Houma vs Immigrants from Lithuania Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Houma
 Immigrants from Lithuania
 Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Houma
Immigrants from Lithuania
6.4%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
279th/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.3%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
51st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Houma vs Immigrants from Lithuania Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 36,736,486 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Houma and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.636 and weighted average of 6.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,432,978 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Lithuania and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.052 and weighted average of 4.3%, a difference of 47.6%.
 
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Houma | Immigrants from Lithuania | 
| Minimum | 2.3% | 1.4% | 
| Maximum | 34.9% | 8.5% | 
| Range | 32.6% | 7.1% | 
| Mean | 8.0% | 4.0% | 
| Median | 6.5% | 3.6% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.8% | 2.3% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.4% | 5.4% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.5% | 3.1% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.7% | 2.1% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.5% | 2.0% | 
Similar Demographics by Married-Couple Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Houma by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Houma are West Indian (6.4%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago (6.4%, a difference of 0.25%), Mexican American Indian (6.4%, a difference of 0.56%), Seminole (6.4%, a difference of 0.56%), and Indonesian (6.3%, a difference of 0.73%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty | 
| Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.1 /100 | #272 | Tragic 6.2% | 
| Colville | 0.1 /100 | #273 | Tragic 6.3% | 
| Barbadians | 0.1 /100 | #274 | Tragic 6.3% | 
| Choctaw | 0.1 /100 | #275 | Tragic 6.3% | 
| Yaqui | 0.1 /100 | #276 | Tragic 6.3% | 
| Indonesians | 0.1 /100 | #277 | Tragic 6.3% | 
| Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.1 /100 | #278 | Tragic 6.4% | 
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 6.4% | 
| West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 6.4% | 
| Mexican American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 6.4% | 
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 6.4% | 
| Ute | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 6.4% | 
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 6.4% | 
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 6.5% | 
| Guyanese | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 6.5% | 
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Lithuania by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Lithuania are Burmese (4.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Russian (4.3%, a difference of 0.030%), Turkish (4.3%, a difference of 0.11%), Welsh (4.3%, a difference of 0.18%), and Australian (4.3%, a difference of 0.19%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty | 
| Immigrants | Japan | 99.8 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 4.3% | 
| Serbians | 99.8 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 4.3% | 
| British | 99.8 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 4.3% | 
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.8 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 4.3% | 
| Australians | 99.7 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 4.3% | 
| Turks | 99.7 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 4.3% | 
| Burmese | 99.7 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 4.3% | 
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.7 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 4.3% | 
| Russians | 99.7 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 4.3% | 
| Welsh | 99.7 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 4.3% | 
| Austrians | 99.7 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 4.3% | 
| French | 99.7 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 4.3% | 
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 99.7 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 4.3% | 
| Immigrants | Netherlands | 99.7 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 4.3% | 
| Czechoslovakians | 99.7 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 4.4% |