Houma Disability Age 35 to 64
COMPARE
Houma
Select to Compare
Disability Age 35 to 64
Houma Disability Age 35 to 64
18.7%
DISABILITY | AGE 35 TO 64
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
347th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Houma Disability Age 35 to 64 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 36,789,508 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Houma and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.824 and weighted average of 18.7%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Houma within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.99% in percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Houma and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Houma influences an upward or downward trend in the level of percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 within an area, or if Houma simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Houma by Disability Age 35 to 64
In terms of disability age 35 to 64, the demographic groups most similar to Houma are Lumbee (17.6%, a difference of 5.9%), Kiowa (17.4%, a difference of 7.7%), Yup'ik (16.9%, a difference of 10.3%), Creek (16.9%, a difference of 10.7%), and Tohono O'odham (16.7%, a difference of 11.6%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability Age 35 to 64 |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 15.8% |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 15.8% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 15.9% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 15.9% |
Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 15.9% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 16.1% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 16.1% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 16.4% |
Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 16.7% |
Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 16.7% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 16.9% |
Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 16.9% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 17.4% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 17.6% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 18.7% |
Houma Disability Age 35 to 64 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Houma Data | Disability Age 35 to 64 Data |
Minimum | 0.012% | 10.2% |
Maximum | 44.9% | 57.5% |
Range | 44.9% | 47.3% |
Mean | 6.3% | 21.7% |
Median | 3.2% | 17.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.5% | 15.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.5% | 22.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.0% | 6.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.4% | 12.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.2% | 12.3% |
Correlation Details
Houma Percentile | Sample Size | Disability Age 35 to 64 |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.012% | 35,258,017 | 12.5% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.28% | 570,558 | 18.3% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.52% | 300,673 | 16.2% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.71% | 264,900 | 16.8% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.93% | 85,949 | 19.7% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.10% | 43,230 | 25.8% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.32% | 4,545 | 11.3% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.47% | 25,087 | 16.2% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.77% | 15,031 | 16.3% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.89% | 11,415 | 29.6% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.09% | 8,600 | 17.9% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.58% | 9,287 | 16.6% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.71% | 7,961 | 11.4% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 3.00% | 26,788 | 16.4% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.09% | 5,118 | 10.2% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.31% | 5,677 | 14.2% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.56% | 33,094 | 19.3% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.79% | 15,373 | 14.8% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.21% | 11,624 | 22.1% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.40% | 2,386 | 15.4% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.63% | 30,192 | 20.3% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.16% | 35,760 | 17.4% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.46% | 5,845 | 15.7% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.04% | 3,762 | 34.0% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.34% | 286 | 11.3% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.99% | 2,880 | 21.3% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.84% | 2,511 | 24.0% |
[ 14.0% - 14.5% ] 14.18% | 1,347 | 54.7% |
[ 40.5% - 41.0% ] 40.88% | 844 | 57.5% |
[ 44.5% - 45.0% ] 44.92% | 768 | 53.7% |