 4.5% (+9.33)#3,462
43. Lewisville 13.5% 2.6% (+10.9)#43 4.5% (+9.05)#3,553
44. Arco 13.3% 2.6% (+10.8)#44 4.5% (+8.87)#3,637
45. Waldorf 12.9% 2.6% (+10.3)#45 4.5% (+8.44)#3,786
46. Houston 12.7% 2.6% (+10.2)#46 4.5% (+8.27)#3,849
47. Ihlen 12.5% 2.6% (+9.93)#47 4.5% (+8.04)#3,966
48. Taopi 12.5% 2.6% (+9.93)#48 4.5% (+8.04)#3,974
49. Jasper 12.3% 2.6% (+9.69)#49 4.5% (+7.80)#4,052
50. Waite Park 12.2% 2.6% (+9.58)#50 4.5% (+7.69)#4,095
51. Storden 12.1% 2.6% (+9.50)#51 4.5% (+7.61)#4,144
52. Beardsley 12.0% 2.6% (+9.43)#52 4.5% (+7.54)#4,179
53. Taunton 12.0% 2.6% (+9.43)#53 4.5% (+7.54)#4,182
54. Hanska 11.9% 2.6% (+9.37)#54 4.5% (+7.48)#4,204
55. Menahga 11.9% 2.6% (+9.29)#55 4.5% (+7.40)#4,230
56. Wykoff 11.8% 2.6% (+9.27)#56 4.5% (+7.38)#4,247
57. Bluffton 11.8% 2.6% (+9.19)#57 4.5% (+7.30)#4,289
58. Fort Ripley 11.8% 2.6% (+9.19)#58 4.5% (+7.30)#4,298
59. Dassel 11.7% 2.6% (+9.09)#59 4.5% (+7.20)#4,330
60. Lansing 11.5% 2.6% (+8.97)#60 4.5% (+7.08)#4,394
61. Peterson 11.4% 2.6% (+8.79)#61 4.5% (+6.90)#4,459
62. Claremont 11.3% 2.6% (+8.77)#62 4.5% (+6.88)#4,474
63. Renville 11.2% 2.6% (+8.63)#63 4.5% (+6.74)#4,532
64. Ogema 11.1% 2.6% (+8.54)#64 4.5% (+6.65)#4,586
65. Spring Hill 11.1% 2.6% (+8.54)#65 4.5% (+6.65)#4,608
66. La Salle 11.1% 2.6% (+8.54)#66 4.5% (+6.65)#4,616
67. Louisburg 11.1% 2.6% (+8.54)#67 4.5% (+6.65)#4,622
68. Clarks Grove 11.0% 2.6% (+8.47)#68 4.5% (+6.58)#4,636
69. Comfrey 11.0% 2.6% (+8.39)#69 4.5% (+6.50)#4,674
70. Milroy 10.9% 2.6% (+8.34)#70 4.5% (+6.45)#4,708
71. Wendell 10.8% 2.6% (+8.24)#71 4.5% (+6.35)#4,757
72. Miltona 10.8% 2.6% (+8.18)#72 4.5% (+6.29)#4,782
73. Hilltop 10.7% 2.6% (+8.14)#73 4.5% (+6.25)#4,798
74. Harding 10.7% 2.6% (+8.14)#74 4.5% (+6.25)#4,811
75. Isanti 10.7% 2.6% (+8.09)#75 4.5% (+6.20)#4,841
76. Remer 10.6% 2.6% (+8.07)#76 4.5% (+6.18)#4,856
77. Federal Dam 10.5% 2.6% (+7.95)#77 4.5% (+6.06)#4,930
78. Walnut Grove 10.4% 2.6% (+7.86)#78 4.5% (+5.97)#4,986
79. Magnolia 10.3% 2.6% (+7.68)#79 4.5% (+5.79)#5,097
80. Wolverton 10.0% 2.6% (+7.43)#80 4.5% (+5.54)#5,267
81. New Trier 10.0% 2.6% (+7.43)#81 4.5% (+5.54)#5,278
82. Jordan 9.8% 2.6% (+7.27)#82 4.5% (+5.38)#5,359
83. Winger 9.7% 2.6% (+7.11)#83 4.5% (+5.22)#5,470
84. Raymond 9.6% 2.6% (+7.01)#84 4.5% (+5.12)#5,521
85. Little Falls 9.5% 2.6% (+6.97)#85 4.5% (+5.08)#5,542
86. Glenwood 9.5% 2.6% (+6.97)#86 4.5% (+5.08)#5,543
87. Darwin 9.5% 2.6% (+6.95)#87 4.5% (+5.06)#5,561
88. Sandstone 9.5% 2.6% (+6.90)#88 4.5% (+5.01)#5,596
89. Trimont 9.4% 2.6% (+6.88)#89 4.5% (+4.99)#5,616
90. St Marys Point 9.3% 2.6% (+6.77)#90 4.5% (+4.88)#5,691
91. Hill City 9.3% 2.6% (+6.73)#91 4.5% (+4.84)#5,711
92. St Joseph 9.3% 2.6% (+6.71)#92 4.5% (+4.82)#5,723
93. Balaton 9.0% 2.6% (+6.44)#93 4.5% (+4.55)#5,974
94. Deerwood 8.9% 2.6% (+6.32)#94 4.5% (+4.43)#6,053
95. Murdock 8.9% 2.6% (+6.32)#95 4.5% (+4.43)#6,057
96. Ulen 8.8% 2.6% (+6.25)#96 4.5% (+4.36)#6,109
97. Nevis 8.8% 2.6% (+6.22)#97 4.5% (+4.33)#6,130
98. Geneva 8.7% 2.6% (+6.18)#98 4.5% (+4.29)#6,160
99. Sacred Heart 8.7% 2.6% (+6.17)#99 4.5% (+4.28)#6,169
100. Badger 8.6% 2.6% (+6.05)#100 4.5% (+4.16)#6,248

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Married Couples in Minnesota?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Married Couples in Minnesota are:
#1
100.0%
#2
80.0%
#3
50.0%
#4
46.2%
#5
40.0%
#6
33.3%
#7
33.3%
#8
24.3%
#9
21.2%
#10
20.5%
What city has the Highest Poverty Level Among Married Couples in Minnesota?
Funkley has the Highest Poverty Level Among Married Couples in Minnesota with 100.0%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Married Couples in the State of Minnesota?
Poverty Level Among Married Couples in Minnesota is 2.6%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Married Couples in the United States?
Poverty Level Among Married Couples in the United States is 4.5%.