Houma Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Houma
Select to Compare
Single Female Poverty
Houma Single Female Poverty
33.8%
POVERTY | SINGLE FEMALES
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
345th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Houma Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 36,729,698 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Houma and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.825 and weighted average of 33.8%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Houma within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.5% in poverty level among single females.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Houma and poverty level among single females does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Houma influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among single females within an area, or if Houma simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among single females due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Houma by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Houma are Puerto Rican (34.1%, a difference of 0.92%), Tohono O'odham (34.2%, a difference of 1.2%), Lumbee (33.0%, a difference of 2.4%), Crow (32.4%, a difference of 4.3%), and Navajo (31.7%, a difference of 6.8%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Ute | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 28.4% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 28.6% |
| Immigrants from Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 28.9% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 29.1% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 29.4% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 30.3% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 30.4% |
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 30.6% |
| Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 31.3% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 31.7% |
| Crow | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 32.4% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 33.0% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 33.8% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 34.1% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 34.2% |
Houma Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Houma Data | Single Female Poverty Data |
| Minimum | 0.012% | 13.4% |
| Maximum | 44.9% | 94.8% |
| Range | 44.9% | 81.5% |
| Mean | 6.3% | 39.1% |
| Median | 3.1% | 33.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.4% | 30.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.3% | 41.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.9% | 11.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.6% | 18.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.4% | 18.4% |
Correlation Details
| Houma Percentile | Sample Size | Single Female Poverty |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.012% | 35,238,281 | 25.3% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.27% | 554,667 | 33.3% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.52% | 300,673 | 28.5% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.71% | 256,327 | 33.0% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.93% | 84,405 | 31.0% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.10% | 39,785 | 31.9% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.36% | 1,252 | 24.1% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.47% | 24,952 | 39.8% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.77% | 15,031 | 31.5% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.87% | 8,190 | 55.0% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.10% | 6,464 | 65.0% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.60% | 7,741 | 36.7% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.71% | 7,961 | 34.2% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 3.00% | 26,788 | 30.6% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.09% | 5,118 | 30.6% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.31% | 5,677 | 21.7% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.56% | 33,094 | 42.3% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.79% | 15,373 | 30.7% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.21% | 11,624 | 30.2% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.40% | 2,386 | 41.2% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.63% | 30,192 | 41.0% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.16% | 35,760 | 26.1% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.46% | 5,845 | 13.4% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.04% | 3,762 | 35.9% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.99% | 2,880 | 30.0% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.84% | 2,511 | 56.2% |
[ 14.0% - 14.5% ] 14.18% | 1,347 | 45.1% |
[ 40.5% - 41.0% ] 40.88% | 844 | 94.8% |
[ 44.5% - 45.0% ] 44.92% | 768 | 94.8% |