Houma Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds
COMPARE
Houma
Select to Compare
Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds
Houma Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds
26.2%
POVERTY | FEMALES 18-24
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
332nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Houma Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 36,618,001 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Houma and poverty level among females between the ages 18 and 24 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.113 and weighted average of 26.2%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Houma within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.51% in poverty level among females between the ages 18 and 24.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Houma and poverty level among females between the ages 18 and 24 does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Houma influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among females between the ages 18 and 24 within an area, or if Houma simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among females between the ages 18 and 24 due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Houma by Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds
In terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds, the demographic groups most similar to Houma are Apache (26.3%, a difference of 0.53%), Chippewa (25.9%, a difference of 1.0%), Immigrants from Somalia (25.7%, a difference of 1.7%), Cajun (25.7%, a difference of 1.9%), and Pueblo (26.9%, a difference of 2.8%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds |
| Immigrants from Saudi Arabia | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 25.3% |
| Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 25.3% |
| Ute | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 25.4% |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 25.4% |
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 25.7% |
| Immigrants from Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 25.7% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 25.9% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 26.2% |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 26.3% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 26.9% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 27.0% |
| Immigrants from Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 27.5% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 28.1% |
| Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 28.2% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 28.4% |
Houma Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Houma Data | Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds Data |
| Minimum | 0.012% | 5.7% |
| Maximum | 9.8% | 56.0% |
| Range | 9.8% | 50.3% |
| Mean | 3.1% | 29.2% |
| Median | 2.7% | 29.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.2% | 22.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 4.4% | 35.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.2% | 13.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.5% | 11.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.4% | 11.1% |
Correlation Details
| Houma Percentile | Sample Size | Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.012% | 35,192,679 | 24.4% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.27% | 556,952 | 29.6% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.53% | 267,680 | 23.6% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.71% | 245,207 | 28.3% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.92% | 72,999 | 31.5% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.09% | 37,268 | 40.4% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.36% | 1,252 | 20.8% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.48% | 23,284 | 34.7% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.77% | 15,031 | 47.3% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.89% | 10,157 | 36.3% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.10% | 6,464 | 30.8% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.56% | 5,499 | 42.9% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.71% | 5,951 | 27.0% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.00% | 25,742 | 32.4% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.09% | 5,118 | 5.7% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.31% | 5,677 | 56.0% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.56% | 33,094 | 22.1% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.79% | 15,373 | 26.7% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.21% | 11,624 | 31.4% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.63% | 30,192 | 22.0% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.16% | 35,760 | 17.1% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.46% | 5,845 | 9.9% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.04% | 3,762 | 16.4% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.99% | 2,880 | 31.4% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.84% | 2,511 | 40.2% |