Houma Family Poverty
COMPARE
Houma
Select to Compare
Family Poverty
Houma Family Poverty
14.6%
POVERTY | FAMILIES
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
334th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Houma Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 36,784,035 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Houma and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.758 and weighted average of 14.6%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Houma within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.74% in poverty level among families.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Houma and poverty level among families does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Houma influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among families within an area, or if Houma simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among families due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Houma by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Houma are Apache (14.7%, a difference of 0.85%), Immigrants from Dominican Republic (14.4%, a difference of 1.3%), Dominican (14.3%, a difference of 1.9%), Cheyenne (14.3%, a difference of 2.4%), and Native/Alaskan (14.3%, a difference of 2.5%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
| Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 13.1% |
| Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 14.3% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 14.3% |
| Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 14.3% |
| Immigrants from Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 14.6% |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 14.7% |
| Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Crow | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 16.6% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 17.0% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 17.0% |
Houma Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Houma Data | Family Poverty Data |
| Minimum | 0.012% | 6.6% |
| Maximum | 44.9% | 42.0% |
| Range | 44.9% | 35.4% |
| Mean | 6.5% | 17.7% |
| Median | 3.3% | 13.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.5% | 12.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.0% | 20.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.6% | 8.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.3% | 10.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.1% | 9.8% |
Correlation Details
| Houma Percentile | Sample Size | Family Poverty |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.012% | 35,258,017 | 12.3% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.27% | 566,858 | 14.4% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.52% | 300,673 | 10.3% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.71% | 264,900 | 11.5% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.93% | 85,949 | 12.6% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.10% | 43,230 | 20.4% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.32% | 4,545 | 6.6% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.47% | 25,087 | 13.9% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.77% | 15,031 | 13.2% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.87% | 9,448 | 18.9% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.09% | 8,600 | 20.9% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.58% | 9,287 | 8.4% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.71% | 7,961 | 14.0% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 3.00% | 26,788 | 12.9% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.09% | 5,118 | 8.1% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.31% | 5,677 | 16.7% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.56% | 33,094 | 13.8% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.79% | 15,373 | 13.2% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.21% | 11,624 | 12.0% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.40% | 2,386 | 9.0% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.63% | 30,192 | 19.6% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.16% | 35,760 | 12.9% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.46% | 5,845 | 10.5% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.04% | 3,762 | 23.8% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.34% | 286 | 37.5% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.99% | 2,880 | 12.0% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.84% | 2,511 | 16.7% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.82% | 194 | 33.3% |
[ 14.0% - 14.5% ] 14.18% | 1,347 | 38.2% |
[ 40.5% - 41.0% ] 40.88% | 844 | 40.2% |
[ 44.5% - 45.0% ] 44.92% | 768 | 42.0% |