Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Utilities in South Carolina

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Utilities
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
South Carolina
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Utilities in South Carolina

0.0%
25.0%
Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Utilities in South Carolina Map

Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Utilities in South Carolina

City % Employed vs State vs National
1. South Union 24.1% 1.2% (+22.8)#1 0.84% (+23.2)#123
2. Abney Crossroads 23.8% 1.2% (+22.6)#2 0.84% (+23.0)#125
3. Windsor 14.9% 1.2% (+13.7)#3 0.84% (+14.1)#289
4. Conestee 13.3% 1.2% (+12.1)#4 0.84% (+12.5)#342
5. Mountville 12.4% 1.2% (+11.1)#5 0.84% (+11.5)#388
6. North Hartsville 12.1% 1.2% (+10.9)#6 0.84% (+11.2)#400
7. Floydale 11.4% 1.2% (+10.1)#7 0.84% (+10.5)#448
8. Slater Marietta 11.2% 1.2% (+10.00)#8 0.84% (+10.4)#452
9. Lynchburg 10.5% 1.2% (+9.30)#9 0.84% (+9.69)#486
10. Dovesville 10.2% 1.2% (+9.02)#10 0.84% (+9.41)#509
11. Chickasaw Point 9.7% 1.2% (+8.51)#11 0.84% (+8.89)#549
12. Mcbee 8.7% 1.2% (+7.52)#12 0.84% (+7.90)#636
13. Six Mile 7.1% 1.2% (+5.89)#13 0.84% (+6.28)#842
14. Lesslie 7.0% 1.2% (+5.77)#14 0.84% (+6.15)#863
15. Graniteville 6.8% 1.2% (+5.55)#15 0.84% (+5.93)#906
16. Edmund 6.6% 1.2% (+5.39)#16 0.84% (+5.78)#953
17. Pinopolis 6.4% 1.2% (+5.18)#17 0.84% (+5.56)#1,003
18. Elko 6.2% 1.2% (+5.03)#18 0.84% (+5.41)#1,034
19. Joanna 6.2% 1.2% (+5.00)#19 0.84% (+5.38)#1,046
20. Cordova 6.0% 1.2% (+4.73)#20 0.84% (+5.12)#1,123
21. Mcconnells 5.7% 1.2% (+4.44)#21 0.84% (+4.82)#1,211
22. Buffalo 5.6% 1.2% (+4.40)#22 0.84% (+4.79)#1,223
23. Buford 5.4% 1.2% (+4.20)#23 0.84% (+4.59)#1,281
24. Snelling 5.3% 1.2% (+4.04)#24 0.84% (+4.43)#1,345
25. Iva 5.0% 1.2% (+3.81)#25 0.84% (+4.19)#1,454
26. Little River 4.8% 1.2% (+3.63)#26 0.84% (+4.01)#1,533
27. Elgin 4.8% 1.2% (+3.57)#27 0.84% (+3.95)#1,555
28. Jenkinsville 4.8% 1.2% (+3.54)#28 0.84% (+3.92)#1,581
29. Cameron 4.7% 1.2% (+3.52)#29 0.84% (+3.90)#1,589
30. Newport 4.7% 1.2% (+3.47)#30 0.84% (+3.85)#1,610
31. Blackville 4.6% 1.2% (+3.38)#31 0.84% (+3.77)#1,661
32. Coward 4.6% 1.2% (+3.38)#32 0.84% (+3.77)#1,662
33. Laurel Bay 4.6% 1.2% (+3.36)#33 0.84% (+3.75)#1,672
34. Westminster 4.5% 1.2% (+3.32)#34 0.84% (+3.71)#1,690
35. Baxter 4.3% 1.2% (+3.12)#35 0.84% (+3.50)#1,833
36. Seneca 4.3% 1.2% (+3.08)#36 0.84% (+3.46)#1,847
37. Lake Secession 4.3% 1.2% (+3.04)#37 0.84% (+3.42)#1,870
38. Kingstree 4.2% 1.2% (+2.95)#38 0.84% (+3.33)#1,921
39. Summerton 3.9% 1.2% (+2.71)#39 0.84% (+3.09)#2,092
40. Salem 3.9% 1.2% (+2.70)#40 0.84% (+3.08)#2,100
41. Lake Murray Of Richland 3.7% 1.2% (+2.51)#41 0.84% (+2.90)#2,252
42. Bonneau 3.7% 1.2% (+2.50)#42 0.84% (+2.89)#2,264
43. Jackson 3.7% 1.2% (+2.49)#43 0.84% (+2.88)#2,271
44. Williams 3.7% 1.2% (+2.48)#44 0.84% (+2.87)#2,286
45. Bonneau Beach 3.7% 1.2% (+2.47)#45 0.84% (+2.85)#2,298
46. Cross Hill 3.7% 1.2% (+2.46)#46 0.84% (+2.85)#2,300
47. Inman Mills 3.7% 1.2% (+2.44)#47 0.84% (+2.82)#2,318
48. Sharon 3.6% 1.2% (+2.42)#48 0.84% (+2.81)#2,335
49. Hickory Grove 3.4% 1.2% (+2.17)#49 0.84% (+2.55)#2,550
50. North Augusta 3.3% 1.2% (+2.08)#50 0.84% (+2.47)#2,639
51. Timmonsville 3.3% 1.2% (+2.03)#51 0.84% (+2.42)#2,692
52. Clearwater 3.2% 1.2% (+2.02)#52 0.84% (+2.41)#2,704
