Cities with the Highest Male Poverty Level in South Carolina

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Highest Poverty | Male
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
South Carolina
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Male Poverty Level in South Carolina

0.0%
100.0%
Cities with the Highest Male Poverty Level in South Carolina Map

Cities with the Highest Male Poverty Level in South Carolina

City Male Poverty vs State vs National
1. Clemson University 100.0% 13.0% (+87.0)#1 11.3% (+88.7)#1
2. Willington 100.0% 13.0% (+87.0)#2 11.3% (+88.7)#43
3. Coronaca 100.0% 13.0% (+87.0)#3 11.3% (+88.7)#79
4. Cross Anchor 100.0% 13.0% (+87.0)#4 11.3% (+88.7)#90
5. Olympia 77.0% 13.0% (+64.0)#5 11.3% (+65.6)#222
6. Bradley 75.2% 13.0% (+62.2)#6 11.3% (+63.9)#240
7. Lynchburg 70.4% 13.0% (+57.4)#7 11.3% (+59.1)#307
8. Arthurtown 65.1% 13.0% (+52.1)#8 11.3% (+53.8)#388
9. Oswego 62.7% 13.0% (+49.6)#9 11.3% (+51.3)#428
10. Clifton 59.5% 13.0% (+46.5)#10 11.3% (+48.2)#519
11. Jenkinsville 58.8% 13.0% (+45.8)#11 11.3% (+47.5)#544
12. Sellers 58.5% 13.0% (+45.5)#12 11.3% (+47.2)#552
13. Daviston 56.0% 13.0% (+43.0)#13 11.3% (+44.7)#625
14. Little Rock 54.8% 13.0% (+41.8)#14 11.3% (+43.5)#673
15. Zion 52.9% 13.0% (+39.9)#15 11.3% (+41.6)#736
16. Alcolu 51.3% 13.0% (+38.3)#16 11.3% (+40.0)#803
17. City View 49.6% 13.0% (+36.6)#17 11.3% (+38.3)#901
18. Southern Shops 49.0% 13.0% (+36.0)#18 11.3% (+37.7)#926
19. Holly Hill 47.7% 13.0% (+34.6)#19 11.3% (+36.3)#999
20. Saluda 46.6% 13.0% (+33.6)#20 11.3% (+35.3)#1,061
21. Cash 46.4% 13.0% (+33.4)#21 11.3% (+35.1)#1,079
22. Dillon 44.7% 13.0% (+31.7)#22 11.3% (+33.4)#1,167
23. Enoree 44.7% 13.0% (+31.6)#23 11.3% (+33.3)#1,177
24. Modoc 44.1% 13.0% (+31.0)#24 11.3% (+32.7)#1,216
25. Ridgeway 43.5% 13.0% (+30.5)#25 11.3% (+32.2)#1,249
26. Waterloo 41.7% 13.0% (+28.6)#26 11.3% (+30.3)#1,403
27. Springfield 41.2% 13.0% (+28.2)#27 11.3% (+29.9)#1,446
28. Iva 41.1% 13.0% (+28.0)#28 11.3% (+29.7)#1,470
29. Centenary 41.0% 13.0% (+28.0)#29 11.3% (+29.7)#1,471
30. Ware Shoals 40.9% 13.0% (+27.9)#30 11.3% (+29.6)#1,484
31. Williams 40.8% 13.0% (+27.7)#31 11.3% (+29.4)#1,503
32. Judson 40.7% 13.0% (+27.7)#32 11.3% (+29.4)#1,511
33. Antreville 40.2% 13.0% (+27.1)#33 11.3% (+28.8)#1,557
34. Irwin 39.8% 13.0% (+26.7)#34 11.3% (+28.4)#1,595
35. Clemson 39.6% 13.0% (+26.6)#35 11.3% (+28.3)#1,608
36. Bonneau 39.2% 13.0% (+26.1)#36 11.3% (+27.8)#1,649
37. East Sumter 39.2% 13.0% (+26.1)#37 11.3% (+27.8)#1,652
38. Lobeco 39.1% 13.0% (+26.0)#38 11.3% (+27.7)#1,664
39. Dovesville 39.0% 13.0% (+25.9)#39 11.3% (+27.6)#1,673
40. Cheraw 38.8% 13.0% (+25.7)#40 11.3% (+27.4)#1,697
41. Central 38.2% 13.0% (+25.1)#41 11.3% (+26.8)#1,765
42. Bamberg 37.8% 13.0% (+24.8)#42 11.3% (+26.5)#1,802
43. Drayton 37.0% 13.0% (+24.0)#43 11.3% (+25.7)#1,903
44. North 37.0% 13.0% (+24.0)#44 11.3% (+25.7)#1,906
45. Cowpens 36.3% 13.0% (+23.3)#45 11.3% (+25.0)#1,986
46. Allendale 36.3% 13.0% (+23.2)#46 11.3% (+24.9)#1,994
47. Johnston 36.1% 13.0% (+23.1)#47 11.3% (+24.8)#2,010
48. Lodge 36.0% 13.0% (+23.0)#48 11.3% (+24.7)#2,025
49. Brookdale 35.9% 13.0% (+22.8)#49 11.3% (+24.5)#2,043
50. Homewood 35.6% 13.0% (+22.5)#50 11.3% (+24.2)#2,075
51. Orangeburg 35.4% 13.0% (+22.3)#51 11.3% (+24.0)#2,100
52. Bowman 35.3% 13.0% (+22.3)#52 11.3% (+24.0)#2,108
53. Atlantic Beach 34.7% 13.0% (+21.7)#53 11.3% (+23.4)#2,192
