Houma Female Disability
COMPARE
Houma
Select to Compare
Female Disability
Houma Female Disability
16.9%
DISABILITY | FEMALES
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
347th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Houma Female Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 36,798,615 people shows a near-perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Houma and percentage of females with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.902 and weighted average of 16.9%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Houma within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.73% in percentage of females with a disability.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Houma and percentage of females with a disability does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Houma influences an upward or downward trend in the level of percentage of females with a disability within an area, or if Houma simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of percentage of females with a disability due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Houma by Female Disability
In terms of female disability, the demographic groups most similar to Houma are Tsimshian (16.8%, a difference of 0.77%), Puerto Rican (16.6%, a difference of 1.7%), Kiowa (15.8%, a difference of 7.0%), Lumbee (15.8%, a difference of 7.1%), and Creek (15.7%, a difference of 7.9%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Disability |
| Immigrants from the Azores | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 14.9% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 14.9% |
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 14.9% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 15.0% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 15.0% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 15.0% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 15.1% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 15.2% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 15.4% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 15.7% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 16.6% |
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 16.8% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 16.9% |
Houma Female Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Houma Data | Female Disability Data |
| Minimum | 0.012% | 9.3% |
| Maximum | 44.9% | 47.8% |
| Range | 44.9% | 38.4% |
| Mean | 6.3% | 19.8% |
| Median | 3.1% | 17.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.4% | 14.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.3% | 21.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.9% | 6.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.6% | 8.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.4% | 8.4% |
Correlation Details
| Houma Percentile | Sample Size | Female Disability |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.012% | 35,258,017 | 12.8% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.28% | 575,680 | 16.8% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.52% | 304,570 | 14.9% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.71% | 265,274 | 15.9% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.93% | 85,949 | 17.6% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.10% | 43,230 | 24.4% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.32% | 4,545 | 17.3% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.47% | 25,087 | 15.9% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.77% | 15,031 | 14.6% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.89% | 11,415 | 22.1% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.09% | 8,600 | 18.0% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.58% | 9,287 | 17.7% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.71% | 7,961 | 9.3% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 3.00% | 26,788 | 15.9% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.09% | 5,118 | 18.7% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.31% | 5,677 | 14.3% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.56% | 33,094 | 14.5% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.79% | 15,373 | 20.5% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.21% | 11,624 | 16.9% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.40% | 2,386 | 19.7% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.63% | 30,192 | 16.0% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.16% | 35,760 | 15.0% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.46% | 5,845 | 14.9% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.04% | 3,762 | 24.4% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.99% | 2,880 | 24.1% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.84% | 2,511 | 17.7% |
[ 14.0% - 14.5% ] 14.18% | 1,347 | 32.8% |
[ 40.5% - 41.0% ] 40.88% | 844 | 47.8% |
[ 44.5% - 45.0% ] 44.92% | 768 | 44.3% |