Houma Female Poverty
COMPARE
Houma
Select to Compare
Female Poverty
Houma Female Poverty
20.0%
POVERTY | FEMALES
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
334th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Houma Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 36,796,778 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Houma and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.874 and weighted average of 20.0%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Houma within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.83% in poverty level among females.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Houma and poverty level among females does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Houma influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among females within an area, or if Houma simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among females due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Houma by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Houma are Cheyenne (20.2%, a difference of 0.77%), Pueblo (20.7%, a difference of 3.2%), Immigrants from Dominican Republic (19.3%, a difference of 3.6%), Yuman (20.8%, a difference of 4.0%), and Apache (19.2%, a difference of 4.2%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 18.0% |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 18.6% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 18.6% |
Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 19.1% |
Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 19.2% |
Apache | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 19.2% |
Immigrants from Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 19.3% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 20.0% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 20.2% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 20.7% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 20.8% |
Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 20.9% |
Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 21.0% |
Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 21.5% |
Crow | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 22.1% |
Houma Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Houma Data | Female Poverty Data |
Minimum | 0.012% | 8.5% |
Maximum | 44.9% | 53.9% |
Range | 44.9% | 45.4% |
Mean | 6.5% | 22.3% |
Median | 3.3% | 19.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.5% | 16.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.0% | 24.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.6% | 7.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.3% | 9.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.1% | 9.7% |
Correlation Details
Houma Percentile | Sample Size | Female Poverty |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.012% | 35,258,017 | 17.5% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.28% | 573,737 | 21.3% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.52% | 304,570 | 14.9% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.71% | 264,900 | 16.8% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.93% | 85,949 | 18.4% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.10% | 43,230 | 24.4% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.32% | 4,545 | 10.4% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.47% | 25,087 | 20.5% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.77% | 15,031 | 18.8% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.89% | 11,415 | 16.9% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.09% | 8,600 | 24.6% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.58% | 9,287 | 15.8% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.71% | 7,961 | 13.3% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 3.00% | 26,788 | 18.9% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.09% | 5,118 | 8.5% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.31% | 5,677 | 17.9% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.56% | 33,094 | 20.1% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.79% | 15,373 | 19.0% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.21% | 11,624 | 20.7% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.40% | 2,386 | 17.0% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.63% | 30,192 | 24.8% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.16% | 35,760 | 18.1% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.46% | 5,845 | 15.7% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.04% | 3,762 | 25.8% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.34% | 286 | 34.7% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.99% | 2,880 | 24.2% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.84% | 2,511 | 21.1% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.82% | 194 | 33.3% |
[ 14.0% - 14.5% ] 14.18% | 1,347 | 35.4% |
[ 40.5% - 41.0% ] 40.88% | 844 | 47.8% |
[ 44.5% - 45.0% ] 44.92% | 768 | 53.9% |