54. St Matthews 34.6% 13.0% (+21.6)#54 11.3% (+23.3)#2,208
55. Saxon 34.0% 13.0% (+20.9)#55 11.3% (+22.6)#2,293
56. Santee 33.8% 13.0% (+20.7)#56 11.3% (+22.4)#2,313
57. Unity 33.8% 13.0% (+20.7)#57 11.3% (+22.4)#2,319
58. Timmonsville 33.4% 13.0% (+20.4)#58 11.3% (+22.1)#2,361
59. Eutawville 33.2% 13.0% (+20.1)#59 11.3% (+21.8)#2,416
60. Wilkinson Heights 32.1% 13.0% (+19.0)#60 11.3% (+20.7)#2,587
61. Pelzer 31.8% 13.0% (+18.8)#61 11.3% (+20.5)#2,636
62. St Stephen 31.7% 13.0% (+18.7)#62 11.3% (+20.4)#2,661
63. Winnsboro 31.7% 13.0% (+18.7)#63 11.3% (+20.4)#2,665
64. Buffalo 31.4% 13.0% (+18.4)#64 11.3% (+20.1)#2,713
65. Gayle Mill 31.2% 13.0% (+18.2)#65 11.3% (+19.9)#2,745
66. Estill 31.2% 13.0% (+18.2)#66 11.3% (+19.9)#2,750
67. Manville 31.0% 13.0% (+17.9)#67 11.3% (+19.6)#2,793
68. Marion 30.9% 13.0% (+17.9)#68 11.3% (+19.6)#2,801
69. Lake View 30.7% 13.0% (+17.7)#69 11.3% (+19.4)#2,844
70. Fair Play 30.6% 13.0% (+17.5)#70 11.3% (+19.2)#2,862
71. Hamer 30.5% 13.0% (+17.5)#71 11.3% (+19.2)#2,870
72. Salley 30.5% 13.0% (+17.4)#72 11.3% (+19.1)#2,873
73. Walhalla 30.2% 13.0% (+17.2)#73 11.3% (+18.9)#2,937
74. Westminster 30.1% 13.0% (+17.1)#74 11.3% (+18.8)#2,947
75. Langley 30.0% 13.0% (+17.0)#75 11.3% (+18.7)#2,970
76. Homeland Park 30.0% 13.0% (+16.9)#76 11.3% (+18.6)#2,992
77. Great Falls 29.9% 13.0% (+16.8)#77 11.3% (+18.5)#3,008
78. Sharon 29.6% 13.0% (+16.5)#78 11.3% (+18.2)#3,066
79. Andrews 29.5% 13.0% (+16.5)#79 11.3% (+18.2)#3,088
80. Dunbar 29.2% 13.0% (+16.2)#80 11.3% (+17.9)#3,153
81. Denmark 29.0% 13.0% (+16.0)#81 11.3% (+17.7)#3,197
82. Floydale 28.9% 13.0% (+15.9)#82 11.3% (+17.6)#3,228
83. Lake City 28.9% 13.0% (+15.9)#83 11.3% (+17.6)#3,229
84. Bethune 28.9% 13.0% (+15.8)#84 11.3% (+17.5)#3,235
85. St George 28.6% 13.0% (+15.6)#85 11.3% (+17.2)#3,295
86. Hartsville 28.6% 13.0% (+15.5)#86 11.3% (+17.2)#3,297
87. Coward 28.6% 13.0% (+15.5)#87 11.3% (+17.2)#3,302
88. Chesterfield 28.5% 13.0% (+15.4)#88 11.3% (+17.1)#3,334
89. Lamar 28.4% 13.0% (+15.3)#89 11.3% (+17.0)#3,360
90. Whitmire 28.3% 13.0% (+15.3)#90 11.3% (+17.0)#3,367
91. Starr 28.1% 13.0% (+15.0)#91 11.3% (+16.7)#3,422
92. Utica 27.9% 13.0% (+14.9)#92 11.3% (+16.6)#3,459
93. Union 27.9% 13.0% (+14.9)#93 11.3% (+16.6)#3,467
94. Belvedere 27.9% 13.0% (+14.8)#94 11.3% (+16.5)#3,473
95. Barnwell 27.8% 13.0% (+14.8)#95 11.3% (+16.5)#3,483
96. Parker 27.8% 13.0% (+14.7)#96 11.3% (+16.4)#3,502
97. Watts Mills 27.7% 13.0% (+14.7)#97 11.3% (+16.4)#3,523
98. Bishopville 27.6% 13.0% (+14.5)#98 11.3% (+16.2)#3,555
99. Gray Court 27.4% 13.0% (+14.3)#99 11.3% (+16.0)#3,595
100. Arcadia 27.3% 13.0% (+14.2)#100 11.3% (+15.9)#3,639

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Male Poverty Level in South Carolina?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Male Poverty Level in South Carolina are:
#1
100.0%
#2
100.0%
#3
100.0%
#4
75.2%
#5
70.4%
#6
62.7%
#7
59.5%
#8
58.8%
#9
58.5%
#10
51.3%
What city has the Highest Male Poverty Level in South Carolina?
Willington has the Highest Male Poverty Level in South Carolina with 100.0%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Males in the State of South Carolina?
Poverty Level Among Males in South Carolina is 13.0%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Males in the United States?
Poverty Level Among Males in the United States is 11.3%.