Houma Disability Age Over 75
COMPARE
Houma
Select to Compare
Disability Age Over 75
Houma Disability Age Over 75
56.2%
DISABILITY | AGE OVER 75
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
341st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Houma Disability Age Over 75 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 36,766,477 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Houma and percentage of population with a disability over the age of 75 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.682 and weighted average of 56.2%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Houma within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.98% in percentage of population with a disability over the age of 75.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Houma and percentage of population with a disability over the age of 75 does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Houma influences an upward or downward trend in the level of percentage of population with a disability over the age of 75 within an area, or if Houma simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of percentage of population with a disability over the age of 75 due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Houma by Disability Age Over 75
In terms of disability age over 75, the demographic groups most similar to Houma are Lumbee (56.2%, a difference of 0.16%), Pueblo (55.9%, a difference of 0.51%), Pima (55.8%, a difference of 0.59%), Tohono O'odham (56.7%, a difference of 1.0%), and Colville (55.4%, a difference of 1.4%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability Age Over 75 |
Apache | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 53.6% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 54.0% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 54.2% |
Immigrants from Armenia | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 54.3% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 54.4% |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 55.4% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 55.8% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 55.9% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 56.2% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 56.2% |
Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 56.7% |
Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 58.3% |
Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 58.4% |
Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 59.2% |
Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 61.1% |
Houma Disability Age Over 75 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Houma Data | Disability Age Over 75 Data |
Minimum | 0.012% | 33.5% |
Maximum | 44.9% | 94.7% |
Range | 44.9% | 61.3% |
Mean | 6.3% | 59.7% |
Median | 3.1% | 56.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.4% | 50.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.3% | 67.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.9% | 17.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.6% | 15.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.4% | 14.9% |
Correlation Details
Houma Percentile | Sample Size | Disability Age Over 75 |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.012% | 35,238,508 | 49.0% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.27% | 564,898 | 52.4% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.52% | 304,570 | 52.8% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.71% | 264,900 | 56.1% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.93% | 85,949 | 45.8% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.10% | 41,757 | 68.4% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.32% | 4,545 | 58.7% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.47% | 25,087 | 46.4% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.77% | 15,031 | 54.7% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.89% | 11,415 | 58.2% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.09% | 8,600 | 67.4% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.58% | 9,287 | 49.5% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.71% | 7,961 | 51.4% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 3.00% | 26,788 | 62.4% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.09% | 5,118 | 40.1% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.31% | 5,677 | 73.5% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.56% | 33,094 | 57.9% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.79% | 15,373 | 74.2% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.21% | 11,624 | 59.6% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.40% | 2,386 | 44.0% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.63% | 30,192 | 53.8% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.16% | 35,760 | 57.1% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.46% | 5,845 | 55.2% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.04% | 3,762 | 73.3% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.99% | 2,880 | 53.7% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.84% | 2,511 | 33.5% |
[ 14.0% - 14.5% ] 14.18% | 1,347 | 92.9% |
[ 40.5% - 41.0% ] 40.88% | 844 | 94.7% |
[ 44.5% - 45.0% ] 44.92% | 768 | 94.3% |