Houma vs Nepalese Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Houma
Nepalese
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Houma
Nepalese
6.4%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
279th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.5%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
289th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Houma vs Nepalese Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 36,736,486 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Houma and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.636 and weighted average of 6.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 24,514,690 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Nepalese and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.151 and weighted average of 6.5%, a difference of 2.4%.

Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Houma | Nepalese |
Minimum | 2.3% | 0.73% |
Maximum | 34.9% | 19.9% |
Range | 32.6% | 19.2% |
Mean | 8.0% | 7.5% |
Median | 6.5% | 5.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.8% | 4.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.4% | 10.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.5% | 6.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.7% | 4.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.5% | 4.9% |
Demographics Similar to Houma and Nepalese by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Houma are West Indian (6.4%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago (6.4%, a difference of 0.25%), Mexican American Indian (6.4%, a difference of 0.56%), Seminole (6.4%, a difference of 0.56%), and Indonesian (6.3%, a difference of 0.73%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Nepalese are Salvadoran (6.5%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Barbados (6.5%, a difference of 0.23%), Belizean (6.5%, a difference of 0.26%), Ecuadorian (6.5%, a difference of 0.36%), and Immigrants from Lebanon (6.6%, a difference of 0.44%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Barbadians | 0.1 /100 | #274 | Tragic 6.3% |
Choctaw | 0.1 /100 | #275 | Tragic 6.3% |
Yaqui | 0.1 /100 | #276 | Tragic 6.3% |
Indonesians | 0.1 /100 | #277 | Tragic 6.3% |
Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.1 /100 | #278 | Tragic 6.4% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 6.4% |
West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 6.4% |
Mexican American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 6.4% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 6.4% |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 6.4% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 6.4% |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 6.5% |
Guyanese | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 6.5% |
Ecuadorians | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 6.5% |
Salvadorans | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 6.5% |
Nepalese | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 6.5% |
Immigrants | Barbados | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 6.5% |
Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 6.5% |
Immigrants | Lebanon | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic 6.6% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #293 | Tragic 6.6% |
Bahamians | 0.0 /100 | #294 | Tragic 6.6% |