Houma vs Lithuanian Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Houma
Lithuanian
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Houma
Lithuanians
6.4%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
279th/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.0%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
11th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Houma vs Lithuanian Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 36,736,486 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Houma and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.636 and weighted average of 6.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 416,141,863 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Lithuanians and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.067 and weighted average of 4.0%, a difference of 61.1%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Houma | Lithuanian |
| Minimum | 2.3% | 1.6% |
| Maximum | 34.9% | 14.7% |
| Range | 32.6% | 13.1% |
| Mean | 8.0% | 4.6% |
| Median | 6.5% | 3.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.8% | 3.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.4% | 5.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.5% | 2.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.7% | 2.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.5% | 2.7% |
Similar Demographics by Married-Couple Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Houma by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Houma are West Indian (6.4%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago (6.4%, a difference of 0.25%), Mexican American Indian (6.4%, a difference of 0.56%), Seminole (6.4%, a difference of 0.56%), and Indonesian (6.3%, a difference of 0.73%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
| Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.1 /100 | #272 | Tragic 6.2% |
| Colville | 0.1 /100 | #273 | Tragic 6.3% |
| Barbadians | 0.1 /100 | #274 | Tragic 6.3% |
| Choctaw | 0.1 /100 | #275 | Tragic 6.3% |
| Yaqui | 0.1 /100 | #276 | Tragic 6.3% |
| Indonesians | 0.1 /100 | #277 | Tragic 6.3% |
| Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.1 /100 | #278 | Tragic 6.4% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 6.4% |
| West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 6.4% |
| Mexican American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 6.4% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 6.4% |
| Ute | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 6.4% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 6.4% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Guyanese | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 6.5% |
Demographics Similar to Lithuanians by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Lithuanians are Carpatho Rusyn (3.9%, a difference of 0.51%), Croatian (3.9%, a difference of 0.56%), Bulgarian (4.0%, a difference of 0.70%), Thai (3.9%, a difference of 1.0%), and Latvian (3.9%, a difference of 1.5%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
| Slovenes | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 3.8% |
| Swedes | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 3.9% |
| Luxembourgers | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 3.9% |
| Latvians | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 3.9% |
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 3.9% |
| Croatians | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 3.9% |
| Carpatho Rusyns | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 3.9% |
| Lithuanians | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 4.0% |
| Bulgarians | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 4.0% |
| Czechs | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 4.0% |
| Slovaks | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 4.0% |
| Poles | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 4.0% |
| Germans | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 4.0% |
| Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 4.0% |
| Italians | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 4.0% |