53. Little Mountain 3.2% 1.2% (+2.02)#53 0.84% (+2.40)#2,710
54. Gilbert 3.2% 1.2% (+2.00)#54 0.84% (+2.39)#2,719
55. Forestbrook 3.2% 1.2% (+1.97)#55 0.84% (+2.36)#2,747
56. Troy 3.2% 1.2% (+1.95)#56 0.84% (+2.34)#2,768
57. Pickens 3.1% 1.2% (+1.90)#57 0.84% (+2.29)#2,806
58. New Ellenton 3.1% 1.2% (+1.86)#58 0.84% (+2.25)#2,855
59. Varnville 3.0% 1.2% (+1.80)#59 0.84% (+2.19)#2,923
60. Woodford 3.0% 1.2% (+1.76)#60 0.84% (+2.15)#2,971
61. Donalds 2.9% 1.2% (+1.70)#61 0.84% (+2.08)#3,042
62. Chapin 2.9% 1.2% (+1.69)#62 0.84% (+2.08)#3,051
63. Irwin 2.8% 1.2% (+1.56)#63 0.84% (+1.94)#3,221
64. Furman 2.8% 1.2% (+1.54)#64 0.84% (+1.93)#3,253
65. Jefferson 2.8% 1.2% (+1.54)#65 0.84% (+1.93)#3,258
66. Prosperity 2.7% 1.2% (+1.52)#66 0.84% (+1.91)#3,285
67. Olympia 2.6% 1.2% (+1.42)#67 0.84% (+1.80)#3,442
68. Red Bank 2.6% 1.2% (+1.41)#68 0.84% (+1.80)#3,453
69. Gaston 2.6% 1.2% (+1.40)#69 0.84% (+1.79)#3,472
70. Murphys Estates 2.6% 1.2% (+1.37)#70 0.84% (+1.75)#3,513
71. Kershaw 2.6% 1.2% (+1.36)#71 0.84% (+1.74)#3,536
72. Pelion 2.5% 1.2% (+1.29)#72 0.84% (+1.67)#3,636
73. East Gaffney 2.5% 1.2% (+1.27)#73 0.84% (+1.65)#3,675
74. Pimlico 2.5% 1.2% (+1.24)#74 0.84% (+1.62)#3,725
75. Heath Springs 2.5% 1.2% (+1.23)#75 0.84% (+1.62)#3,734
76. West Union 2.5% 1.2% (+1.23)#76 0.84% (+1.62)#3,735
77. Hopkins 2.4% 1.2% (+1.20)#77 0.84% (+1.58)#3,785
78. Bamberg 2.4% 1.2% (+1.20)#78 0.84% (+1.58)#3,794
79. Cowpens 2.4% 1.2% (+1.19)#79 0.84% (+1.57)#3,806
80. Duncan 2.3% 1.2% (+1.12)#80 0.84% (+1.51)#3,924
81. Cateechee 2.3% 1.2% (+1.12)#81 0.84% (+1.50)#3,926
82. Burton 2.3% 1.2% (+1.10)#82 0.84% (+1.49)#3,967
83. Norway 2.3% 1.2% (+1.07)#83 0.84% (+1.45)#4,024
84. Cayce 2.3% 1.2% (+1.05)#84 0.84% (+1.44)#4,059
85. India Hook 2.3% 1.2% (+1.03)#85 0.84% (+1.42)#4,087
86. Ruby 2.2% 1.2% (+1.02)#86 0.84% (+1.40)#4,126
87. Winnsboro 2.2% 1.2% (+1.01)#87 0.84% (+1.40)#4,130
88. Sangaree 2.2% 1.2% (+0.931)#88 0.84% (+1.32)#4,301
89. Moncks Corner 2.2% 1.2% (+0.931)#89 0.84% (+1.32)#4,302
90. Gaffney 2.1% 1.2% (+0.877)#90 0.84% (+1.26)#4,423
91. Greeleyville 2.1% 1.2% (+0.847)#91 0.84% (+1.23)#4,491
92. Brookdale 2.1% 1.2% (+0.846)#92 0.84% (+1.23)#4,493
93. Lake Wylie 2.1% 1.2% (+0.845)#93 0.84% (+1.23)#4,494
94. Scranton 2.1% 1.2% (+0.830)#94 0.84% (+1.22)#4,531
95. Bethune 2.0% 1.2% (+0.805)#95 0.84% (+1.19)#4,595
96. Modoc 2.0% 1.2% (+0.794)#96 0.84% (+1.18)#4,622
97. Hilda 2.0% 1.2% (+0.791)#97 0.84% (+1.18)#4,627
98. Keowee Key 2.0% 1.2% (+0.731)#98 0.84% (+1.12)#4,763
99. Mayo 1.9% 1.2% (+0.724)#99 0.84% (+1.11)#4,778
100. Boiling Springs 1.9% 1.2% (+0.697)#100 0.84% (+1.08)#4,845

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Utilities in South Carolina?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Utilities in South Carolina are:
#1
14.9%
#2
12.4%
#3
12.1%
#4
11.2%
#5
10.5%
#6
8.7%
#7
7.1%
#8
7.0%
#9
6.8%
#10
6.4%
What city has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Utilities in South Carolina?
Windsor has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Utilities in South Carolina with 14.9%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Utilities in the State of South Carolina?
Percentage of Population Employed in Utilities in South Carolina is 1.2%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Utilities in the United States?
Percentage of Population Employed in Utilities in the United States is 0.84%.